Breath Powered Nasal Delivery: A New Route to Rapid Headache Relief

The nose offers an attractive noninvasive alternative for drug delivery. Nasal anatomy, with a large mucosal surface area and high vascularity, allows for rapid systemic absorption and other potential benefits. However, the complex nasal geometry, including the narrow anterior valve, poses a serious challenge to efficient drug delivery. This barrier, plus the inherent limitations of traditional nasal delivery mechanisms, has precluded achievement of the full potential of nasal delivery. Breath Powered bi‐directional delivery, a simple but novel nasal delivery mechanism, overcomes these barriers. This innovative mechanism has now been applied to the delivery of sumatriptan. Multiple studies of drug deposition, including comparisons of traditional nasal sprays to Breath Powered delivery, demonstrate significantly improved deposition to superior and posterior intranasal target sites beyond the nasal valve. Pharmacokinetic studies in both healthy subjects and migraineurs suggest that improved deposition of sumatriptan translates into improved absorption and pharmacokinetics. Importantly, the absorption profile is shifted toward a more pronounced early peak, representing nasal absorption, with a reduced late peak, representing predominantly gastrointestinal (GI) absorption. The flattening and “spreading out” of the GI peak appears more pronounced in migraine sufferers than healthy volunteers, likely reflecting impaired GI absorption described in migraineurs. In replicated clinical trials, Breath Powered delivery of low‐dose sumatriptan was well accepted and well tolerated by patients, and onset of pain relief was faster than generally reported in previous trials with noninjectable triptans. Interestingly, Breath Powered delivery also allows for the potential of headache‐targeted medications to be better delivered to the trigeminal nerve and the sphenopalatine ganglion, potentially improving treatment of various types of headache. In brief, Breath Powered bi‐directional intranasal delivery offers a new and more efficient mechanism for nasal drug delivery, providing an attractive option for improved treatment of headaches by enabling or enhancing the benefits of current and future headache therapies.

[1]  R. Cady,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of AVP-825, a Novel Breath-PoweredTM Powder Sumatriptan Intranasal Treatment, for Acute Migraine (I9-2.002) , 2014 .

[2]  D. Magis,et al.  Migraine prevention with a supraorbital transcutaneous stimulator , 2013, Neurology.

[3]  P. Djupesland,et al.  Improved Pharmacokinetics of Sumatriptan With Breath Powered™ Nasal Delivery of Sumatriptan Powder , 2013, Headache.

[4]  P. Goadsby Sphenopalatine (pterygopalatine) ganglion stimulation and cluster headache: New hope for ye who enter here , 2013, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[5]  U. Erkorkmaz,et al.  Comparison of the use of the Valsalva maneuver and the eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA®) to relieve venipuncture pain: a randomized controlled trial , 2013, Journal of Anesthesia.

[6]  S. Papapetropoulos,et al.  Gastric stasis in migraineurs: Etiology, characteristics, and clinical and therapeutic implications , 2013, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[7]  H. Ulvi,et al.  Assessment of nasal parameters in determination of olfactory dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease , 2013, The Journal of international medical research.

[8]  A. May,et al.  Stimulation of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) for cluster headache treatment. Pathway CH-1: A randomized, sham-controlled study , 2013, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[9]  P. Djupesland Nasal drug delivery devices: characteristics and performance in a clinical perspective—a review , 2012, Drug Delivery and Translational Research.

[10]  J. Lennerz,et al.  CGRP and NO in the Trigeminal System: Mechanisms and Role in Headache Generation , 2012, Headache.

[11]  A. Skretting,et al.  Nasal deposition and clearance in man: comparison of a bidirectional powder device and a traditional liquid spray pump. , 2012, Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery.

[12]  M. Ferrari,et al.  Immunohistochemical characterization of calcitonin gene-related peptide in the trigeminal system of the familial hemiplegic migraine 1 knock-in mouse , 2011, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[13]  J. Ivanusic,et al.  Peripheral Targets of 5‐HT1D Receptor Immunoreactive Trigeminal Ganglion Neurons , 2011, Headache.

[14]  B. Van der Schueren,et al.  No arguments for increased endothelial nitric oxide synthase activity in migraine based on peripheral biomarkers , 2010, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[15]  P. Djupesland,et al.  Intranasal sumatriptan powder delivered by a novel breath-actuated bi-directional device for the acute treatment of migraine: A randomised, placebo-controlled study , 2010, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[16]  W. Möller,et al.  Pulsating aerosols for drug delivery to the sinuses in healthy volunteers , 2010, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[17]  R. Cady,et al.  Elevated Saliva Calcitonin Gene‐Related Peptide Levels During Acute Migraine Predict Therapeutic Response to Rizatriptan , 2009, Headache.

[18]  Arne Skretting,et al.  A new method for scintigraphic quantification of deposition and clearance in anatomical regions of the human nose , 2009, Nuclear medicine communications.

[19]  A. Bertolini,et al.  Interindividual variability of oral sumatriptan pharmacokinetics and of clinical response in migraine patients , 2008, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[20]  P. Durham,et al.  Effect of Carbon Dioxide on Calcitonin Gene‐Related Peptide Secretion From Trigeminal Neurons , 2007, Headache.

[21]  A. Dowson,et al.  Patient Preference for Triptan Formulations: A Prospective Study With Zolmitriptan , 2007, Headache.

[22]  W. Fokkens,et al.  Influence of anatomy and head position on intranasal drug deposition , 2006, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head & Neck.

[23]  R. Cady,et al.  Salivary Levels of CGRP and VIP in Rhinosinusitis and Migraine Patients , 2006, Headache.

[24]  P. Goadsby,et al.  Zolmitriptan Intranasal: A Review of the Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Efficacy , 2006, Headache.

[25]  M. Kågedal,et al.  True nasopharyngeal absorption of zolmitriptan after administration via nasal spray in healthy male volunteers , 2005 .

[26]  J. Aschoff,et al.  Zolmitriptan 5 mg Nasal Spray: Efficacy and Onset of Action in the Acute Treatment of Migraine—Results From Phase 1 of the REALIZE Study , 2005, Headache.

[27]  Trond Holand,et al.  Bi-directional nasal delivery of aerosols can prevent lung deposition. , 2004, Journal of aerosol medicine : the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine.

[28]  A. C. Cardozo,et al.  The assessment of topical nasal drug distribution. , 2004, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[29]  A. Fox Onset of Effect of 5‐HT1B/1D Agonists: A Model With Pharmacokinetic Validation , 2004, Headache.

[30]  G. Fabbrini,et al.  Unilateral Cranial Autonomic Symptoms in Migraine , 2002, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[31]  N. Santanello,et al.  Determinants of Patient Satisfaction With Migraine Therapy , 2000, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[32]  M. Maizels,et al.  Intranasal Lidocaine for Migraine: A Randomized Trial and Open‐Label Follow‐up , 1999, Headache.

[33]  N. Cutler,et al.  Oral Sumatriptan Pharmacokinetics in the Migraine State , 1999 .

[34]  E. Fuseau,et al.  Comparative clinical pharmacokinetics of single doses of sumatriptan following subcutaneous, oral, rectal and intranasal administration. , 1998, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[35]  M. Asgharnejad,et al.  Sumatriptan nasal spray for the acute treatment of migraine , 1997, Neurology.

[36]  J. Olesen,et al.  311C90 (Zolmitriptan), A Novel Centrally and Peripheral Acting Oral 5-Hydroxytryptamine-1D Agonist: A Comparison of Its Absorption During A Migraine Attack and in A Migraine-Free Period , 1996, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[37]  J. Olesen,et al.  The Nitric Oxide Hypothesis of Migraine and Other Vascular Headaches , 1995, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[38]  J. Sandweiss,et al.  Rapid and Sustained Relief of Migraine Attacks With Intranasal Lidocaine: Preliminary Findings , 1995, Headache.

[39]  C. Dahlöf,et al.  Intranasal sumatriptan for the acute treatment of migraine , 1994, Journal of Neurology.

[40]  J. Hardebo,et al.  Nerves And Vessels In The Pterygopalatine Fossa And Symptoms Of Cluster Headache , 1987, Headache.

[41]  R. Luthringer,et al.  Rapid absorption of sumatriptan powder and effects on glyceryl trinitrate model of headache following intranasal delivery using a novel bi-directional device. , 2009, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[42]  T. Casale,et al.  Intranasal noninhaled carbon dioxide for the symptomatic treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. , 2008, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[43]  G. Eby Strong humming for one hour daily to terminate chronic rhinosinusitis in four days: a case report and hypothesis for action by stimulation of endogenous nasal nitric oxide production. , 2006, Medical hypotheses.

[44]  S. Tepper,et al.  Intranasal Medications for the Treatment of Migraine and Cluster Headache , 2004, CNS drugs.

[45]  A. Dowson,et al.  Speed of Onset and Efficacy of Zolmitriptan Nasal Spray in the Acute Treatment of Migraine , 2003, CNS drugs.

[46]  E. Fuseau,et al.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Intranasal Sumatriptan , 2002, Clinical pharmacokinetics.