The Hidden Image of the City: Sensing Community Well-Being from Urban Mobility

A key facet of urban design, planning, and monitoring is measuring communities' well-being. Historically, researchers have established a link between well-being and visibility of city neighbourhoods and have measured visibility via quantitative studies with willing participants, a process that is invariably manual and cumbersome. However, the influx of the world's population into urban centres now calls for methods that can easily be implemented, scaled, and analysed. We propose that one such method is offered by pervasive technology: we test whether urban mobility--as measured by public transport fare collection sensors--is a viable proxy for the visibility of a city's communities. We validate this hypothesis by examining the correlation between London urban flow of public transport and census-based indices of the well-being of London's census areas. We find that not only are the two correlated, but a number of insights into the flow between areas of varying social standing can be uncovered with readily available transport data. For example, we find that deprived areas tend to preferentially attract people living in other deprived areas, suggesting a segregation effect.

[1]  Licia Capra,et al.  Mining Public Transport Usage for Personalised Intelligent Transport Systems , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.

[2]  Anil Bawa-Cavia,et al.  Sensing the Urban Using location-based social network data in urban analysis Working , 2011 .

[3]  P. Cochat,et al.  Et al , 2008, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[4]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Reality mining: sensing complex social systems , 2006, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[5]  Víctor Soto,et al.  Prediction of socioeconomic levels using cell phone records , 2011, UMAP'11.

[6]  Stanley Milgram,et al.  The individual in a social world , 2010 .

[7]  Josep Blat,et al.  Digital Footprinting: Uncovering Tourists with User-Generated Content , 2008, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[8]  Peter Lynn Maintaining cross-sectional representativeness in a longitudinal general population survey , 2011 .

[9]  Kyumin Lee,et al.  Exploring Millions of Footprints in Location Sharing Services , 2011, ICWSM.

[10]  Jose L. Marzo,et al.  User Modeling, Adaption and Personalization - 19th International Conference, UMAP 2011, Girona, Spain, July 11-15, 2011. Proceedings , 2011, UMAP.

[11]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Understanding individual human mobility patterns , 2008, Nature.

[12]  Daniele Quercia,et al.  Tracking "gross community happiness" from tweets , 2012, CSCW.

[13]  N. Eagle,et al.  Network Diversity and Economic Development , 2010, Science.

[14]  Xing Xie,et al.  Urban computing with taxicabs , 2011, UbiComp '11.

[15]  Licia Capra,et al.  How smart is your smartcard?: measuring travel behaviours, perceptions, and incentives , 2011, UbiComp '11.

[16]  Nuria Oliver,et al.  Sensing and predicting the pulse of the city through shared bicycling , 2009, IJCAI 2009.

[17]  Kevin Lynch,et al.  The Image of the City , 1960 .

[18]  C. Dibben,et al.  The English indices of deprivation 2004 , 2011 .

[19]  Cecilia Mascolo,et al.  EmotionSense: a mobile phones based adaptive platform for experimental social psychology research , 2010, UbiComp.