Validation of the Questionnaire of Quality Assessment of Online Courses adapted to MOOC

Massive Online Open Courses (MOOC) constitute a virtual training modality which is already present at today’s educational scenario, and which reflects a specific conception of e-learning. Universities are integrating this type of training as part of their formative offer or, at least, are debating whether to integrate it or not. In the light of the above, it becomes necessary to gauge what the characteristics of these courses should be so that they can configure a high-quality virtual training format. These are considered to be necessary instruments when it comes to guaranteeing the quality of MOOC from different perspectives, the pedagogical one in this case –since the success and consolidation of this e-learning format will depend thereon. The aim sought with the present study was therefore to validate a questionnaire for the pedagogical evaluation of MOOC through an adaptation of the cuestionario de evaluacion de cursos virtuales [questionnaire for the evaluation of virtual courses] (Arias, 2007). The validity and reliability of the said test was checked using a principal components factor analysis with Varimax rotation. The conclusion drawn is that it would suffice to introduce adaptations on the list of dimensions proposed in this questionnaire that take into account the specificities of MOOC, since the latter cannot be exclusively analyzed from the general perspective of e-learning –as it was prior to MOOC. Thus, the dimensions which serve as the basis for that questionnaire are: 1) quality of communication and multimedia elements in online massive courses; 2) curricular consistency in such courses as well as their degree of adaptation to the user; and 3) quality of their didactic planning.

[1]  A. K. M. Najmul Islam,et al.  Investigating e-learning system usage outcomes in the university context , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[2]  Kate Donnelly,et al.  An Avalanche Is Coming. Higher Education and the Revolution Ahead , 2013 .

[3]  Timothy Read,et al.  Toward a Quality Model for UNED MOOCs , 2014 .

[4]  R. B. Alzina Metodología de la investigación educativa , 2004 .

[5]  Beatriz Olivia Camarena Gómez,et al.  RETOS Y POSIBILIDADES DE LOS CURSOS EN LÍNEA A PARTIR DE UNA EXPERIENCIA CONCRETA. , 2014 .

[6]  J. Daniel,et al.  Making Sense of MOOCs : Musings in a Maze of Myth , Paradox and Possibility Author : , 2013 .

[7]  Ideleichy Lombillo Rivero,et al.  Didactics of the use of ICT and traditional teaching aids in municipal higher education institutions , 2012 .

[8]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Meeting the Challenge of Disruptive Change , 2000 .

[9]  M.ª Paz Prendes Espinosa,et al.  Arquímedes y la tecnología educativa : un análisis crítico en torno a los MOOC , 2014 .

[10]  Gráinne Conole Los MOOCs como tecnologías disruptivas: estrategias para mejorar la experiencia de aprendizaje y la calidad de los MOOCs , 2013 .

[11]  Jonathan Rosewell,et al.  The OpenupEd quality label: benchmarks for MOOCs , 2014 .

[12]  George Siemens,et al.  The MOOC model for digital practice , 2010 .

[13]  José Luis Serrano Sánchez,et al.  Practical Experiences for the Development of Educational Systems in the Semantic Web. , 2013 .

[14]  Diane J Skiba Disruption in higher education: massively open online courses (MOOCs). , 2012, Nursing education perspectives.

[15]  Cristóbal Suárez Guerrero,et al.  Evaluación de la calidad pedagógica de los MOOC , 2014 .

[16]  Ulrik Schroeder,et al.  MOOCs - A Review of the State-of-the-Art , 2014, CSEDU.

[17]  Leoncio Vega Gil Global politics and education systems: towards education markets? , 2013 .

[18]  Roy Williams,et al.  The Ideals and Reality of Participating in a MOOC , 2010, Proceedings of the International Conference on Networked Learning.

[19]  Albert Sangrà,et al.  MOOC Design Principles. A Pedagogical Approach from the Learner"s Perspective , 2013 .

[20]  Daniel Torres Mancera,et al.  LOS MOOCS Y SU PAPEL EN LA CREACIÓN DE COMUNIDADES DE APRENDIZAJE Y PARTICIPACIÓN , 2014 .

[21]  Miguel Zapata-Ros MOOCs, una visión crítica y una alternativa complementaria: La individualización del aprendizaje y de la ayuda pedagógica , 2015 .

[22]  George Siemens,et al.  Where is research on massive open online courses headed? A data analysis of the MOOC research initiative , 2014 .

[23]  Carlos G. Giorgetti,et al.  Design of a specific quality assessment model for distance education , 2013, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education.

[24]  José Antonio Ortega Carrillo,et al.  Indicadores de calidad en las plataformas de formación virtual: Una aproximación sistemática , 2003 .

[25]  David George Glance,et al.  The pedagogical foundations of massive open online courses , 2013, First Monday.

[26]  Santiago Mengual Andrés,et al.  Impacto de la Sociedad del Conocimiento en la Universidad y en la Comunicación Científica , 2014 .

[27]  Rebecca J. Hogue,et al.  Using mLearning and MOOCs to understand chaos, emergence, and complexity in education , 2011 .

[28]  Ramón Capdevilla Pagès,et al.  Los Cursos Online Masivos y Abiertos: ¿oportunidad o amenaza para las universidades iberoamericanas? , 2014 .

[29]  E. Edgar,et al.  La investigación educativa , 2013 .

[30]  Tony Bates,et al.  La gestión de la tecnología en la Educación Superior: estrategias para transformar la enseñanza y el aprendizaje , 2012 .

[31]  Helene Fournier,et al.  A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings? Participant support on massive open online courses , 2011 .

[32]  Esteban Vázquez Cano,et al.  La expansión del conocimiento en abierto: los MOOC , 2015, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education.