Quantifying geographic accessibility to improve cost-effectiveness of entomological monitoring

Background Vector-borne diseases are important causes of mortality and morbidity in humans and livestock, particularly for poorer communities and countries in the tropics. Large-scale programs against these diseases, for example malaria, dengue and African trypanosomiasis, include vector control, and assessing the impact of this intervention requires frequent and extensive monitoring of disease vector abundance. Such monitoring can be expensive, especially in the later stages of a successful program where numbers of vectors and cases are low. Methodology/Principal Findings We developed a system that allows the identification of monitoring sites where pre-intervention densities of vectors are predicted to be high, and travel cost to sites is low, highlighting the most cost-effective locations for longitudinal monitoring. Using remotely sensed imagery and an image classification algorithm, we mapped landscape resistance associated with on- and off-road travel for every gridded location (3m and 0.5m grid cells) within Koboko district, Uganda. We combine the accessibility surface with pre-existing estimates of tsetse abundance and propose a stratified sampling approach to determine cost-effective locations for longitudinal data collection. Our modelled predictions were validated against empirical measurements of travel-time and existing maps of road networks. We applied this approach in northern Uganda where a large-scale vector control program is being implemented to control human African trypanosomiasis, a neglected tropical disease (NTD) caused by trypanosomes transmitted by tsetse flies. Our accessibility surfaces indicate a high performance when compared to empirical data, with remote sensing identifying a further ~70% of roads than existing networks. Conclusions/Significance By integrating such estimates with predictions of tsetse abundance, we propose a methodology to determine the optimal placement of sentinel monitoring sites for evaluating control programme efficacy, moving from a nuanced, ad-hoc approach incorporating intuition, knowledge of vector ecology and local knowledge of geographic accessibility, to a reproducible, quantifiable one. Author Summary Assessing the impact of vector control programmes requires longitudinal measurements of the abundance of insect vectors within intervention areas. Such monitoring can be expensive, especially in the later stages of a successful program where numbers of vectors and cases of disease are low. Cost-effective monitoring involves a prior selection of monitoring sites that are easy to reach and produce rich information on vector abundance. Here, we used image classification and cost-distance algorithms to produce estimates of accessibility within Koboko district, Uganda, where vector control is contributing to the elimination of sleeping sickness, a neglected tropical disease (NTD). We combine an accessibility surface with pre-existing estimates of tsetse abundance and propose a stratified sampling approach to determine locations which are associated with low cost (lowest travel time) and potential for longitudinal data collection (high pre-intervention abundance). Our method could be adapted for use in the planning and monitoring of tsetse- and other vector-control programmes. By providing methods to ensure that vector control programmes operate at maximum cost-effectiveness, we can ensure that the limited funding associated with some of these NTDs has the largest impact.

[1]  M. Horan,et al.  Ageing, defence mechanisms and the immune system. , 1997, Age and ageing.

[2]  William J. Cook,et al.  Chained Lin-Kernighan for Large Traveling Salesman Problems , 2003, INFORMS Journal on Computing.

[3]  Martin J. Donnelly,et al.  Improved spatial ecological sampling using open data and standardization: an example from malaria mosquito surveillance , 2019, Journal of the Royal Society Interface.

[4]  David L Smith,et al.  The Risk of a Mosquito-Borne Infectionin a Heterogeneous Environment , 2004, PLoS biology.

[5]  Jacob van Etten,et al.  R package gdistance: distances and routes on geographical grids (version 1.1-4) , 2012 .

[6]  N. Ferguson Challenges and opportunities in controlling mosquito-borne infections , 2018, Nature.

[7]  J. Riverson,et al.  Rural Roads in Sub-Saharan Africa: Lessons from World Bank Experience , 1991 .

[8]  E. Fèvre,et al.  Sleeping sickness in Uganda: a thin line between two fatal diseases , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  R. Myneni,et al.  The interpretation of spectral vegetation indexes , 1995 .

[10]  A. Tatem,et al.  Geospatial mapping of access to timely essential surgery in sub-Saharan Africa , 2018, BMJ Global Health.

[11]  J. McDermott,et al.  Sleeping sickness in Uganda: revisiting current and historical distributions. , 2006, African health sciences.

[12]  Richard W. Bohannon Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20-79 years: reference values and determinants. , 1997, Age and ageing.

[13]  S. Torr,et al.  Costs Of Using “Tiny Targets” to Control Glossina fuscipes fuscipes, a Vector of Gambiense Sleeping Sickness in Arua District of Uganda , 2015, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[14]  F. Agbenyo,et al.  Accessibility mapping of health facilities in rural Ghana , 2017 .

[15]  M. Grillet,et al.  Venezuela and its rising vector-borne neglected diseases , 2017, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[16]  S. Torr,et al.  Tsetse Control and Gambian Sleeping Sickness; Implications for Control Strategy , 2015, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[17]  G. Cecchi,et al.  Monitoring the elimination of human African trypanosomiasis: Update to 2014 , 2017, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[18]  Susan C. Welburn,et al.  Cost analysis of options for management of African Animal Trypanosomiasis using interventions targeted at cattle in Tororo District; south-eastern Uganda , 2015, Parasites & Vectors.

[19]  P. Sellers Canopy reflectance, photosynthesis and transpiration , 1985 .

[20]  T. V. Van Boeckel,et al.  Monitoring the impact of decentralised chronic care services on patient travel time in rural Africa - methods and results in Northern Malawi , 2012, International Journal of Health Geographics.

[21]  M. Eubanks,et al.  Hosts or habitats: What drives the spatial distribution of mosquitoes? , 2013 .

[22]  Ashton M. Shortridge,et al.  Measuring geographic access to health care: raster and network-based methods , 2012, International Journal of Health Geographics.

[23]  Michael Hahsler,et al.  TSPInfrastructure for the Traveling Salesperson Problem , 2007 .

[24]  Kimberly C. Brouwer,et al.  Emerging and Reemerging Neglected Tropical Diseases: a Review of Key Characteristics, Risk Factors, and the Policy and Innovation Environment , 2014, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.

[25]  M. Stanton,et al.  The development of high resolution maps of tsetse abundance to guide interventions against human African trypanosomiasis in northern Uganda , 2018, Parasites & Vectors.

[26]  Damir Demirović,et al.  An Implementation of the Mean Shift Algorithm , 2019, Image Process. Line.

[27]  R. F. Goldman,et al.  Terrain coefficients for energy cost prediction. , 1972, Journal of applied physiology.

[28]  M. Camara,et al.  Tsetse Control and the Elimination of Gambian Sleeping Sickness , 2016, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[29]  R. Snow,et al.  Access to emergency hospital care provided by the public sector in sub-Saharan Africa in 2015: a geocoded inventory and spatial analysis , 2018, The Lancet. Global health.

[30]  E. Fèvre,et al.  Crisis, what crisis? Control of Rhodesian sleeping sickness. , 2006, Trends in parasitology.

[31]  Edsger W. Dijkstra,et al.  A note on two problems in connexion with graphs , 1959, Numerische Mathematik.

[32]  Adam Millard-Ball,et al.  The world’s user-generated road map is more than 80% complete , 2017, PloS one.