Integrating Machine Learning and Optimization Methods for Imaging of Patients with Prostate Cancer

We combine predictive modeling techniques from machine learning and optimization methods to design coordinated imaging protocols for detection of metastatic cancer. Our approach considers different combinations of imaging tests to reduce imaging while also ensuring that the average risk of missing a metastatic cancer in the population does not exceed a desirable threshold. To account for the imperfect calibration of probability estimates obtained from predictive models, we formulate the decision problem of determining the optimal assignment of patients to imaging protocols as a robust mixed-integer program. Furthermore, we propose fast, easy-to-understand and clinically motivated approximation algorithms that can mitigate the effects of statistical error in predictions. We illustrate the practical performance of the proposed approximation algorithms and optimization models based on medical data collected by a large state-wide prostate cancer collaborative. The work presented in this article will help lay the groundwork to improve medical decision making by integrating machine learning and optimization in other disease areas.

[1]  Shiguang R. Xie,et al.  Optimal selection of screening assays for infectious agents in donated blood , 2011 .

[2]  A. D'Amico,et al.  NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer. , 2010, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[3]  Peter L Choyke,et al.  Imaging prostate cancer: a multidisciplinary perspective. , 2007, Radiology.

[4]  Arkadi Nemirovski,et al.  Selected topics in robust convex optimization , 2007, Math. Program..

[5]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[6]  Prabhakant Sinha,et al.  The Multiple-Choice Knapsack Problem , 1979, Oper. Res..

[7]  Douglas R. Bish,et al.  Robust Postdonation Blood Screening Under Prevalence Rate Uncertainty , 2017, Oper. Res..

[8]  Christine M. Barnett,et al.  Data Analytics for Optimal Detection of Metastatic Prostate Cancer , 2016 .

[9]  Ryan S. Xie,et al.  Going beyond “same-for-all” testing of infectious agents in donated blood , 2014 .

[10]  Eugene C Lin,et al.  Radiation risk from medical imaging. , 2010, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[11]  J. Nocedal,et al.  A Limited Memory Algorithm for Bound Constrained Optimization , 1995, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[12]  David C. Miller,et al.  Toward better use of bone scans among men with early-stage prostate cancer. , 2014, Urology.

[13]  C. Abbou,et al.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. , 2009, European urology.

[14]  Douglas R. Bish,et al.  Safety and waste considerations in donated blood screening , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Constantine Caramanis,et al.  Theory and Applications of Robust Optimization , 2010, SIAM Rev..

[16]  Brian T. Denton,et al.  Clinical predictors and recommendations for staging computed tomography scan among men with prostate cancer. , 2014, Urology.

[17]  Laurent El Ghaoui,et al.  Robust Optimization , 2021, ICORES.

[18]  K. Prasad,et al.  Health Risks of Low Dose Ionizing Radiation in Humans: A Review , 2004, Experimental biology and medicine.

[19]  Peter H Gann,et al.  Prostate specific antigen best practice statement: 2009 update. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[20]  Melvyn Sim,et al.  Robust discrete optimization and network flows , 2003, Math. Program..