Economic Value of Walkability Economic Value of Walkability

There are ways to quantify the value of walking (the activity) and walkability (the quality of walking conditions, including safety, comfort, and convenience). Walking and walkability provide a variety of benefits, including accessibility, consumer cost savings, public cost savings (reduced external costs), more efficient land use, community livability, improved fitness and public health, economic development, and support for equity objectives. Yet current transportation planning practices tend to undervalue walking. More comprehensive analysis techniques are likely to increase public support for walking and other nonmotorized modes of travel.

[1]  Mark A. Delucchi,et al.  A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON THE SOCIAL COST OF MOTOR VEHICLE USE IN THE UNITED STATES , 1998 .

[2]  R J Lanzafame,et al.  "Getting there". , 1998, Journal of clinical laser medicine & surgery.

[3]  Anthony Downs,et al.  The Costs of Sprawl-Revisited , 1998 .

[4]  T. Litman Evaluating Transportation Land Use Impacts , 2004 .

[5]  R. Ewing,et al.  MEASURING SPRAWL AND ITS IMPACT , 2002 .

[6]  L. Dijkstra,et al.  Promoting safe walking and cycling to improve public health: lessons from The Netherlands and Germany. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[7]  R. Stott,et al.  The World Bank , 2008, Annals of tropical medicine and parasitology.

[8]  J. March FEDERAL HIGHWAY COST ALLOCATION STUDY , 1998 .

[9]  Charles C. Bohl Place Making: Developing Town Centers, Main Streets, and Urban Villages , 2002 .

[10]  R. Tolley Sustainable transport : planning for walking and cycling in urban environments , 2003 .

[11]  David J. Forkenbrock,et al.  GUIDEBOOK FOR ASSESSING THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS , 2001 .

[12]  P Reitveld NON-MOTORISED MODES IN TRANSPORT SYSTEMS: A MULTIMODAL CHAIN PERSPECTIVE FOR THE NETHERLANDS , 2000 .

[13]  John Pucher,et al.  Making Walking and Cycling Safer: Lessons from Europe , 2000 .

[14]  D. Levinson,et al.  The Value of Trail Access on Home Purchases , 2005 .

[15]  M. Pratt,et al.  Physical activity and health , 1996, BMJ.

[16]  Todd Litman,et al.  MEASURING TRANSPORTATION: TRAFFIC, MOBILITY, AND ACCESSIBILITY , 2003 .

[17]  G Clark,et al.  Mean streets. , 1998, Nursing times.

[18]  K Saelensminde,et al.  WALKING AND CYCLING TRACK NETWORKS IN NORWEGIAN CITIES. COST-BENEFIT ANALYSES INCLUDING HEALTH EFFECTS AND EXTERNAL COSTS OF ROAD TRAFFIC , 2002 .

[19]  W. Wasike,et al.  Cost-benefit analysis and the environment , 1995 .

[20]  Todd Litman,et al.  Integrating Public Health Objectives in Transportation Decision-Making , 2003, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[21]  Cy Ulberg,et al.  AT ROAD'S END: TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE CHOICES FOR COMMUNITIES. SURFACE TRANSPORTATION POLICY PROJECT , 1995 .

[22]  Chris S. Kochtitzky,et al.  Creating a healthy environment: the impact of the built environment on public health , 2000 .

[23]  D. Gordon Bagby The Effects of Traffic Flow on Residential Property Values , 1980 .

[24]  Marie Demers Walk for Your Life! Restoring Neighborhood Walkways to Enhance Community Life, Improve Street Safety and Reduce Obesity , 2005 .

[25]  Marlon G. Boarnet,et al.  Do Highways Matter? Evidence and Policy Implications of Highways' Influence on Metropolitan Development , 2000 .

[26]  Todd Litman Evaluating Transportation Choice , 2001 .

[27]  Mark A. Delucchi,et al.  The Social Cost of the Health Effects of Motor-Vehicle Air Pollution , 1996 .

[28]  Lawrence D. Frank,et al.  Active transportation and physical activity: opportunities for collaboration on transportation and public health research , 2004 .

[29]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  Non-motorised modes in transport systems: a multimodal chain perspective for The Netherlands , 2000 .

[30]  Rachel Goodman 6 – The decline of everyday walking in the UK: explanations and policy implications , 2003 .

[31]  C. Arnold,et al.  IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE: THE EMERGENCE OF A KEY ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR , 1996 .