The coevolution of two phytoplankton species on a single resource: allelopathy as a pseudo-mixotrophy.

Without the top-down effects and the external/physical forcing, a stable coexistence of two phytoplankton species under a single resource is impossible - a result well known from the principle of competitive exclusion. Here I demonstrate by analysis of a mathematical model that such a stable coexistence in a homogeneous media without any external factor would be possible, at least theoretically, provided (i) one of the two species is toxin producing thereby has an allelopathic effect on the other, and (ii) the allelopathic effect exceeds a critical level. The threshold level of allelopathy required for the coexistence has been derived analytically in terms of the parameters associated with the resource competition and the nutrient recycling. That the extra mortality of a competitor driven by allelopathy of a toxic species gives a positive feed back to the algal growth process through the recycling is explained. And that this positive feed back plays a pivotal role in reducing competition pressures and helping species succession in the two-species model is demonstrated. Based on these specific coexistence results, I introduce and explain theoretically the allelopathic effect of a toxic species as a 'pseudo-mixotrophy'-a mechanism of 'if you cannot beat them or eat them, just kill them by chemical weapons'. The impact of this mechanism of species succession by pseudo-mixotrophy in the form of alleopathy is discussed in the context of current understanding on straight mixotrophy and resource-species relationship among phytoplankton species.

[1]  A. G. Fredrickson,et al.  Inhibition as a Factor in the Maintenance of the Diversity of Microbial Ecosystems , 1978 .

[2]  M. Schagerl,et al.  Allelopathy among Cyanoprokaryota and Other Algae Originating from Lake Neusiedlersee (Austria) , 2002 .

[3]  Leonardo Guzman,et al.  Comparison of allelopathic properties in three toxic Alexandrium species , 1999 .

[4]  A. Cembella.  Chemical ecology of eukaryotic microalgae in marine ecosystems , 2003 .

[5]  J. Pignatello,et al.  Isolation of chlorine-containing antibiotic from the freshwater cyanobacterium Scytonema hofmanni. , 1982, Science.

[6]  Shovonlal Roy,et al.  Competing Effects of Toxin-Producing Phytoplankton on Overall Plankton Populations in the Bay of Bengal , 2006, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[7]  Marten Scheffer,et al.  On the Dominance of filamentous cyanobacteria in shallow, turbid lakes , 1997 .

[8]  G. Hardin.  The competitive exclusion principle. , 1960, Science.

[9]  Erik Selander,et al.  Allelopathy in Alexandrium spp.: effect on a natural plankton community and on algal monocultures , 2004 .

[10]  C. Wiedner,et al.  Success of chrysophytes, cryptophytes and dinoflagellates over blue-greens (cyanobacteria) during an extreme winter (1995/96) in eutrophic shallow lakes , 1998, Hydrobiologia.

[11]  David M. Karl,et al.  Reduced mixing generates oscillations and chaos in the oceanic deep chlorophyll maximum , 2006, Nature.

[12]  R. Lenski,et al.  Chemical warfare from an ecological perspective , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  R. May.  Thresholds and breakpoints in ecosystems with a multiplicity of stable states , 1977, Nature.

[14]  J. Pitchford,et al.  Mixotrophy, allelopathy and the population dynamics of phagotrophic algae (cryptophytes) in the Darss Zingst Bodden estuary, southern Baltic , 2006 .

[15]  K. Davidson.  Modelling microbial food webs , 1996 .

[16]  P. Amarasekare.  Interference competition and species coexistence , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  J. Grover,et al.  Mixotrophy and the persistence of Prymnesium parvum when in competition with bacteria , 2008 .

[18]  J. Huisman,et al.  Allelopathic interactions between phytoplankton species: The roles of heterotrophic bacteria and mixing intensity , 2004 .

[19]  S. Chattopadhyay.  TOXIN-ALLELOPATHY AMONG PHYTOPLANKTON SPECIES PREVENTS COMPETITIVE EXCLUSION , 2006, q-bio/0607016.

[20]  C. Legrand,et al.  Toxicity in Peridinium aciculiferum—an adaptive strategy to outcompete other winter phytoplankton? , 2001 .

[21]  Per Juel Hansen,et al.  Allelopathy in the prymnesiophyte Chrysochromulina polylepis: effect of cell concentration, growth phase and pH , 2001 .

[22]  P. Chesson.  Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[23]  J. Grover.  Resource Competition , 1997, Population and Community Biology Series.

[24]  U. Tillmann.  Kill and eat your predator: a winning strategy of the planktonic flagellate Prymnesium parvum , 2003 .

[25]  J P Braselton,et al.  A competition model with dynamically allocated inhibitor production. , 2001, Mathematical biosciences.

[26]  J. Huisman,et al.  Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations and chaos , 1999, Nature.

[27]  S. Jørgensen.  Models in Ecology , 1975 .

[28]  D. Tilman.  Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[29]  E. Granéli,et al.  Increase in the production of allelopathic substances by Prymnesium parvum cells grown under N- or P-deficient conditions , 2003 .

[30]  Paul Waltman,et al.  A survey of mathematical models of competition with an inhibitor. , 2004, Mathematical biosciences.

[31]  Joydev Chattopadhyay,et al.  Towards a resolution of ‘the paradox of the plankton’: A brief overview of the proposed mechanisms , 2007 .

[32]  Yuichi Kotani,et al.  Interactions between the red tide dinoflagellates Heterocapsa circularisquama and Gymnodinium mikimotoi in laboratory culture , 1999 .

[33]  Emilio García-Ladona,et al.  Modelling allelopathy among marine algae , 2005 .

[34]  G. E. Hutchinson,et al.  The Balance of Nature and Human Impact: The paradox of the plankton , 2013 .

[35]  D. Bird,et al.  Phagotrophic sustenance of a metalimnetic phytoplankton peak , 1989 .

[36]  John Maynard Smith.  Models in ecology , 1974 .

[37]  B. Levin.  Frequency-dependent selection in bacterial populations. , 1988, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[38]  A. M. Edwards.  A rational dynamical-systems approach to plankton population modelling , 1997 .

[39]  Marten Scheffer,et al.  Why plankton communities have no equilibrium: solutions to the paradox , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[40]  C. A. Lawrence,et al.  The effects of mixotrophy on the stability and dynamics of a simple planktonic food web model. , 2004, Theoretical population biology.

[41]  A. Kaplan,et al.  Ecological implications of the emergence of non-toxic subcultures from toxic Microcystis strains. , 2005, Environmental microbiology.

[42]  Shovonlal Roy,et al.  Do phytoplankton communities evolve through a self-regulatory abundance-diversity relationship? , 2009, Biosyst..