Wireless Visions: Infrastructure, Imagination, and US Spectrum Policy

Effective use of spectrum is essential to the forms of mobile, ubiquitous, and social computing that increasingly shape and define CSCW research. This paper calls attention to the key policy processes by which the future of wireless spectrum -- and the forms of technology design and use that depend on it -- is being imagined, shaped, and contested. We review CSCW and HCI scholarship arguing for infrastructure and policy as important but neglected sites of CSCW analysis, and separate lines of work arguing for "sociotechnical imaginaries" as key sites and outcomes of technology policy and design. We then turn to histories of U.S. spectrum regulation, before analyzing ongoing FCC policy actions around incentive auctions and unlicensed spectrum use. We argue that such processes are central to the imagination and future of mobile computing; and that CSCW can benefit from adding such policy concerns to its traditional repertoires of design and use.

[1]  S. Marshall.  Modern Social Imaginaries , 2005 .

[2]  Matthew Chalmers,et al.  Seamful interweaving: heterogeneity in the theory and design of interactive systems , 2004, DIS '04.

[3]  William W. Gaver.  Making spaces: how design workbooks work , 2011, CHI.

[4]  S. Jasanoff,et al.  Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea , 2009 .

[5]  P. Sabatier.  An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein , 1988 .

[6]  Eric Paulos,et al.  Sensr: evaluating a flexible framework for authoring mobile data-collection tools for citizen science , 2013, CSCW.

[7]  Marcus Foth,et al.  Urban informatics , 2011, CSCW.

[8]  Steven J. Jackson,et al.  Why CSCW needs science policy (and vice versa) , 2013, CSCW.

[9]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  The anatomy of prototypes: Prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas , 2008, TCHI.

[10]  Eric Baumer,et al.  Prescriptive persuasion and open-ended social awareness: expanding the design space of mobile health , 2012, CSCW.

[11]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[12]  David Marsh,et al.  New directions in the study of policy networks , 1992 .

[13]  B. David.  The iron cage revisited : Institutional isomorphism and collec... , 2007 .

[14]  A. Goodman,et al.  Genetic Nature/Culture: Anthropology and Science beyond the Two-Culture Divide , 2003 .

[15]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Reflective design , 2005, Critical Computing.

[16]  Mark J. Perry,et al.  Amateur vision and recreational orientation:: creating live video together , 2012, CSCW '12.

[17]  Silvia Lindtner,et al.  Cultural appropriation: information technologies as sites of transnational imagination , 2012, CSCW.

[18]  Susan J. Douglas,et al.  From Inventing American Broadcasting , 2008 .

[19]  Eric Monteiro,et al.  From Artefacts to Infrastructures , 2013, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[20]  Robert B. Horwitz,et al.  The Irony of Regulatory Reform: The Deregulation of American Telecommunications , 1988 .

[21]  Robert B. Horwitz,et al.  Broadcast Reform Revisited: Reverend Everett C. Parker and the "Standing" Case (Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ v. Federal Communications Commission) , 1997 .

[22]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live by , 1982 .

[23]  Mark W. Newman,et al.  The infrastructure problem in HCI , 2010, CHI.

[24]  Hernan Galperin,et al.  Beyond Interests, Ideas, and Technology: An Institutional Approach to Communication and Information Policy , 2004, Inf. Soc..

[25]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Divining a Digital Future - Mess and Mythology in Ubiquitous Computing , 2011 .

[26]  Ellie Harmon,et al.  Stories of the Smartphone in everyday discourse: conflict, tension & instability , 2013, CHI.

[27]  E. Romanelli,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1992 .

[28]  Robert Friedel,et al.  Inventing American Broadcasting 1899-1922 , 1989 .

[29]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation , 2006, DIS '06.

[30]  Kristen Jakobsen Osenga,et al.  The Internet is Not a Super Highway: Using Metaphors to Communicate Information and Communications Policy , 2013, Journal of Information Policy.

[31]  Sandra Payette,et al.  The policy knot: re-integrating policy, practice and design in cscw studies of social computing , 2014, CSCW.

[32]  Jon M. Peha,et al.  Sharing Spectrum Through Spectrum Policy Reform and Cognitive Radio , 2009, Proceedings of the IEEE.