Abstract Yoked four-person groups and individuals induced a rule under four conditions of information exchange. The yoked groups and individuals exchanged both hypotheses and evidence on each trial, hypotheses only, evidence only, or neither. Both the exchange of hypotheses and the exchange of evidence improved the aggregate performance of the yoked group and individual. Group performance was superior to individual performance. Significant three-way interactions indicated that this superiority was greatest when evidence, but not hypotheses, was exchanged. Alternatively, the interactions indicated that exchange of evidence had relatively more effect than exchange of hypotheses for groups, whereas exchange of hypotheses and exchange of evidence had comparable effects for individuals. The patterns of same and different individual and group hypotheses on trials t and t + 1 indicated more group influence on the individual than individual influence on the group. Social combination analyses of the group hypotheses for distributions of member hypotheses indicated that the same basic social combination process applied in all four conditions. Sequential transition analyses of the transition probabilities from distributions of member hypotheses on trial t to distributions on trial t + 1 indicated that once the correct hypothesis was proposed by one or more group members it was highly likely to be proposed again by one or more members on the subsequent trial. We propose that the inductive task and yoking methodology will be useful for research on majority and minority influence.
[1]
I. Janis.
Victims Of Groupthink
,
1972
.
[2]
L. R. Hoffman.
Group Problem Solving1
,
1965
.
[3]
J. Hackman,et al.
Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration
,
1975
.
[4]
G. W. Hill.
Group versus individual performance: are n + 1 heads better than one?" psychological bulletin
,
1982
.
[5]
B. Latané,et al.
The Social Impact of Majorities and Minorities.
,
1981
.
[6]
J. McGrath.
Groups: Interaction and Performance
,
1984
.
[7]
Helmut Lamm,et al.
Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency
,
1973
.
[8]
M. Deutsch,et al.
A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement.
,
1955,
Journal of abnormal psychology.
[9]
S. Asch.
Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority.
,
1956
.
[10]
Patrick R. Laughlin,et al.
Collective induction: Social combination and sequential transition.
,
1985
.
[11]
Anne Maass,et al.
Hidden impact of minorities: Fifteen years of minority influence research.
,
1984
.
[12]
Steven D. Penrod,et al.
Social Influence Model: A formal integration of research on majority and minority influence processes.
,
1984
.
[13]
S. Fiske,et al.
The Handbook of Social Psychology
,
1935
.
[14]
I. Steiner.
Group process and productivity
,
1972
.