Rods-on-string idealization captures semiflexible filament dynamics.

We present an approach to modeling the two-dimensional Brownian dynamics of semiflexible filaments in the worm-model description as uniform, isotropic, and continuously flexible. Experimental observations increasingly show that the mechanical behavior of semiflexible filament networks departs from conventional knowledge. A force-balance-based dynamic simulation of the filament networks has multiple advantages as an approach to understanding their anomalous mechanics. However, a major disadvantage is the difficulty of capturing filament hydrodynamics and bending mechanics in a computationally efficient and physically consistent manner. To that end, we propose a strategy for modeling semiflexible filaments which involves idealizing a semiflexible filament as a contiguous string of flexible rods, and considering the Brownian forces on it as Einsteinian-like point normal and tangential forces. By idealizing the filament as a string of rods, we avoid the complex hydrodynamic treatment involved in beads-on-string idealizations, and implement large-deflection beam mechanics and filament inextensibility in a natural manner, while reducing the computational size of the problem. By considering the Brownian forces as point normal and tangential forces, we decompose the Brownian forces on straight and curved segments into a combination of classical resultant forces and couples whose distribution is shown to be governed by the rod diffusion coefficients. The decomposition allows solution of the Euler beam equations to second-order continuity between segments and fifth-order continuity within segments. We show that the approach is physically consistent by capturing multiple Brownian phenomena ranging from the rigid to the semiflexible limit: the translational and rotational diffusion of rigid rods; the thermal fluctuation of semirigid cantilever filaments; and the shape, bending, and time relaxation of freely diffusing, semiflexible actin filaments.

[1]  F. Virginia Rohde Large deflections of a cantilever beam with uniformly distributed load , 1953 .

[2]  Kjell Mattiasson,et al.  Numerical results from large deflection beam and frame problems analysed by means of elliptic integrals , 1981 .

[3]  J. Howard,et al.  Flexural rigidity of microtubules and actin filaments measured from thermal fluctuations in shape , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[4]  K. E. Bisshopp,et al.  Large deflection of cantilever beams , 1945 .

[5]  D. ben-Avraham,et al.  Dynamic and elastic properties of F-actin: a normal-modes analysis. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[6]  B. Zimm,et al.  Monte Carlo approach to the analysis of the rotational diffusion of wormlike chains , 1981 .

[7]  J. Käs,et al.  Direct Measurement of the Wave-Vector-Dependent Bending Stiffness of Freely Flickering Actin Filaments , 1993 .

[8]  D. Morse,et al.  Brownian dynamics algorithm for bead-rod semiflexible chain with anisotropic friction. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[9]  R Ezzell,et al.  F-actin, a model polymer for semiflexible chains in dilute, semidilute, and liquid crystalline solutions. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[10]  E. M. Lifshitz,et al.  Theory of Elasticity: Vol. 7 of Course of Theoretical Physics , 1960 .

[11]  D. Ermak,et al.  Brownian dynamics with hydrodynamic interactions , 1978 .

[12]  Sebastian Rammensee,et al.  Negative normal stress in semiflexible biopolymer gels. , 2007, Nature materials.

[13]  B. Carrasco,et al.  Improved hydrodynamic interaction in macromolecular bead models , 1999 .

[14]  F. C. MacKintosh,et al.  Determining Microscopic Viscoelasticity in Flexible and Semiflexible Polymer Networks from Thermal Fluctuations , 1997 .

[15]  Daniel A. Fletcher,et al.  Reversible stress softening of actin networks , 2007, Nature.

[16]  O. Kratky,et al.  Röntgenuntersuchung gelöster Fadenmoleküle , 1949 .

[17]  P. Janmey,et al.  Nonlinear elasticity in biological gels , 2004, Nature.

[18]  J. Marko,et al.  The bending rigidity of mitotic chromosomes. , 2002, Molecular biology of the cell.

[19]  Erwin Frey,et al.  Brownian motion: a paradigm of soft matter and biological physics , 2005, Annalen der Physik.

[20]  David A Weitz,et al.  Bending dynamics of fluctuating biopolymers probed by automated high-resolution filament tracking. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[21]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[22]  Jianpeng Ma New advances in normal mode analysis of supermolecular complexes and applications to structural refinement. , 2004, Current protein & peptide science.

[23]  C. Tanford Macromolecules , 1994, Nature.

[24]  Radial Distribution Function of Semiflexible Polymers. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[25]  R. Waugh,et al.  Passive mechanical behavior of human neutrophils: effects of colchicine and paclitaxel. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[26]  J. García de la Torre,et al.  Hydrodynamic properties of rigid particles: comparison of different modeling and computational procedures. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[27]  Jianpeng Ma,et al.  The role of shape in determining molecular motions. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[28]  C. Neipp,et al.  Large and small deflections of a cantilever beam , 2002 .

[29]  Álvaro Ortega,et al.  Hydrodynamic properties of rodlike and disklike particles in dilute solution , 2003 .

[30]  Ahu Demiroz Prediction of Large Deformation Behavior of Fabric Using Galerkin Finite Element Method , 2005 .

[31]  C. Neipp,et al.  Numerical and Experimental Analysis of Large Deflections of Cantilever Beams Under a Combined Load , 2005 .

[32]  Alex Mogilner,et al.  Mechanics of Motor Proteins and the Cytoskeleton , 2002 .

[33]  A. Yodh,et al.  Local and global deformations in a strain-stiffening fibrin gel , 2007 .