To give or to receive? Factors influencing members' knowledge sharing and community promotion in professional virtual communities

Professional virtual communities (PVCs) bring together geographically dispersed, like-minded people to form a network for knowledge exchange. To promote knowledge sharing, it is important to know why individuals choose to give or to receive knowledge with other community members. We identified factors that were considered influential in increasing community knowledge transfer and examined their impact in PVCs. Data collected from 323 members of two communities were used in our structural equation modeling (SEM). The results suggested that norm of reciprocity, interpersonal trust, knowledge sharing self-efficacy, and perceived relative advantage were significant in affecting knowledge sharing behaviors in PVCs. The knowledge contributing and collecting behaviors were positively related to knowledge utilization. Furthermore, while the collecting behavior had a significant effect on community promotion, the influence of contributing behavior on community promotion was limited.

[1]  Lois E. Tetrick,et al.  The Norm of Reciprocity: Scale Development and Validation in the Chinese Context , 2006, Management and Organization Review.

[2]  Patricia Gongla,et al.  Evolving communities of practice: IBM Global Services experience , 2001, IBM Syst. J..

[3]  Tsai-Hsin Chu,et al.  Exploring knowledge contribution from an OCB perspective , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[4]  Jatinder N. D. Gupta,et al.  IT takes a village: Virtual communities in support of education , 2000, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[5]  Heeseok Lee,et al.  Knowledge Management Enablers, Processes, and Organizational Performance: An Integrative View and Empirical Examination , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  W. S. Chow,et al.  Social network, social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[8]  M. McLure Wasko,et al.  "It is what one does": why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Through a Glass Darkly: Information Technology Design, Identity Verification, and Knowledge Contribution in Online Communities , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  Internet anxiety: An empirical study of the effects of personality, beliefs, and social support , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[11]  Chun-Ming Chang,et al.  Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[12]  Hazel Hall,et al.  Creation and recreation: motivating collaboration to generate knowledge capital in online communities , 2004, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[13]  David L. Paul,et al.  A Field of Study of the Effect of Interpersonal Trust on Virtual Collaborative Relationship Performance , 2004, MIS Q..

[14]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Research Commentary: Introducing a Third Dimension in Information Systems Design - The Case for Incentive Alignment , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  Bart van den Hooff,et al.  Knowledge sharing in context: the influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing , 2004, J. Knowl. Manag..

[16]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Factors, and Organizational Climate , 2005, MIS Q..

[17]  David Gefen,et al.  Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Membership Size, Communication Activity, and Sustainability: A Resource-Based Model of Online Social Structures , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  S AdlerPaul.  Market, Hierarchy, and Trust , 2001 .

[20]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Customer loyalty in e-commerce: an exploration of its antecedents and consequences , 2002 .

[21]  Chin-Lung Hsu,et al.  Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[22]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation , 2005, MIS Q..

[23]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Understanding and Predicting Electronic Commerce Adoption: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior , 2006, MIS Q..

[24]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  Effects of environmental uncertainty on organizational intention to adopt distributed work arrangements , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[25]  Prashant Palvia,et al.  The role of trust in e-commerce relational exchange: A unified model , 2009, Inf. Manag..

[26]  P. Verhoef,et al.  Possible determinants of consumers’ adoption of electronic grocery shopping in the Netherlands , 2001 .

[27]  Eric L. Lesser,et al.  Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks , 2003 .

[28]  Hsiu-Fen Lin,et al.  Determinants of successful virtual communities: Contributions from system characteristics and social factors , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[29]  P. Adler.  Market, Hierarchy, and Trust: The Knowledge Economy and the Future of Capitalism , 2001 .

[30]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model , 2003, MIS Q..

[31]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Introducing a Third Dimension in Information Systems Design: The Case for Incentive Alignment , 2001 .

[32]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  Breaking the Myths of Rewards: An Exploratory Study of Attitudes about Knowledge Sharing , 2002, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[33]  Joon Koh,et al.  Knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an e-business perspective , 2004, Expert Syst. Appl..

[34]  Gunilla Widén,et al.  Explaining knowledge sharing in organizations through the dimensions of social capital , 2004, J. Inf. Sci..

[35]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[36]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-Based Trust , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[37]  Eric T. G. Wang,et al.  Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[38]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.