Burn Disaster Response Planning: An Urban Region’s Approach

The objective of this study was to describe a draft response plan for the tiered triage, treatment, or transportation of 400 adult and pediatric victims (50/million population) of a burn disaster for the first 3 to 5 days after injury using regional resources. Review of meeting minutes and the 11 deliverables of the draft response plan was performed. The draft burn disaster response plan developed for NYC recommended: 1) City hospitals or regional burn centers within a 60-mile distance be designated as tiered Burn Disaster Receiving Hospitals (BDRH); 2) these hospitals be divided into a four-tier system, based on clinical resources; and 3) burn care supplies be provided to Tier 3 nonburn centers. Existing burn center referral guidelines were modified into a hierarchical BDRH matrix, which would vector certain patients to local or regional burn centers for initial care until capacity is reached; the remainder would be cared for in nonburn center facilities for up to 3 to 5 days until a city, regional, or national burn bed becomes available. Interfacility triage would be coordinated by a central team. Although recommendations for patient transportation, educational initiatives for prehospital and hospital providers, city-wide, interfacility or interagency communication strategies and coordination at the State or Federal levels were outlined, future initiatives will expound on these issues. An incident resulting in critically injured burn victims exceeding the capacity of local and regional burn center beds may be a reality within any community and warrants a planned response. To address this possibility within New York City, an initial draft of a burn disaster response has been created. A scaleable plan using local, state, regional, or federal health care and governmental institutions was developed.

[1]  Stephanie Schrag,et al.  Prevention of Perinatal Group B Streptococcal Disease Revised Guidelines from CDC , 2002 .

[2]  R. Yurt,et al.  Burn-Injured Patients in a Disaster: September 11th Revisited , 2006, Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association.

[3]  M. Astiz,et al.  The experience at St. Vincent’s Hospital, Manhattan, on September 11, 2001: Preparedness, response, and lessons learned , 2005, Critical care medicine.

[4]  J. Jeng,et al.  The Pentagon attack of September 11, 2001: a burn center's experience. , 2005, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[5]  Glenn Asaeda The day that the START triage system came to a STOP: observations from the World Trade Center disaster. , 2002, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[6]  H. Pachter,et al.  Two New York City hospitals' surgical response to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attack in New York City. , 2003, The Journal of trauma.

[7]  Walter L Biffl,et al.  The station nightclub fire. , 2005, Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation.

[8]  N. Flomenbaum "All the king's horses and all the king's men. . .". , 2003, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[9]  G. Purdue,et al.  Plenary Session II: American Burn Association Disaster Readiness Plan. , 2005, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[10]  R. Yurt,et al.  A regional burn center's response to a disaster: September 11, 2001, and the days beyond. , 2005, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[11]  D. Barillo Disaster management and the ABA Plan. , 2005, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[12]  Mary M. Wagner Care of the Burn Injured Patient , 1981 .