Learning to Decode Cognitive States from Brain Images

Over the past decade, functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) has emerged as a powerful new instrument to collect vast quantities of data about activity in the human brain. A typical fMRI experiment can produce a three-dimensional image related to the human subject's brain activity every half second, at a spatial resolution of a few millimeters. As in other modern empirical sciences, this new instrumentation has led to a flood of new data, and a corresponding need for new data analysis methods. We describe recent research applying machine learning methods to the problem of classifying the cognitive state of a human subject based on fRMI data observed over a single time interval. In particular, we present case studies in which we have successfully trained classifiers to distinguish cognitive states such as (1) whether the human subject is looking at a picture or a sentence, (2) whether the subject is reading an ambiguous or non-ambiguous sentence, and (3) whether the word the subject is viewing is a word describing food, people, buildings, etc. This learning problem provides an interesting case study of classifier learning from extremely high dimensional (105 features), extremely sparse (tens of training examples), noisy data. This paper summarizes the results obtained in these three case studies, as well as lessons learned about how to successfully apply machine learning methods to train classifiers in such settings.

[1]  Christopher R. Genovese Statistical Inference in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1997 .

[2]  Lars Kai Hansen,et al.  The Quantitative Evaluation of Functional Neuroimaging Experiments: The NPAIRS Data Analysis Framework , 2000, NeuroImage.

[3]  A. Galaburda,et al.  Human Cerebral Cortex: Localization, Parcellation, and Morphometry with Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Distributed representation of objects in the human ventral visual pathway. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  W. Montague,et al.  Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms , 1969 .

[6]  A. Dale,et al.  Building memories: remembering and forgetting of verbal experiences as predicted by brain activity. , 1998, Science.

[7]  Marcel Adam Just,et al.  Ambiguity in the brain: what brain imaging reveals about the processing of syntactically ambiguous sentences. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[9]  L. K. Hansen,et al.  On Clustering fMRI Time Series , 1999, NeuroImage.

[11]  L. K. Hansen,et al.  The Quantitative Evaluation of Functional Neuroimaging Experiments: The NPAIRS Data Analysis Framework , 2000, NeuroImage.

[12]  Tom W. Keller,et al.  Reading Span and the Time-course of Cortical Activation in Sentence-Picture Verification , 2001 .

[13]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Text Classification from Labeled and Unlabeled Documents using EM , 2000, Machine Learning.

[14]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Mental chronometry using latency-resolved functional MRI. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  S. C. Strother,et al.  The Quantitative Evaluation of Functional Neuroimaging Experiments: Mutual Information Learning Curves , 2002, NeuroImage.

[16]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  An Area within Human Ventral Cortex Sensitive to “Building” Stimuli Evidence and Implications , 1998, Neuron.

[17]  N. Makris,et al.  MRI-Based Topographic Parcellation of Human Neocortex: An Anatomically Specified Method with Estimate of Reliability , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  Tom M. Mitchell,et al.  Classifying Instantaneous Cognitive States from fMRI Data , 2003, AMIA.

[19]  Tom M. Mitchell,et al.  Training fMRI Classifiers to Detect Cognitive States across Multiple Human Subjects , 2003, NIPS 2003.

[20]  David D. Cox,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) “brain reading”: detecting and classifying distributed patterns of fMRI activity in human visual cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[21]  S Makeig,et al.  Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial components , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[22]  Alex Martin,et al.  Experience-dependent modulation of category-related cortical activity. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[24]  Thorsten Joachims,et al.  A statistical learning learning model of text classification for support vector machines , 2001, SIGIR '01.

[25]  M. Just,et al.  Computational modeling of high‐level cognition and brain function , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[26]  R. Savoy Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) , 2002 .

[27]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Classifying Single Trial EEG: Towards Brain Computer Interfacing , 2001, NIPS.

[28]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  On Discriminative vs. Generative Classifiers: A comparison of logistic regression and naive Bayes , 2001, NIPS.

[29]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Bayesian Modelling of fMRI lime Series , 1999, NIPS.

[30]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[31]  J. Haxby,et al.  Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited , 1995, NeuroImage.

[33]  Thomas G. Dietterich What is machine learning? , 2020, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[34]  Audris Mockus,et al.  The Challenge of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1999 .

[35]  John R. Anderson,et al.  An information-processing model of the BOLD response in symbol manipulation tasks , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[36]  Yiming Yang,et al.  An Evaluation of Statistical Approaches to Text Categorization , 1999, Information Retrieval.