Make, buy, organize: The interplay between research, external knowledge, and firm structure†

We bridge current streams of innovation research to explore the interplay between R&D, external knowledge, and organizational structure�three elements of a firm's innovation strategy, which we argue should logically be studied together. Using within-firm patent assignment patterns, we develop a novel measure of structure for a large sample of American firms. We find that centralized firms invest more in research, and patent more per R&D dollar, than decentralized firms. Both types access technology via mergers and acquisitions, but their acquisitions differ in terms of frequency, size, and integration. Consistent with our framework, their sources of value creation differ: while centralized firms derive more value from internal R&D, decentralized firms rely more on external knowledge. We discuss how these findings should stimulate more integrative work on theories of innovation. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  R. Duane Ireland,et al.  MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS AND MANAGERIAL COMMITMENT TO INNOVATION IN M-FORM FIRMS , 1990 .

[2]  A. Arora,et al.  The changing technology of technological change: general and abstract knowledge and the division of , 1994 .

[3]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Balancing Search and Stability: Interdependencies Among Elements of Organizational Design , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[4]  Z. Griliches.  Market Value, R&D, and Patents , 1981 .

[5]  W. Mitchell,et al.  Resource redeployment following horizontal acquisitions in Europe and North America, 1988-1992 , 1998 .

[6]  B. Silverman,et al.  R&D, ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE, AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF CORPORATE TECHNOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE , 2004 .

[7]  Raffaele Oriani,et al.  The Market Valuation of Knowledge Assets in US and European Firms , 2006 .

[8]  Christina Fang,et al.  Balancing Exploration and Exploitation through Structural Design: The Isolation of Subgroups and Organization Learning , 2008 .

[9]  Bruce Kogut,et al.  Country capabilities and the permeability of borders , 1991 .

[10]  David A. Nadler,et al.  Competing By Design , 1997 .

[11]  G. Dosi.  Innovation, organization and economic dynamics : selected essays , 2000 .

[12]  Samina Karim,et al.  Structural Knowledge: How Executive Experience with Structural Composition Affects Intrafirm Mobility and Unit Reconfiguration , 2012 .

[13]  David A. Hounshell,et al.  Science and Corporate Strategy: Du Pont R&D , 1989 .

[14]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technical Change and Economic Theory , 1989 .

[15]  Jasjit Singh.  Distributed R&D, Cross-Regional Knowledge Integration and Quality of Innovative Output , 2006 .

[16]  R. Katz,et al.  Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups , 1982 .

[17]  A. Arora,et al.  Specialized technology suppliers, international spillovers and investment: evidence from the chemical industry , 2001 .

[18]  Sharon Belenzon,et al.  Innovation in Business Groups , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[19]  W. Ocasio,et al.  Architecture, Attention, and Adaptation in the Multibusiness Firm: General Electric from 1951 to 2001 , 2012 .

[20]  Josh Lerner,et al.  Innovation and Incentives: Evidence from Corporate R&D , 2006, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[21]  Milton Harris,et al.  Organization Design , 2000, Manag. Sci..

[22]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Organizing for Innovation: Managing the Coordination-Autonomy Dilemma in Technology Acquisitions , 2006 .

[23]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Deliberate learning in corporate acquisitions: post‐acquisition strategies and integration capability in U.S. bank mergers , 2004 .

[24]  Alfonso Gambardella,et al.  Science and innovation: Science and innovation in pharmaceutical research , 1995 .

[25]  S. Karim.  Modularity in Organizational Structure: The Reconfiguration of Internally Developed and Acquired Business Units , 2006 .

[26]  Kevin J. Murphy,et al.  Relational Contracts and the Theory of the Firm , 1997 .

[27]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. , 1985 .

[28]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Perspective - Neo-Carnegie: The Carnegie School's Past, Present, and Reconstructing for the Future , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[29]  C. Bloch.  THE MARKET VALUATION OF KNOWLEDGE ASSETS , 2008 .

[30]  David A. Hounshell,et al.  Science and corporate strategy , 1988 .

[31]  D. Hambrick.  THE FIELD OF MANAGEMENT'S DEVOTION TO THEORY: TOO MUCH OF A GOOD THING? , 2007 .

[32]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[33]  Will Mitchell,et al.  Innovating Through Acquisition and Internal Development: A Quarter-Century of Boundary Evolution at Johnson & Johnson , 2004 .

[34]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  The Strategy Research Initiative: Recognizing and encouraging high-quality research in strategy , 2010 .

[35]  Julie Wulf.  The Flattened Firm: Not as Advertised , 2012 .

[36]  R. Katila,et al.  Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .

[37]  L. Fleming.  Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search Lee Fleming , 2001 .

[38]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Inter‐temporal economies of scope, organizational modularity, and the dynamics of diversification , 2004 .

[39]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation , 1993 .

[40]  Michael A. Hitt,et al.  Managerial Incentives and Investment in R&D in Large Multiproduct Firms , 1993 .

[41]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Location, Decentralization, and Knowledge Sources for Innovation , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[42]  Nicolaj Siggelkow.  Firms as Systems of Interdependent Choices , 2011 .

[43]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[44]  N. Rosenberg.  Technological Interdependence in the American Economy , 2023 .

[45]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[46]  S. Winter,et al.  Understanding corporate coherence: Theory and evidence , 1994 .

[47]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Measuring competence?: exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research , 1994 .

[48]  Corporate Restructuring and the Creation of the Innovation Milieu: The case of a second-tier high technology region , 2003 .

[49]  Giovanni Gavetti,et al.  Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging , 2000 .

[50]  David A. Hounshell,et al.  Science and corporate strategy. Du pont R&D, 1902–1980 , 2004, Cancer Causes & Control.

[51]  G. Pisano.  The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis , 1990 .

[52]  Richard A. Bettis,et al.  The search for asterisks: Compromised statistical tests and flawed theories , 2012 .

[53]  P. Puranam,et al.  What They Know vs. What They Do: How Acquirers Leverage Technology Acquisitions , 2007 .

[54]  W. Mitchell,et al.  Path-dependent and path-breaking change: reconfiguring business resources following acquisitions in the U.S. medical sector, 1978–1995 , 2000 .

[55]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[56]  A. Jaffe.  Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .