Computational Barthel Index: an automated tool for assessing and predicting activities of daily living among nursing home patients

Background Assessment of functional ability, including activities of daily living (ADLs), is a manual process completed by skilled health professionals. In the presented research, an automated decision support tool, the Computational Barthel Index Tool (CBIT), was constructed that can automatically assess and predict probabilities of current and future ADLs based on patients’ medical history. Methods The data used to construct the tool include the demographic information, inpatient and outpatient diagnosis codes, and reported disabilities of 181,213 residents of the Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA) Community Living Centers. Supervised machine learning methods were applied to construct the CBIT. Temporal information about times from the first and the most recent occurrence of diagnoses was encoded. Ten-fold cross-validation was used to tune hyperparameters, and independent test sets were used to evaluate models using AUC, accuracy, recall and precision. Random forest achieved the best model quality. Models were calibrated using isotonic regression. Results The unabridged version of CBIT uses 578 patient characteristics and achieved average AUC of 0.94 (0.93–0.95), accuracy of 0.90 (0.89–0.91), precision of 0.91 (0.89–0.92), and recall of 0.90 (0.84–0.95) when re-evaluating patients. CBIT is also capable of predicting ADLs up to one year ahead, with accuracy decreasing over time, giving average AUC of 0.77 (0.73–0.79), accuracy of 0.73 (0.69–0.80), precision of 0.74 (0.66–0.81), and recall of 0.69 (0.34–0.96). A simplified version of CBIT with 50 top patient characteristics reached performance that does not significantly differ from full CBIT. Conclusion Discharge planners, disability application reviewers and clinicians evaluating comparative effectiveness of treatments can use CBIT to assess and predict information on functional status of patients.

[1]  Roozbeh Jafari,et al.  Personalizing Activity Recognition Models Through Quantifying Different Types of Uncertainty Using Wearable Sensors , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  S. Bandinelli,et al.  Development of a clinical prediction model for the onset of functional decline in people aged 65–75 years: pooled analysis of four European cohort studies , 2019, BMC Geriatrics.

[3]  J. Ozawa,et al.  Clinical Prediction Rule for Declines in Activities of Daily Living at 6 Months After Surgery for Hip Fracture Repair. , 2016, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  Dinesh Kumar Vishwakarma,et al.  A review of state-of-the-art techniques for abnormal human activity recognition , 2019, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[5]  Gwenn Englebienne,et al.  Delta Features From Ambient Sensor Data are Good Predictors of Change in Functional Health , 2017, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[6]  Hilde van der Togt,et al.  Publisher's Note , 2003, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[7]  A. Chouhan,et al.  Smart home based ambient assisted living: Recognition of anomaly in the activity of daily living for an elderly living alone , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC).

[8]  Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe,et al.  Technology-Enabled Assessment of Functional Health , 2019, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Bagging Predictors , 1996, Machine Learning.

[10]  B Cooper,et al.  Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. , 1989, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[11]  Kimiaki Shirahama,et al.  Rank Pooling Approach for Wearable Sensor-Based ADLs Recognition , 2020, Sensors.

[12]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[13]  Quan Z. Sheng,et al.  A review and categorization of techniques on device-free human activity recognition , 2020, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[14]  Chris Phillips,et al.  Inferring Micro-Activities Using Wearable Sensing for ADL Recognition of Home-Care Patients , 2020, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[15]  Ig-Jae Kim,et al.  Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensors for Elder Care , 2008, 2008 Second International Conference on Future Generation Communication and Networking.

[16]  S. D. de Rooij,et al.  A systematic review of predictors and screening instruments to identify older hospitalized patients at risk for functional decline. , 2007, Journal of clinical nursing.

[17]  Health‐Related Quality of Life and Functional Status Quality Indicators for Older Persons with Multiple Chronic Conditions , 2013, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[18]  E. McCarthy,et al.  Dying with Cancer: Patients' Function, Symptoms, and Care Preferences as Death Approaches , 2000, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[19]  Tiejun Liu,et al.  Value of the Barthel scale in prognostic prediction for patients with cerebral infarction , 2020, BMC Cardiovascular Disorders.

[20]  M. Kivimäki,et al.  Age-related trajectories of physical functioning in work and retirement: the role of sociodemographic factors, lifestyle and disease , 2014, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[21]  F. Mahoney,et al.  Functional evaluation ; the Barthel index. A simple index of the independence useful in scoring improvement in the rehabilitation of the chronically ill. , 1965 .

[22]  Radosveta Sokullu,et al.  IoT supported smart home for the elderly , 2020, Internet Things.

[23]  Allison E. Williams,et al.  Shared Homes as an Alternative to Nursing Home Care: Impact of VA's Medical Foster Home Program on Hospitalization. , 2016, The Gerontologist.

[24]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[25]  Ricardo L. Armentano,et al.  Editorial Preface: Special issue on IoT for eHealth, elderly and aging , 2019 .

[26]  Farrokh Alemi,et al.  Predicting Functional Decline and Recovery for Residents in Veterans Affairs Nursing Homes. , 2016, The Gerontologist.

[27]  H Asadi,et al.  eDoctor: machine learning and the future of medicine , 2018, Journal of internal medicine.

[28]  Prognosis and prognostic factors in ADL-dependent stroke patients during their first in-patient rehabilitation – a prospective multicentre study , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation.

[29]  Hua Min,et al.  Predicting activities of daily living for cancer patients using an ontology-guided machine learning methodology , 2017, Journal of Biomedical Semantics.

[30]  R. Gobbens,et al.  The Prediction of ADL and IADL Disability Using Six Physical Indicators of Frailty: A Longitudinal Study in the Netherlands , 2014, Current gerontology and geriatrics research.

[31]  B. Prendergast,et al.  Advances in transcatheter mitral and tricuspid therapies , 2020, BMC Cardiovascular Disorders.

[32]  H. Hong,et al.  New Composite Measure for ADL Limitations: Application to Predicting Nursing Home Placement for Michigan MI Choice Clients , 2019, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[33]  D. Wade,et al.  The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. , 1988, International disability studies.

[34]  Sajal K. Das,et al.  A-Wristocracy: Deep learning on wrist-worn sensing for recognition of user complex activities , 2015, 2015 IEEE 12th International Conference on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN).

[35]  M. Dietrich,et al.  Predicting 1-year disability and mortality of injured older adults. , 2018, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[36]  Abraham J. Wyner,et al.  Making Sense of Random Forest Probabilities: a Kernel Perspective , 2018, ArXiv.

[37]  J. Morris,et al.  Reliability estimates for the Minimum Data Set for nursing home resident assessment and care screening (MDS). , 1995, The Gerontologist.

[38]  Allison E. Williams,et al.  Sequence of Functional Loss and Recovery in Nursing Homes. , 2016, The Gerontologist.

[39]  P. K. Nizar Banu,et al.  Single Activity Recognition System: A Review , 2020 .

[40]  Jian Liu,et al.  Classification of Daily Activities for the Elderly Using Wearable Sensors , 2017, Journal of healthcare engineering.

[41]  Yutaka Arakawa,et al.  Predicting Occurrence Time of Daily Living Activities Through Time Series Analysis of Smart Home Data , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops).

[42]  Lorenzo Scalise,et al.  ADLs Monitoring by Accelerometer-Based Wearable Sensors: Effect of Measurement Device and Data Uncertainty on Classification Accuracy , 2020, 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA).

[43]  Elizabeth H Bradley,et al.  Understanding the treatment preferences of seriously ill patients. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[44]  Mario Giacobini,et al.  Predictive Modeling for Frailty Conditions in Elderly People: Machine Learning Approaches , 2019, JMIR medical informatics.

[45]  Gert Kwakkel,et al.  Early Prediction of Outcome of Activities of Daily Living After Stroke: A Systematic Review , 2011, Stroke.

[46]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.