Ex vivo ultrasound control of resection margins during partial nephrectomy.

PURPOSE Surgery remains the treatment of choice for localized renal neoplasms. While radical nephrectomy was long considered the gold standard, partial nephrectomy has equivalent oncological results for small tumors. The role of negative surgical margins continues to be debated. Intraoperative frozen section analysis is expensive and time-consuming. We assessed the feasibility of intraoperative ex vivo ultrasound of resection margins in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy and its correlation with margin status on definitive pathological evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHODS A study was done at 2 institutions from February 2008 to March 2011. Patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for T1-T2 renal tumors were included in analysis. Partial nephrectomy was done by a standardized minimal healthy tissue margin technique. After resection the specimen was kept in saline and tumor margin status was immediately determined by ex vivo ultrasound. Sequential images were obtained to evaluate the whole tumor pseudocapsule. Results were compared with margin status on definitive pathological evaluation. RESULTS A total of 19 men and 14 women with a mean ± SD age of 62 ± 11 years were included in analysis. Intraoperative ex vivo ultrasound revealed negative surgical margins in 30 cases and positive margins in 2 while it could not be done in 1. Final pathological results revealed negative margins in all except 1 case. Ultrasound sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 97%, respectively. Median ultrasound duration was 1 minute. Mean tumor and margin size was 3.6 ± 2.2 cm and 1.5 ± 0.7 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative ex vivo ultrasound of resection margins in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy is feasible and efficient. Large sample studies are needed to confirm its promising accuracy to determine margin status.

[1]  O. Nativ,et al.  Is frozen section analysis in nephron sparing surgery necessary? A clinicopathological study of 301 cases. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[2]  Y. Chrétien,et al.  Prospective study of safety margins in partial nephrectomy: intraoperative assessment and contribution of frozen section analysis. , 2006, Urology.

[3]  Paul Russo,et al.  Tumor size is associated with malignant potential in renal cell carcinoma cases. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[4]  Ian S Hagemann,et al.  Letters to the Editor/Errata Re: A Retrospective Comparison of 2 Methods of Intraoperative Margin Evaluation During Partial Nephrectomy , 2009 .

[5]  M. Meng,et al.  Intraoperative sonography for the evaluation and management of renal tumors: experience with 100 patients. , 1995, The Journal of urology.

[6]  M. Schonlau,et al.  Renal and cardiovascular morbidity after partial or radical nephrectomy , 2008, Cancer.

[7]  H. Winfield,et al.  Technique for ensuring negative surgical margins during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. , 2005, Journal of endourology.

[8]  J. Kaouk,et al.  Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[9]  A. Novick,et al.  Nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: impact of tumor size on patient survival, tumor recurrence and TNM staging. , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[10]  A. Antonelli,et al.  Nephron-Sparing Surgery versus Radical Nephrectomy in the Treatment of Intracapsular Renal Cell Carcinoma up to 7 cm , 2008 .

[11]  Paul Russo,et al.  Positive surgical margins at partial nephrectomy: predictors and oncological outcomes. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[12]  Stephen A Boorjian,et al.  Radical nephrectomy for pT1a renal masses may be associated with decreased overall survival compared with partial nephrectomy. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[13]  Jun-Tao Jiang,et al.  Clear cell renal cell carcinoma: contrast-enhanced ultrasound features relation to tumor size. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[14]  Andrew J Vickers,et al.  Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: a retrospective cohort study. , 2006, The Lancet. Oncology.

[15]  Mihir M Desai,et al.  Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor: duplicating open surgical techniques. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[16]  K. Bensalah,et al.  Positive surgical margin appears to have negligible impact on survival of renal cell carcinomas treated by nephron-sparing surgery. , 2010, European urology.

[17]  J. Lam,et al.  Importance of surgical margins in the management of renal cell carcinoma , 2008, Nature Clinical Practice Urology.

[18]  H. Poppel.  Efficacy and safety of nephron-sparing surgery. , 2010 .

[19]  D. J. Kubinski,et al.  Utility of frozen section analysis of resection margins during partial nephrectomy. , 2004, Urology.

[20]  L. Kavoussi,et al.  Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: evaluation of long-term oncological outcome. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[21]  R. Venkatesh,et al.  Evolution of surgical technique and patient outcomes for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. , 2006, Urology.

[22]  S. Meijer,et al.  A comparison of three methods for nonpalpable breast cancer excision. , 2011, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[23]  Paul Russo,et al.  Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy in patients with small renal tumors--is there a difference in mortality and cardiovascular outcomes? , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[24]  B. Fornage,et al.  Interventional breast sonography. , 2002, European journal of radiology.

[25]  C. Zuiani,et al.  Surgical specimen ultrasound: is it able to predict the status of resection margins after breast-conserving surgery? , 2010, Breast.

[26]  F. Algaba,et al.  Handling and pathology reporting of renal tumor specimens. , 2004, European urology.

[27]  M. Cooperberg,et al.  Renal cell cancer stage migration , 2008, Cancer.

[28]  P Fornara,et al.  Positive margins in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in 855 cases: a multi-institutional survey from the United States and Europe. , 2007, The Journal of urology.