Ultrasonic bubbles in medicine: influence of the shell.

Ultrasound contrast agents consist of microscopically small bubbles encapsulated by an elastic shell. These microbubbles oscillate upon ultrasound insonification, and demonstrate highly nonlinear behavior, ameliorating their detectability. (Potential) medical applications involving the ultrasonic disruption of contrast agent microbubble shells include release-burst imaging, localized drug delivery, and noninvasive blood pressure measurement. To develop and enhance these techniques, predicting the cracking behavior of ultrasound-insonified encapsulated microbubbles has been of importance. In this paper, we explore microbubble behavior in an ultrasound field, with special attention to the influence of the bubble shell. A bubble in a sound field can be considered a forced damped harmonic oscillator. For encapsulated microbubbles, the presence of a shell has to be taken into account. In models, an extra damping parameter and a shell stiffness parameter have been included, assuming that Hooke's Law holds for the bubble shell. At high acoustic amplitudes, disruptive phenomena have been observed, such as microbubble fragmentation and ultrasonic cracking. We analyzed the occurrence of ultrasound contrast agent fragmentation, by simulating the oscillating behavior of encapsulated microbubbles with various sizes in a harmonic acoustic field. Fragmentation occurs exclusively during the collapse phase and occurs if the kinetic energy of the collapsing microbubble is greater than the instantaneous bubble surface energy, provided that surface instabilities have grown big enough to allow for break-up. From our simulations it follows that the Blake critical radius is not a good approximation for a fragmentation threshold. We demonstrated how the phase angle differences between a damped radially oscillating bubble and an incident sound field depend on shell parameters.

[1]  G. Schmitz Ultrasound in Medical Diagnosis , 2002 .

[2]  Hairong Zheng,et al.  Theoretical predictions of harmonic generation from submicron ultrasound contrast agents for nonlinear biomedical ultrasound imaging , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Eitan Kimmel,et al.  Stability of an encapsulated bubble shell. , 2006, Ultrasonics.

[4]  阿部 博之,et al.  Data book on mechanical properties of living cells, tissues, and organs , 1996 .

[5]  P. Dayton,et al.  Influence of lipid shell physicochemical properties on ultrasound-induced microbubble destruction , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[6]  Charles T. Lancée,et al.  Higher harmonics of vibrating gas-filled microspheres. Part one: simulations , 1994 .

[7]  N. de Jong,et al.  A new ultrasound contrast imaging approach based on the combination of multiple imaging pulses and a separate release burst , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[8]  Georg Schmitz,et al.  Bubble dynamics involved in ultrasonic imaging , 2006, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[9]  MECHANISMS OF MEMBRANE RUPTURE : FROM CRACKS TO PORES , 1997 .

[10]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Basic Acoustic Properties of Microbubbles , 2002, Echocardiography.

[11]  H. Medwin,et al.  Counting bubbles acoustically: a review , 1977 .

[12]  Paul A. Dayton,et al.  Optical observation of lipid- and polymer-shelled ultrasound microbubble contrast agents , 2004 .

[13]  Dhiman Chatterjee,et al.  Characterization of ultrasound contrast microbubbles using in vitro experiments and viscous and viscoelastic interface models for encapsulation. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  H. Katus,et al.  Therapeutic Use of Ultrasound Targeted Microbubble Destruction: A Review of Non-Cardiac Applications , 2006, Ultraschall in der Medizin.

[15]  W. McDicken,et al.  Nanointerrogation of ultrasonic contrast agent microbubbles using atomic force microscopy. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[16]  E. Stride,et al.  Theoretical and experimental investigation of the behaviour of ultrasound contrast agent particles in whole blood. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[17]  N de Jong,et al.  Acoustic modeling of shell-encapsulated gas bubbles. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[18]  S. L. Bridal,et al.  Ultrasonic contrast agent shell rupture detected by inertial cavitation and rebound signals , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[19]  Edward Roy Pike,et al.  Scattering: Scattering and Inverse Scattering in Pure and Applied Science , 2002 .

[20]  Detlef Lohse,et al.  A model for large amplitude oscillations of coated bubbles accounting for buckling and rupture , 2005 .

[21]  N de Jong,et al.  Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: theoretical considerations and some measurements. , 1992, Ultrasonics.

[22]  C. Brennen Cavitation and Bubble Dynamics , 1995 .

[23]  J. Riess,et al.  Injectable microbubbles as contrast agents for diagnostic ultrasound imaging: the key role of perfluorochemicals. , 2003, Angewandte Chemie.

[24]  P. Dayton,et al.  Threshold of fragmentation for ultrasonic contrast agents. , 2001, Journal of biomedical optics.

[25]  Christopher E. Brennen,et al.  Fission of collapsing cavitation bubbles , 2002, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[26]  Charles C. Church,et al.  The effects of an elastic solid surface layer on the radial pulsations of gas bubbles , 1995 .

[27]  N. Saffari,et al.  Investigating the significance of multiple scattering in ultrasound contrast agent particle populations , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[28]  P. Dayton,et al.  Spatio-temporal dynamics of an encapsulated gas bubble in an ultrasound field. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  J. Gorce,et al.  Influence of Bubble Size Distribution on the Echogenicity of Ultrasound Contrast Agents: A Study of SonoVue™ , 2000, Investigative radiology.

[30]  Katherine W Ferrara,et al.  Dynamics of therapeutic ultrasound contrast agents. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[31]  Hairong Zheng,et al.  Predicting backscatter characteristics from micron- and submicron-scale ultrasound contrast agents using a size-integration technique , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[32]  M. Postema,et al.  Ultrasonic fragmentation of microbubbles: a theoretical approach of the flash in flash-echo , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[33]  Raffi Bekeredjian,et al.  Use of ultrasound contrast agents for gene or drug delivery in cardiovascular medicine. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[34]  P. Dayton,et al.  Experimental and theoretical evaluation of microbubble behavior: effect of transmitted phase and bubble size , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[35]  N. Bom,et al.  Noninvasive measurement of the hydrostatic pressure in a fluid-filled cavity based on the disappearance time of micrometer-sized free gas bubbles. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.