Provider attitudes toward a rural telepathology program.

OBJECTIVE To assess the attitudes of referring and consulting pathologists toward a recently initiated live video telepathology network in rural Vermont. METHODS A semistructured interview was conducted with each referring pathologist before implementation of the telepathology program and again 9 months later. The interview consisted of questions concerning reasons for seeking a consultation in general and attitudes toward telepathology specifically. A questionnaire with Likert-type response categories was administered at the 9-month timepoint to the referring (N = 4) and consulting (N = 10) pathologists. This questionnaire contained items regarding communication, cost, education, quality, and timeliness aspects of telepathology. In addition, a brief mail survey was sent to attending physicians who utilized pathology services at the rural hospitals. RESULTS The referring pathologists found the timeliness of consults using telemedicine to be a significant advantage. They also cited educational benefits both from attending telepathology conferences and from the interactive nature of the consultations. Two areas of concern were difficulties in minimizing scheduling inconveniences and uncertainty about the financial sustainability of the network. Overall, the telepathology system was well received by the consulting pathologists. Recurrent technical difficulties with the system were mentioned as a problem area. CONCLUSION The pathologists participating in the Vermont telepathology network have reported benefiting from using this technology. Whether these benefits will outweight the costs of using telepathology for routine consultations remains to be determined.

[1]  D S Puskin,et al.  Telecommunications in Rural America , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[2]  M Fuchs,et al.  Provider Attitudes toward STARPAHC: A Telemedicine Project on the Papago Reservation , 1979, Medical care.

[3]  J. Coleman,et al.  Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. , 1967 .

[4]  T J Eide,et al.  Current status of telepathology , 1994, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.

[5]  M Oberholzer,et al.  Telepathology with an integrated services digital network--a new tool for image transfer in surgical pathology: a preliminary report. , 1993, Human pathology.

[6]  B. Crouse,et al.  Rural Minnesota family physicians' attitudes toward telemedicine. , 1995, Minnesota medicine.

[7]  J. Grigsby,et al.  Analytic framework for evaluation of telemedicine. , 1995, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[8]  J Preston,et al.  Using telemedicine to improve health care in distant areas. , 1992, Hospital & community psychiatry.

[9]  H Bastien,et al.  Telepathology: a new tool of pathology? Presentation of a French national network. , 1992, Zentralblatt fur Pathologie.

[10]  The benefits of telephone-access medical consultation. , 1993, The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association.

[11]  S. Olsson,et al.  A national telepathology trial in Sweden feasibility and assessment. , 1995, Archives d'anatomie et de cytologie pathologiques.

[12]  K. Dohi,et al.  Telepathology is available for transplantation-pathology: experience in Japan using an integrated, low-cost, and high-quality system. , 1994, Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc.

[13]  R S Weinstein,et al.  Telepathology and the networking of pathology diagnostic services. , 1987, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[14]  R S Weinstein,et al.  Prospects for telepathology. , 1986, Human pathology.

[15]  A. Bhattacharyya,et al.  Case triage model for the practice of telepathology. , 1995, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.