Low-cost audience polling using computer vision

Electronic response systems known as "clickers" have demonstrated educational benefits in well-resourced classrooms, but remain out-of-reach for most schools due to their prohibitive cost. We propose a new, low-cost technique that utilizes computer vision for real-time polling of a classroom. Our approach allows teachers to ask a multiple-choice question. Students respond by holding up a qCard: a sheet of paper that contains a printed code, similar to a QR code, encoding their student IDs. Students indicate their answers (A, B, C or D) by holding the card in one of four orientations. Using a laptop and an off-the-shelf webcam, our software automatically recognizes and aggregates the students' responses and displays them to the teacher. We built this system and performed initial trials in secondary schools in Bangalore, India. In a 25-student classroom, our system offers 99.8% recognition accuracy, captures 97% of responses within 10 seconds, and costs 15 times less than existing electronic solutions.

[1]  Robin H. Kay,et al.  Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[2]  Heiko Drewes,et al.  Design of an audience voting system for the Olympic games , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[3]  W. Crozier,et al.  The influence of shyness on children's test performance. , 2003, The British journal of educational psychology.

[4]  Kirstie Hawkey,et al.  From cookies to puppies to athletes: designing a visual audience voting system , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[5]  Jill A. Marshall,et al.  Classroom Response Systems: A Review of the Literature , 2006 .

[6]  Karl Forsberg,et al.  PHOTOVOTE: Olympic judging system , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[7]  Loretta L. Jones,et al.  A Review of Literature Reports of Clickers Applicable to College Chemistry Classrooms , 2008 .

[8]  Mayank Sharma,et al.  An investigation of purpose built netbooks for primary school education , 2009, IDC.

[9]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  Technology as small group face-to-face Collaborative Scaffolding , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[10]  J. C. De Gagne,et al.  The impact of clickers in nursing education: a review of literature. , 2011, Nurse education today.

[11]  Jane E Caldwell,et al.  Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[12]  Jeffrey R. Stowell,et al.  Using Student Response Systems (“Clickers”) to Combat Conformity and Shyness , 2010 .

[13]  Geoff Wyvill,et al.  BallBouncer : interactive games for theater audiences , 2009 .

[14]  Steven M. Seitz,et al.  Techniques for interactive audience participation , 2002, Proceedings. Fourth IEEE International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces.

[15]  Chee-Kit Looi,et al.  Collaborative activities enabled by GroupScribbles (GS): An exploratory study of learning effectiveness , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[16]  Parastoo Sadeghi,et al.  Bar Code Recognition in Highly Distorted and Low Resolution Images , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - ICASSP '07.