Signals in Science - on the Importance of Signaling in Gaining Attention in Science
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] H. P. Dalen,et al. How Influential Are Demography Journals , 1999 .
[2] George A. Akerlof. The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism , 1970 .
[3] Wolfgang Glänzel,et al. A bibliometric study on ageing and reception processes of scientific literature , 1995, J. Inf. Sci..
[4] Hendrik P. van Dalen,et al. What makes a scientific article influential? The case of demographers , 2001, Scientometrics.
[5] Robert D. Tollison,et al. Dry Holes in Economic Research , 2003 .
[6] David P. Hamilton. Publishing by--and for?--the numbers. , 1990, Science.
[7] Kène Henkens,et al. What Makes a Scientific article Influential , 2000 .
[8] S. Lynch,et al. Success and Future of Demography , 2001, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
[9] J. Gans,et al. How Are the Mighty Fallen: Rejected Classic Articles by Leading Economists , 1994 .
[10] R. Blank. The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review , 1991 .
[11] H. Schuman,et al. Citation counts and social comparisons: Scientists' use and evaluation of citation index data , 1990 .
[12] H. P. Dalen,et al. Attention and the art of scientific publishing , 2001 .
[13] R. Merton. The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.
[14] D. Laband. Is There Value-Added from the Review Process in Economics?: Preliminary Evidence from Authors , 1990 .
[15] Daniel S. Hamermesh,et al. Facts and Myths about Refereeing , 1994 .
[16] ANTHONY F. J. VAN RAAN,et al. Sleeping Beauties in science , 2004, Scientometrics.
[17] Kène Henkens,et al. Demographers and Their Journals: Who Remains Uncited After Ten Years? , 2004 .
[18] Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al. Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .
[19] S. Baldi. Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations : A network-analytic model , 1998 .
[20] Russell B. Korobkin,et al. Ranking Journals: Some Thoughts on Theory and Methodology , 1999 .
[21] Wolfgang Glänzel,et al. Better late than never? On the chance to become highly cited only beyond the standard bibliometric time horizon , 2004, Scientometrics.
[22] Publishing as prostitution , 2002 .
[23] David P. Hamilton. Research papers: who's uncited now? , 1991, Science.
[24] David N. Laband,et al. Favoritism versus Search for Good Papers: Empirical Evidence Regarding the Behavior of Journal Editors , 1994, Journal of Political Economy.
[25] A. Siow. Some evidence on the signalling role of research in academia , 1997 .
[26] Paula E. Stephan. The Economics of Science , 1996 .
[27] J. A. Stewart,et al. Achievement and Ascriptive Processes in the Recognition of Scientific Articles , 1983 .
[28] Joel Waldfogel,et al. A Citation-Based Test for Discrimination at Economics and Finance Journals , 1996 .
[29] B. Frey,et al. Publishing as Prostitution? Choosing between One's Own Ideas and Academic Failure , 2002 .