Abstract This paper focuses on sensitivity analysis of results from computer models in which both epistemic and aleatory uncertainties are present. Sensitivity is defined in the sense of “uncertainty importance” in order to identify and to rank the principal sources of epistemic uncertainty. A natural and consistent way to arrive at sensitivity results in such cases would be a two-dimensional or double-loop nested Monte Carlo sampling strategy in which the epistemic parameters are sampled in the outer loop and the aleatory variables are sampled in the nested inner loop. However, the computational effort of this procedure may be prohibitive for complex and time-demanding codes. This paper therefore suggests an approximate method for sensitivity analysis based on particular one-dimensional or single-loop sampling procedures, which require substantially less computational effort. From the results of such sampling one can obtain approximate estimates of several standard uncertainty importance measures for the aleatory probability distributions and related probabilistic quantities of the model outcomes of interest. The reliability of the approximate sensitivity results depends on the effect of all epistemic uncertainties on the total joint epistemic and aleatory uncertainty of the outcome. The magnitude of this effect can be expressed quantitatively and estimated from the same single-loop samples. The higher it is the more accurate the approximate sensitivity results will be. A case study, which shows that the results from the proposed approximate method are comparable to those obtained with the full two-dimensional approach, is provided.
[1]
Michael D. McKay,et al.
Evaluating Prediction Uncertainty
,
1995
.
[2]
Jon C. Helton,et al.
Conceptual structure of the 1996 performance assessment for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant
,
2000,
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..
[3]
Enrico Zio,et al.
Monte Carlo approach to PSA for dynamic process systems
,
1996
.
[4]
Pierre-Etienne Labeau.
Improved Monte Carlo simulation of generalized unreliability in probabilistic dynamics
,
1996
.
[5]
Eduard Hofer,et al.
An approximate epistemic uncertainty analysis approach in the presence of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties
,
2002,
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..
[6]
Brian D. Ripley,et al.
Stochastic Simulation
,
2005
.
[7]
M.J.W. Jansen,et al.
Review of Saltelli, A. & Chan, K. & E.M.Scott (Eds) (2000), Sensitivity analysis. Wiley (2000)
,
2001
.
[8]
Samuel Karlin,et al.
A First Course on Stochastic Processes
,
1968
.
[9]
Niels C. Lind,et al.
Methods of structural safety
,
2006
.
[10]
Vinh N. Dang,et al.
Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management
,
2004
.
[11]
N. Siu,et al.
Risk assessment for dynamic systems: An overview
,
1994
.
[12]
A. Saltelli,et al.
Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models
,
1996
.