Accounting for the indirect area effect in stacked species distribution models to map species richness in a montane biodiversity hotspot

Aim: Understanding how species richness is distributed is a critical prerequisite to implement efficient conservation strategies in biodiversity hotspots. Stacked species distribution models (S-SDMs) provide new opportunities to map species richness, but the accuracy of this method may decline with elevation. Here, we test whether variation in model accuracy arises from increasingly unpredictable environments or the decreasing availability of area with increasing elevation, which might affect the regional pool of species and, as a result, the local species richness (the indirect area effect). Location: The New Caledonian biodiversity hotspot (south-west Pacific Ocean). Methods: An individual MAXENT model was built for 562 tree species by combining eight 100-m resolution environmental variables with c. 10,000 occurrence records. For each species, a map was produced at a one-hectare scale indicating the estimated habitat suitability. All models were then summed, and the resulting estimates were compared with richness measured in 11 independent one-hectare inventories. To account for the indirect area effect, S-SDM estimates were adjusted through the Arrhenius' equation linking the number of species hosted by a habitat with its surface area. Results: The S-SDM predictions ranged from 95 to 251 species (mean = 153) while field inventories were lower, ranging from 39 to 131 species (mean = 90). Overall, the S-SDM increasingly overestimated richness as elevation increased. Taking into account the indirect area effect de-correlated residuals from elevation and induced a significant correlation between modelled and measured species richness. Conclusion: The decreasing accuracy of the S-SDM with elevation was explained by the decreasing availability of habitat influencing regional diversity found in each elevational band. Despite remaining difficulties to predict species richness when addressing the indirect area effect, our findings represent a significant step forward towards improved S-SDM designing.

[1]  P. Rich,et al.  A geometric solar radiation model with applications in agriculture and forestry , 2002 .

[2]  L. López-Mata,et al.  Plant species richness and diversity along an altitudinal gradient in the Sierra Nevada, Mexico , 2005 .

[3]  O. Arrhenius,et al.  Species and Area , 1921 .

[4]  T. Jaffré,et al.  Structural and floristic characteristics of a rain forest on schist in New Caledonia : a comparaison with an ultramafic rain forest , 1995 .

[5]  A. Guisan,et al.  Predicting spatial patterns of plant species richness: a comparison of direct macroecological and species stacking modelling approaches , 2011 .

[6]  P. Birnbaum,et al.  Structural and floristic diversity of mixed tropical rain forest in New Caledonia: new data from the New Caledonian Plant Inventory and Permanent Plot Network (NC-PIPPN) , 2014 .

[7]  Xugao Wang,et al.  Spatial variation of species diversity across scales in an old-growth temperate forest of China , 2008, Ecological Research.

[8]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  A new spin on a compositionalist predictive modelling framework for conservation planning: A tropical case study in Ecuador , 2013 .

[9]  John Bell,et al.  A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models , 1997, Environmental Conservation.

[10]  J. Grytnes,et al.  An indirect area effect on elevational species richness patterns , 2007 .

[11]  C. McCain Area and mammalian elevational diversity. , 2007, Ecology.

[12]  J. Svenning,et al.  Distribution and diversity of palms in a tropical biodiversity hotspot (Thailand) assessed by species distribution modeling , 2015 .

[13]  J. Lorite,et al.  Hotspots within hotspots: Endemic plant richness, environmental drivers, and implications for conservation , 2014 .

[14]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  Predicting species diversity in tropical forests. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Jane Elith,et al.  Maxent is not a presence–absence method: a comment on Thibaud et al. , 2014 .

[16]  J. Calabrese,et al.  Stacking species distribution models and adjusting bias by linking them to macroecological models , 2014 .

[17]  B. Ríos-Uzeda,et al.  Using Potential Distribution Models for Patterns of Species Richness, Endemism, and Phytogeography of Palm Species in Bolivia , 2014 .

[18]  Miguel Nakamura Savoy Predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: a test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar , 2007 .

[19]  K. Gaston,et al.  THE LOCAL–REGIONAL RELATIONSHIP: IMMIGRATION, EXTINCTION, AND SCALE , 2005 .

[20]  R. Mittermeier,et al.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities , 2000, Nature.

[21]  Alberto Jiménez-Valverde,et al.  Limitations of Biodiversity Databases: Case Study on Seed‐Plant Diversity in Tenerife, Canary Islands , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[22]  S. Weiss,et al.  GLM versus CCA spatial modeling of plant species distribution , 1999, Plant Ecology.

[23]  T. Jaffré The Relationship between Ecological Diversity and Floristic Diversity in New Caledonia , 1993 .

[24]  X. Font,et al.  Predicting vascular plant richness patterns in Catalonia (NE Spain) using species distribution models , 2012 .

[25]  J. Franklin Moving beyond static species distribution models in support of conservation biogeography , 2010 .

[26]  O. Vetaas,et al.  Variation in plant species richness of different life forms along a subtropical elevation gradient in the Himalayas, east Nepal , 2003 .

[27]  Martin Zobel,et al.  Dark diversity: shedding light on absent species. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[28]  G. Graves,et al.  Source pool geometry and the assembly of continental avifaunas , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Spatial modelling of biodiversity at the community level , 2006 .

[30]  Tanguy Jaffré Etude floristique et structurale de deux forêts denses humides sur roches ultrabasiques en Nouvelle-Calédonie , 1990 .

[31]  Catherine H. Graham,et al.  A comparison of methods for mapping species ranges and species richness , 2006 .

[32]  T. Jafff Structural and floristic characteristics of a rain forest on schist in New Caledonia : a comparison with an ultramafic rain forest , 1995 .

[33]  F. He,et al.  Scale dependence of tree abundance and richness in a tropical rain forest, Malaysia , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[34]  Steven Bachman,et al.  Plant Diversity Hotspots in the Atlantic Coastal Forests of Brazil , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[35]  N. Raes,et al.  Botanical richness and endemicity patterns of Borneo derived from species distribution models , 2009 .

[36]  J. Chun,et al.  Altitudinal patterns of plant species richness on the Baekdudaegan Mountains, South Korea: mid-domain effect, area, climate, and Rapoport’s rule , 2012, Ecological Research.

[37]  J. Elith,et al.  Species Distribution Models: Ecological Explanation and Prediction Across Space and Time , 2009 .

[38]  Eve McDonald-Madden,et al.  Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions , 2013, Ecology letters.

[39]  I. Moore,et al.  Digital terrain modelling: A review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications , 1991 .

[40]  J. L. Parra,et al.  Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas , 2005 .

[41]  T. Stévart,et al.  Subsampling Herbarium Collections to Assess Geographic Diversity Gradients: A Case Study with Endemic Orchidaceae and Rubiaceae in Cameroon , 2012 .

[42]  Dengwu Li,et al.  Elevational Patterns of Plant Richness in the Taibai Mountain, China , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[43]  C. E. González‐Orozco,et al.  Distorted perception of the spatial distribution of plant diversity through uneven collecting efforts: the example of Asteraceae in Australia , 2012 .

[44]  C. McCain,et al.  Elevational Gradients in Species Richness , 2010 .

[45]  J. Beaman,et al.  Elevational species richness patterns for vascular plants on Mount Kinabalu, Borneo , 2006 .

[46]  Jingyun Fang,et al.  Altitudinal patterns of seed plant richness in the Gaoligong Mountains, south‐east Tibet, China , 2007 .

[47]  P. Hulme,et al.  Environmental gradients shift the direction of the relationship between native and alien plant species richness , 2013 .

[48]  P. Hollingsworth,et al.  Conservation Priorities in a Biodiversity Hotspot: Analysis of Narrow Endemic Plant Species in New Caledonia , 2013, PloS one.

[49]  A. Newton,et al.  Species Distribution Modeling in the Tropics: Problems, Potentialities, and the Role of Biological Data for Effective Species Conservation , 2009 .

[50]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  The accuracy of plant assemblage prediction from species distribution models varies along environmental gradients , 2013 .

[51]  G. Mroz,et al.  Microclimate in Forest Ecosystem and Landscape Ecology , 1999 .

[52]  Robert P. Anderson,et al.  Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions , 2006 .

[53]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology , 2000 .

[54]  Serge Rambal,et al.  Downscaling MODIS-derived maps using GIS and boosted regression trees: The case of frost occurrence over the arid Andean highlands of Bolivia , 2011 .