Visible binocular beats from invisible monocular stimuli during binocular rivalry

When two qualitatively different stimuli are presented at the same time, one to each eye, the stimuli can either integrate or compete with each other. When they compete, one of the two stimuli is alternately suppressed, a phenomenon called binocular rivalry [1,2]. When they integrate, observers see some form of the combined stimuli. Many different properties (for example, shape or color) of the two stimuli can induce binocular rivalry. Not all differences result in rivalry, however. Visual 'beats', for example, are the result of integration of high-frequency flicker between the two eyes [3,4], and are thus a binocular fusion phenomenon. It remains in dispute whether binocular fusion and rivalry can co-exist with one another [5-7]. Here, we report that rivalry and beats, two apparently opposing phenomena, can be perceived at the same time within the same spatial location. We hypothesized that the interocular difference in visual attributes that are predominantly processed in the Parvocellular pathway will lead to rivalry, and differences in visual attributes that are predominantly processed in the Magnocellular pathway tend to integrate. Further predictions based on this hypothesis were tested and confirmed.

[1]  Eugene Switkes,et al.  Parallel processing of motion and colour information , 1987, Nature.

[2]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Binocular Rivalry and Visual Awareness in Human Extrastriate Cortex , 1998, Neuron.

[3]  V. Ramachandran Form, motion, and binocular rivalry , 1991, Science.

[4]  R. Karrer Visual beat phenomena as an index to the temporal characteristics of perception. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Functions of the colour-opponent and broad-band channels of the visual system , 1990, Nature.

[6]  J M Wolfe,et al.  Influence of Spatial Frequency, Luminance, and Duration on Binocular Rivalry and Abnormal Fusion of Briefly Presented Dichoptic Stimuli , 1983, Perception.

[7]  W. Levelt On binocular rivalry , 1965 .

[8]  R. Blake What Can Be “Perceived” in the Absence of Visual Awareness? , 1997 .

[9]  D. Levi,et al.  Binocular beats: Psychophysical studies of binocular interaction in normal and stereoblind humans , 1989, Vision Research.

[10]  Ian P. Howard,et al.  Binocular Vision and Stereopsis , 1996 .

[11]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry , 1996, Nature.

[12]  Robert P. O'Shea,et al.  The effect of spatial frequency and field size on the spread of exclusive visibility in binocular rivalry , 1997, Vision Research.

[13]  A. H. Hastorf,et al.  The Effect of Meaning on Binocular Rivalry , 1959 .

[14]  N. Logothetis,et al.  What is rivalling during binocular rivalry , 1996 .

[15]  Jochen Braun,et al.  Blindsight in normal observers , 1995, Nature.

[16]  C. Tyler,et al.  Failure of rivalry at low contrast: Evidence of a suprathreshold binocular summation process , 1992, Vision Research.

[17]  Randolph Blake,et al.  On the coexistence of stereopsis and binocular rivalry , 1991, Vision Research.

[18]  S P McKee,et al.  Binocular Rivalry Disrupts Stereopsis , 1994, Perception.

[19]  R. Creed,et al.  Observations on binocular fusion and rivalry , 1935, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  J. Cronly-Dillon,et al.  Vision and visual dysfunction. , 1994, Journal of cognitive neuroscience.

[21]  DH Hubel,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[22]  B. B. Breese Can Binocular Rivalry be Suppressed by Practise , 1909 .

[23]  J J Kulikowski Binocular chromatic rivalry and single vision , 1992, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[24]  G. Rees,et al.  Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. , 1998, Science.

[25]  V. S. RAMACHANDRAN,et al.  Stereopsis generated with Julesz Patterns in Spite of Rivalry imposed by Colour Filters , 1972, Nature.

[26]  M. Morgan,et al.  Blindsight in normal subjects? , 1997, Nature.

[27]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  Form and motion have independent access to consciousness , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  H. Asher Suppression Theory of Binocular Vision * , 1953, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[29]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Dichoptic temporal frequency differences do not lead to binocular rivalry , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  Ian P. Howard,et al.  Binocular fusion and rivalry , 1996 .

[31]  David Williams,et al.  Binocular rivalry with isoluminant stimuli visible only via short-wavelength-sensitive cones , 1996, Vision Research.

[32]  J. Wolfe Stereopsis and binocular rivalry. , 1986, Psychological review.

[33]  Anne Treisman,et al.  Binocular Rivalry and Stereoscopic Depth Perception , 1962 .