Comparative environmental evaluation of aggregate production from recycled waste materials and virgin sources by LCA

Abstract The management of construction and demolition (C&D) waste and waste glass is a serious concern in Hong Kong, as well as other countries due to their non-combustible and non-putrescible nature, and the running out of disposal outlets. However, mineral wastes derived from C&D activities and waste glass are considered to have potential to be re-used as construction materials, especially as aggregates. In addition, Hong Kong urgently needs alternative and sustainable sources of aggregate, as the local quarry sites for aggregate production are expected to be exhausted soon. Many experimental studies have demonstrated that recycled aggregates from C&D waste and waste glass can be potentially recycled for various engineering applications in Hong Kong, but no study has yet attempted to assess the sustainability by lifecycle assessment (LCA) techniques. In order to increase the environmental awareness in the construction industry, assessment of the environmental performance of construction materials by LCA is therefore needed. The present study was conducted to assess and compare the environmental consequences of recycled aggregates production from C&D waste and waste glass, and natural aggregate production from virgin materials by LCA by using case specific and first hand data. The results reveal that compared with natural coarse aggregates, recycled coarse aggregates produced from C&D waste reduce 65% greenhouse gases (GHGs) emission with a saving of 58% non-renewable energy consumption. Similar environmental benefits are observed for producing recycled fine aggregates from C&D waste. In addition, compared with the production of natural fine aggregates from river sand, producing recycled fine aggregates from waste glass saves 54% energy consumption and reduces 61% GHGs, and 46% SO2 eq emissions. According to the IMPACT 2002+ Method, significant health, resource, climate change and ecosystem damages can be saved in producing recycled aggregates from both waste materials compared to producing and importing aggregates from virgin sources. This is the first ever LCA study on producing recycled aggregates from waste glass. Therefore, it can be concluded that substantial net environmental benefits can be realized for producing recycled aggregates from C&D waste and waste glass. The results can provide a guidance to maximize C&D waste and waste glass recycling, resourceful treatment of wastes and conserve natural resources.

[1]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology , 2003 .

[2]  Ahmed Behiry.  Utilization of cement treated recycled concrete aggregates as base or subbase layer in Egypt , 2013 .

[3]  Jack Chin Pang Cheng,et al.  Life cycle carbon footprint measurement of Portland cement and ready mix concrete for a city with local scarcity of resources like Hong Kong , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[4]  Gian Andrea Blengini,et al.  Resources and waste management in Turin (Italy): the role of recycled aggregates in the sustainable supply mix , 2010 .

[5]  Eric Masanet,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of pavements Part II: Filling the research gaps , 2011 .

[6]  Maria Gavrilescu,et al.  Comparing environmental impacts of natural inert and recycled construction and demolition waste processing using LCA , 2013 .

[7]  Mohammad Saghafi,et al.  Recycling value of building materials in building assessment systems , 2011 .

[8]  C. Poon,et al.  Feasible use of recycled concrete aggregates and crushed clay brick as unbound road sub-base , 2006 .

[9]  Chi Sun Poon,et al.  Reducing building waste at construction sites in Hong Kong , 2004 .

[10]  Chi Sun Poon,et al.  Management and recycling of waste glass in concrete products: Current situations in Hong Kong , 2013 .

[11]  Anna Björklund,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a novel hybrid glass-hemp/thermoset composite , 2013 .

[12]  L Rigamonti,et al.  Life cycle assessment for optimising the level of separated collection in integrated MSW management systems. , 2009, Waste management.

[13]  Joseph Mankelow,et al.  Assessing the carbon footprint of transporting primary aggregates , 2010 .

[14]  Oscar Ortiz,et al.  Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA , 2009 .

[15]  Maurizio Cellura,et al.  Life cycle assessment of Italian citrus-based products. Sensitivity analysis and improvement scenarios. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[16]  Agnès Jullien,et al.  Variability in the environmental impacts of aggregate production , 2012 .

[17]  Gilles Escadeillas,et al.  Use of metakaolin to stabilize sewage sludge ash and municipal solid waste incineration fly ash in cement-based materials. , 2012, Journal of hazardous materials.

[18]  Giovanni Andrea Blengini,et al.  Life cycle of buildings, demolition and recycling potential: A case study in Turin, Italy , 2009 .

[19]  Christopher J. Koroneos,et al.  Environmental assessment of brick production in Greece , 2007 .

[20]  Chi Sun Poon,et al.  A comparative study on the feasible use of recycled beverage and CRT funnel glass as fine aggregate in cement mortar , 2012 .

[21]  Dominique Guyonnet,et al.  Quantifying uncertainty in LCA-modelling of waste management systems. , 2012, Waste management.

[22]  J. Brito,et al.  Properties and composition of recycled aggregates from construction and demolition waste suitable for concrete production , 2014 .

[23]  Gian Andrea Blengini,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment guidelines for the sustainable production and recycling of aggregates: the Sustainable Aggregates Resource Management project (SARMa) , 2012 .

[24]  Anna Björklund,et al.  Survey of approaches to improve reliability in lca , 2002 .

[25]  S Marinković,et al.  Comparative environmental assessment of natural and recycled aggregate concrete. , 2010, Waste management.

[26]  F. López Gayarre,et al.  Manufacture of concrete kerbs and floor blocks with recycled aggregate from C&DW , 2013 .

[27]  Desirée Rodríguez-Robles,et al.  Quality Assessment of Mixed and Ceramic Recycled Aggregates from Construction and Demolition Wastes in the Concrete Manufacture According to the Spanish Standard † , 2014, Materials.

[28]  Elena Garbarino,et al.  Sustainability evaluation of natural and recycled aggregates through Life Cycle Assessment , 2007 .

[29]  B. González-Fonteboa,et al.  Concretes with aggregates from demolition waste and silica fume. Materials and mechanical properties , 2008 .

[30]  Teh Fu Yen,et al.  Encapsulation of lead from hazardous CRT glass wastes using biopolymer cross-linked concrete systems. , 2009, Waste management.

[31]  J. M. Chimenos,et al.  Aggregate material formulated with MSWI bottom ash and APC fly ash for use as secondary building material. , 2013, Waste management.

[32]  S. Ryding.  ISO 14042 Environmental management • Life cycle assessment • life cycle impact assessment , 1999 .

[33]  Marios Soutsos,et al.  Use of recycled demolition aggregate in precast products, phase II: Concrete paving blocks , 2011 .

[34]  Chi Sun Poon,et al.  Enhancing the performance of pre-cast concrete blocks by incorporating waste glass - : ASR consideration , 2007 .

[35]  C. Poon,et al.  Effects of contaminants on the properties of concrete paving blocks prepared with recycled concrete aggregates , 2007 .

[36]  Ioanna Papayianni,et al.  Comparative life cycle assessment of concrete road pavements using industrial by-products as alternative materials , 2015 .

[37]  T. Astrup,et al.  Life cycle assessment of construction and demolition waste management. , 2015, Waste management.