Abstract This paper analyses the community values of residential neighborhoods in the southwestern region of Saudi Arabia as an approach to a new theory in urbanism. The indigenous masterbuilders and tribemen incorporated planning decisions pertinent to climatic, cultural, social, economic and religious factors when designing physical elements in their built environment. This is what makes every traditional settlement in the southwest region of Saudi Arabia unique in terms of urban form and social structure. As a step to examining and evaluating the process of residential neighborhood development, three stages of practiced urbanism are discussed. These stages are labelled “vernacular”, “transitional” and “new vernacularism”. These are planning concepts used worldwide in the development of residential neighborhoods throughout history until the present. “New Vernacularism” is envisioned in this investigation as a design/planning objective implemented in most recently planned neighborhoods in Al-Horaidhah, Southwest Saudi Arabia. The achievement of successful urbanism underlies the political goals of urban planning practice. The Al-Horaidhah planning concept is conceived in the light of preservation of community values in neighborhood design/planning as a critical issue. The paper aims to investigate and reconcile the conflicts in the planning of residential neighborhoods in a changing world. The conflicts are restricted between retaining traditions of architecture, urban design and planning with the necessary social, economic, and technological changes in urban formation, mainly, the vernacular and modern. The paper illustrates the concept “New Vernacularism” by presenting Al-Horaidhah scheme as a model for community development in three administrative regions along the Red Sea coastline. “New Vernacularism” as a planning concept looks at the community development in Al-Horaidhah in the light of Sharicah, the Islamic Law and Customary norms by emphasizing the importance of the involvement of local residents in the planning process and gives suggestions of how this might best be achieved and later implemented into new communities.
[1]
Z. Çelik,et al.
Cities and Caliphs: On the Genesis of Arab Muslim Urbanism
,
1992
.
[2]
S. Al-Hathloul.
Tradition, continuity and change in the physical environment : the Arab-Muslim city
,
1981
.
[3]
P. Calthorpe.
The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream
,
1993
.
[4]
B. Al-Abed.
Aspects of Arabic Islamic architectural discourse
,
1992
.
[5]
Abdulaziz Y. Saqqaf.
The Middle East City: Ancient Traditions Confront a Modern World
,
1986
.
[6]
N. Coulson.
A History of Islamic Law
,
2019
.
[7]
Jeffrey Kenworthy,et al.
Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence
,
1999
.
[8]
D. Schuyler.
The new urbanism and the modern metropolis
,
1997,
Urban History.
[9]
Cath Oberholtzer.
The Re-Invention of Tradition and the Marketing of Cultural Values
,
1995
.
[10]
David Allan Hamer,et al.
Learning from the past: Historic Districts and the New Urbanism in the United States
,
2000
.
[11]
D. Appleyard.
Planning a Pluralist City: Conflicting Realities in Ciudad Guayana
,
1976
.
[12]
Deborah Howard.
Venice and Islam in the Middle Ages: Some observations on the question of architectural influence
,
1991,
Architectural History.
[13]
Besim Selim Hakim,et al.
Arabic-Islamic Cities: Building and Planning Principles
,
1986
.
[14]
Douglas Kelbaugh,et al.
Common place : toward neighborhood and regional design
,
1997
.
[15]
Hamid Shirvani,et al.
The Urban Design Process
,
1985
.
[16]
J. Eighmy,et al.
Hema and traditional land use management among arid zone villagers of Saudi Arabia
,
1984,
Journal of Arid Environments.