The Evaluation of Photogrammetry-Based DSM from Low- Cost UAV by LiDAR-Based DSM

Background and Purpose: Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are flexible to solve various surveying tasks which make them useful in many disciplines, including forestry. The main goal of this research is to evaluate the quality of photogrammetry-based digital surface model (DSM) from low-cost UAV’s images collected in non-optimal weather (windy and cloudy weather) and environmental (inaccessibility for regular spatial distribution of ground control points - GCPs) conditions. Materials and Methods: The UAV-based DSMs without (DSMP) and with using GCPs (DSMP- GCP) were generated. The vertical agreement assessment of the UAV-based DSMs was conducted by comparing elevations of 60 checkpoints of a regular 100 m sampling grid obtained from LiDAR-based DSM (DSML) with the elevations of planimetrically corresponding points obtained from DSMP and DSMP-GCP. Due to the non-normal distribution of residuals (vertical differences between UAV- and LiDAR-based DSMs), a vertical agreement was assessed by using robust measures: median, normalised median absolute deviation (NMAD), 68.3% quantile and 95% quantile. Results: As expected, DSMP-GCP shows higher accuracy, i.e. higher vertical agreement with DSML than DSMP. The median, NMAD, 68.3% quantile, 95% quantile and RMSE* (without outliers) values for DSMP are 2.23 m, 3.22 m, 4.34 m, 15.04 m and 5.10 m, respectively, whereas for DSMP-GCP amount to -1.33 m, 2.77 m, 0.11 m, 8.15 m and 3.54 m, respectively. Conclusions: The obtained results confirmed great potential of images obtained by low-cost UAV for forestry applications, even if they are surveyed in non-optimal weather and environmental conditions. This could be of importance for cases when urgent UAV surveys are needed (e.g. detection and estimation of forest damage) which do not allow careful and longer survey planning. The vertical agreement assessment of UAV-based DSMs with LiDAR-based DSM confirmed the importance of GCPs for image orientation and DSM generation. Namely, a considerable improvement in vertical accuracy of UAV-based DSMs was observed when GCPs were used.

[1]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Comparing ALS and Image-Based Point Cloud Metrics and Modelled Forest Inventory Attributes in a Complex Coastal Forest Environment , 2015 .

[2]  F. Nex,et al.  UAV for 3D mapping applications: a review , 2014 .

[3]  Y. Hu,et al.  Mapping canopy height using a combination of digital stereo‐photogrammetry and lidar , 2008 .

[4]  Hrvoje Marjanović,et al.  Quality assessment of high density digital surface model over different land cover classes , 2016, Periodicum Biologorum.

[5]  José Antonio Manzanera,et al.  Comparing airborne laser scanning-imagery fusion methods based on geometric accuracy in forested areas , 2011 .

[6]  S. Shapiro,et al.  A Comparative Study of Various Tests for Normality , 1968 .

[7]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Performance of dense digital surface models based on image matching in the estimation of plot-level forest variables , 2013 .

[8]  I. Woodhouse,et al.  Structure from Motion (SfM) Photogrammetry with Drone Data: A Low Cost Method for Monitoring Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Forests in Developing Countries , 2017 .

[9]  Michael Höhle,et al.  Accuracy assessment of digital elevation models by means of robust statistical methods , 2009 .

[10]  I. Colomina,et al.  Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review , 2014 .

[11]  L. Tang,et al.  Drone remote sensing for forestry research and practices , 2015, Journal of Forestry Research.

[12]  Guoqing Sun,et al.  Evaluation of UAV-based forest inventory system compared with LiDAR data , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS).

[13]  Jennifer N. Hird,et al.  Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Monitoring Recovery of Forest Vegetation on Petroleum Well Sites , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[14]  S. Shapiro,et al.  An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples) , 1965 .

[15]  Eija Honkavaara,et al.  Using UAV-Based Photogrammetry and Hyperspectral Imaging for Mapping Bark Beetle Damage at Tree-Level , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[16]  Robert S. Nuske,et al.  Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) to Quantify Spatial Gap Patterns in Forests , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[17]  Eduardo González-Ferreiro,et al.  Short Communication. Using high resolution UAV imagery to estimate tree variables in Pinus pinea plantation in Portugal , 2016 .

[18]  M. Gašparović,et al.  TWO-STEP CAMERA CALIBRATION METHOD DEVELOPED FOR MICRO UAV'S , 2016 .

[19]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Inventory of Small Forest Areas Using an Unmanned Aerial System , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[20]  Close Range Photogrammetry in the Survey of the Coastal Area Geoecological Conditions (on the Example of Portugal) , 2015 .

[21]  Mateo Gasparovic,et al.  Gimbal Influence on the Stability of Exterior Orientation Parameters of UAV Acquired Images , 2017, Sensors.

[22]  John Ignatius Griffin,et al.  Statistics; methods and applications , 1963 .

[23]  Andrea Berton,et al.  Forestry applications of UAVs in Europe: a review , 2017 .

[24]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Biomass Estimation Using 3D Data from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Imagery in a Tropical Woodland , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[25]  Stuart Barr,et al.  UAV-BORNE THERMAL IMAGING FOR FOREST HEALTH MONITORING: DETECTION OF DISEASE-INDUCED CANOPY TEMPERATURE INCREASE , 2015 .

[26]  Anita Simic Milas,et al.  Different colours of shadows: classification of UAV images , 2017 .

[27]  Lars T. Waser,et al.  High‐quality image matching and automated generation of 3D tree models , 2008 .

[28]  C. Schmullius,et al.  Comparison of UAV photograph-based and airborne lidar-based point clouds over forest from a forestry application perspective , 2017 .

[29]  Jonathan P. Dash,et al.  Assessing very high resolution UAV imagery for monitoring forest health during a simulated disease outbreak , 2017 .

[30]  R. Viitala,et al.  Unmanned aerial system imagery and photogrammetric canopy height data in area-based estimation of forest variables , 2015 .

[31]  Martin Rehak.  Integrated Sensor Orientation on Micro Aerial Vehicles , 2017 .

[32]  Martina L. Hobi,et al.  Accuracy Assessment of Digital Surface Models Based on WorldView-2 and ADS80 Stereo Remote Sensing Data , 2012, Sensors.

[33]  L. Wallace,et al.  Snow Depth Retrieval with UAS Using Photogrammetric Techniques , 2015 .

[34]  Farhad Samadzadegan,et al.  EVALUATING THE POTENTIAL OF RTK-UAV FOR AUTOMATIC POINT CLOUD GENERATION IN 3D RAPID MAPPING , 2016 .

[35]  L. Wallace,et al.  Assessment of Forest Structure Using Two UAV Techniques: A Comparison of Airborne Laser Scanning and Structure from Motion (SfM) Point Clouds , 2016 .

[36]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[37]  The Photogrammetric Derivation of Digital Terrain Models in Built-up Areas , 2010 .