Estimation of plasma insulin concentration under glycemic variability using nonlinear filtering techniques

The ultimate goal of an artificial pancreas is finding the optimal insulin rates that can effectively reduce high blood glucose (BG) levels in type 1 diabetic patients. To achieve this, most closed-loop control strategies need to compute the optimal insulin action on the basis of precedent glucose and insulin levels. Unlike glucose levels which can be measured in real-time, unavailability of insulin sensors makes it essential the use of mathematical models to estimate plasma insulin concentrations. Between others, filtering techniques based on a generalization of the Kalman filter (KF) have been the most widely applied in the estimation of hidden states in nonlinear dynamic systems. Nevertheless, poor predictability of BG levels is a key issue since the glucose-insulin dynamics presents great inter- and intra-patient variability. Here, the question arises as to whether glycemic variability is not properly taken into account in models formulations and whether or it would compromise proper estimation of plasma insulin concentration. In order to tackle this point, a deterministic model describing glucose-insulin interaction plus a stochastic process to account for BG fluctuations were incorporated into the extended (EKF), cubature (CKF) and unscented (UKF) configurations of the Kalman filter to provide an estimate of the plasma insulin concentration. We found that for low glycemic variability, insulin state estimation can be attained with acceptable accuracy; however, as glycemic variability rises, Kalman filters rapidly degrade their performance as a consequence of large nonlinearities.

[1]  Mariano De Paula,et al.  Controlling blood glucose variability under uncertainty using reinforcement learning and Gaussian processes , 2015, Appl. Soft Comput..

[2]  Marc D. Breton,et al.  Modular Closed-Loop Control of Diabetes , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  G M Steil,et al.  Modeling insulin action for development of a closed-loop artificial pancreas. , 2005, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[4]  R. E. Kalman,et al.  A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems , 2002 .

[5]  Rudolph van der Merwe,et al.  The unscented Kalman filter for nonlinear estimation , 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE 2000 Adaptive Systems for Signal Processing, Communications, and Control Symposium (Cat. No.00EX373).

[6]  Bor Yann Liaw,et al.  A novel on-board state-of-charge estimation method for aged Li-ion batteries based on model adaptive extended Kalman filter , 2014 .

[7]  Fredrik Gustafsson,et al.  Some Relations Between Extended and Unscented Kalman Filters , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[9]  Frits Holleman,et al.  Glucose variability; does it matter? , 2010, Endocrine reviews.

[10]  Eyal Dassau,et al.  Bolus calculator: a review of four "smart" insulin pumps. , 2008, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[11]  Ali Cinar,et al.  Real-time insulin bolusing for unannounced meals with artificial pancreas , 2017 .

[12]  Hyung-Jeong Yang,et al.  HOKF: High Order Kalman Filter for Epilepsy Forecasting Modeling , 2017, Biosyst..

[13]  D. Simon Optimal State Estimation: Kalman, H Infinity, and Nonlinear Approaches , 2006 .

[14]  Subhojit Ghosh,et al.  A constrained sub‐optimal controller for glucose regulation in type 1 diabetes mellitus , 2014 .

[15]  Radhakant Padhi,et al.  Optimal blood glucose regulation of diabetic patients using single network adaptive critics , 2011 .

[16]  Howard C. Zisser,et al.  Outcome Measures for Artificial Pancreas Clinical Trials: A Consensus Report , 2016, Diabetes Care.

[17]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Probabilistic robotics , 2002, CACM.

[18]  J. C. Kuenen,et al.  Real-life glycaemic profiles in non-diabetic individuals with low fasting glucose and normal HbA1c: the A1C-Derived Average Glucose (ADAG) study , 2010, Diabetologia.

[19]  Ljupco Kocarev,et al.  Lie Derivatives and Dynamical Systems , 1998 .

[20]  R. Hovorka,et al.  Nonlinear model predictive control of glucose concentration in subjects with type 1 diabetes. , 2004, Physiological measurement.

[21]  Cynthia R. Marling,et al.  Characterizing Blood Glucose Variability Using New Metrics with Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data , 2011, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[22]  J. Ulbrecht,et al.  Personalized State-space Modeling of Glucose Dynamics for Type 1 Diabetes Using Continuously Monitored Glucose, Insulin Dose, and Meal Intake , 2014, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[23]  C S Hughes,et al.  Anticipating the next meal using meal behavioral profiles: A hybrid model-based stochastic predictive control algorithm for T1DM , 2011, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[24]  Giovanni Sparacino,et al.  “Smart” Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensors: On-Line Signal Processing Issues , 2010, Sensors.

[25]  Greg Welch,et al.  An Introduction to Kalman Filter , 1995, SIGGRAPH 2001.

[26]  Chatchai Neatpisarnvanit,et al.  Estimation of plasma insulin from plasma glucose , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  S. Haykin,et al.  Cubature Kalman Filters , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[28]  Yang Kuang,et al.  Mathematical models and software tools for the glucose-insulin regulatory system and diabetes: an overview , 2006 .

[29]  Christoph Ament,et al.  The Unscented Kalman Filter estimates the plasma insulin from glucose measurement , 2011, Biosyst..

[30]  H. Vorster,et al.  Intra- and inter-individual variation in blood glucose response to white bread and glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus , 2003 .

[31]  Beatriz Ricarte,et al.  Real-time estimation of plasma insulin concentration from continuous glucose monitor measurements , 2016, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.