Computer-Supported Assessment for Tailoring Assistive Technology

The main purpose of assistive technology is to support an individual's daily activities, in order to increase ability, autonomy, relatedness and quality of life. The aim for the work presented in this article is to develop automated methods to tailor the behavior of the assistive technology for the purpose to provide just-in-time, adaptive interventions targeting multiple domains. This requires methods for representing and updating the user model, including goals, preferences, abilities, activity and its situation. We focus the assessment and intervention tasks typically performed by therapists and provide knowledge-based technology for supporting the process. A formative evaluation study was conducted as a part of a participatory action research process, involving two rehabilitation experts, two young individuals and one senior individual as end-user participants, in addition to knowledge engineers. The main contribution of this work is a theory-based method for assessing the individual's goals, preferences, abilities and motives, which is used for building a holistic user model. The user model is continuously updated and functions as the base for tailoring the system's assistive behavior during intervention and follow-up.

[1]  Ingeborg Nilsson,et al.  Towards user-authored agent dialogues for assessment in personalised ambient assisted living , 2013, Int. J. Web Eng. Technol..

[2]  Esteban Guerrero,et al.  An activity-centric argumentation framework for assistive technology aimed at improving health , 2016, Argument Comput..

[3]  Esteban Guerrero,et al.  Activity Qualifiers in an Argumentation Framework as Instruments for Agents When Evaluating Human Activity , 2016, PAAMS.

[4]  Paul Taylor,et al.  Evaluation of PROforma as a language for implementing medical guidelines in a practical context , 2006, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[5]  Federica Cena,et al.  User model interoperability: a survey , 2011, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[6]  Judy Kay,et al.  Challenges and Solutions of Ubiquitous User Modeling , 2012, Ubiquitous Display Environments.

[7]  Juan Carlos Nieves,et al.  Modeling Actions Based on a Situative Space Model for Recognizing Human Activities , 2012, AIMSA.

[8]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[9]  Helena Lindgren,et al.  Human-Agent Dialogues on Health Topics - An Evaluation Study , 2015, PAAMS.

[10]  Lars Bäckman,et al.  A 2 year multidomain intervention of diet, exercise, cognitive training, and vascular risk monitoring versus control to prevent cognitive decline in at-risk elderly people (FINGER): a randomised controlled trial , 2015, The Lancet.

[11]  Helena Lindgren,et al.  Kitchen AS-A-PAL: Exploring Smart Objects as Containers, Surfaces and Actuators , 2013, ISAmI.

[12]  Helena Lindgren,et al.  A Model for Interaction Design of Personalised Knowledge Systems in the Health Domain , 2010, eHealth.

[13]  C. Kennedy,et al.  Active Assistance Technology for Health-Related Behavior Change: An Interdisciplinary Review , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[14]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Moving on from Weiser's Vision of Calm Computing: Engaging UbiComp Experiences , 2006, UbiComp.

[15]  K. Baron The Model of Human Occupation , 1987 .

[16]  Silvia Miksch,et al.  Bridging the Gap Between Informal and Formal Guideline Representations , 2006, ECAI.

[17]  Lillemor Lundin-Olsson,et al.  End Users Transforming Experiences into Formal Information and Process Models for Personalised Health Interventions , 2014, MIE.

[18]  Harri Oinas-Kukkonen,et al.  Behavior Change Support Systems: A Research Model and Agenda , 2010, PERSUASIVE.

[19]  Victor Kaptelinin,et al.  Computer-mediated activity: functional organs in social and developmental contexts , 1995 .

[20]  Sylvain Giroux,et al.  Personalization in Smart Homes for Disabled People , 2008, 2008 Second International Conference on Future Generation Communication and Networking.

[21]  Helena Lindgren,et al.  Domain Experts Tailoring Interaction to Users - An Evaluation Study , 2011, INTERACT.

[22]  Helena Lindgren,et al.  Agent-Supported Assessment for Adaptive and Personalized Ambient Assisted Living , 2011, PAAMS.

[23]  Helena Lindgren,et al.  Towards personalised support for monitoring and improving health in risky environments , 2013 .

[24]  Ulises Cortés,et al.  Using Scenarios to Draft the Support of Intelligent Tools for Frail Elders in the SHARE-it Approach , 2009, IWANN.

[25]  Ramón Cáceres,et al.  Ubicomp Systems at 20: Progress, Opportunities, and Challenges , 2012, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[26]  Helena Lindgren,et al.  ACKTUS: A Platform for Developing Personalized Support Systems in the Health Domain , 2015, Digital Health.

[27]  Ulises Cortés,et al.  A Flexible Agent-Oriented Solution to Model Organisational and Normative Requirements in Assistive Technologies , 2010, CCIA.

[28]  Takahiro A. Kato,et al.  Hikikomori as a possible clinical term in psychiatry: a questionnaire survey , 2012, BMC Psychiatry.

[29]  Judy McKay,et al.  The dual imperatives of action research , 2001, Inf. Technol. People.

[30]  Helena Lindgren,et al.  Cognitive Architecture of an Agent for Human-Agent Dialogues , 2014, PAAMS.

[31]  R. Poulton,et al.  Lifetime risk of depression: restricted to a minority or waiting for most? , 2005, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[32]  Alfred Kobsa,et al.  Generic User Modeling Systems , 2001, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[33]  Esteban Guerrero,et al.  ALI, an ambient assisted living system for supporting behavior change , 2013 .

[34]  Reedchris,et al.  Towards an argument interchange format , 2006 .

[35]  M. Prince,et al.  World Alzheimer Report 2015 - The Global Impact of Dementia: An analysis of prevalence, incidence, cost and trends , 2015 .

[36]  David Sánchez,et al.  Agents applied in health care: A review , 2010, Int. J. Medical Informatics.