The effect of visual feedback types on the wait indicator interface of a mobile application

Abstract This study examines the essential effects of visual feedback on users’ perceptions of time and on their evaluations of waiting time for a mobile application user interface. The two variables adopted in this experiment are wait indicator visual feedback and waiting time. Three types of visual feedback were used: bar indicator, pie indicator, and cartoon indicator. Three waiting times were used: 2 s, 5 s, and 10 s. This study was conducted based on the attentional-gate model of Zakay and Block to help investigate user time perceptions. The experiment of this study was a 3 × 3 mixed factorial design to measure the impact of the research variables on the users’ perceptions of waiting time, wait evaluations, and preferences. Results showed that the users’ time perceptions and wait evaluations were affected by the feedback types and waiting times, and the results are consistent with Vierordt's law and the attentional-gate model. Furthermore, there was a positive impact on the participants' preferences when they perceived a shorter waiting time. The cartoon type feedback can help reduce the perception of waiting time, but it does not necessarily improve user experience regarding short waiting time.

[1]  Dan Saffer,et al.  Microinteractions: Designing with Details , 2013 .

[2]  Douglas Poynter,et al.  Chapter 8 Judging the Duration of Time Intervals: A Process of Remembering Segments of Experience , 1989 .

[3]  Christopher A. Sanchez,et al.  Feedback Preferences and Impressions of Waiting , 2009, Hum. Factors.

[4]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing for fun: how can we design user interfaces to be more fun? , 2004, INTR.

[5]  Karl Vierordt,et al.  Der Zeitsinn nach Versuchen , 1868 .

[6]  F. Macar,et al.  Controlled attention sharing influences time estimation , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[7]  Allan Kuchinsky,et al.  Quality is in the eye of the beholder: meeting users' requirements for Internet quality of service , 2000, CHI.

[8]  Steven Hoober,et al.  Designing Mobile Interfaces , 2011 .

[9]  Kaori Yoshida,et al.  How does Shape of Progress Bar Effect on Time Evaluation , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems.

[10]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction , 2002 .

[11]  Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah,et al.  A study on tolerable waiting time: how long are Web users willing to wait? , 2004, AMCIS.

[12]  T. S. Amer,et al.  Information Technology Progress Indicators: Temporal Expectancy, User Preference, and the Perception of Process Duration , 2016, Int. J. Technol. Hum. Interact..

[13]  Joakim Nivre,et al.  On the Semantics and Pragmatics of Linguistic Feedback , 1992, J. Semant..

[14]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Response time and display rate in human performance with computers , 1984, CSUR.

[15]  Wilbert O. Galitz,et al.  The Essential Guide to User Interface Design: An Introduction to GUI Design Principles and Techniques , 1996 .

[16]  Woojoo Kim,et al.  Effect of Loading Symbol of Online Video on Perception of Waiting Time , 2017, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[17]  Carine Lallemand,et al.  Enhancing User eXperience during waiting time in HCI: contributions of cognitive psychology , 2012, DIS '12.

[18]  P. Fraisse Perception and estimation of time. , 1984, Annual review of psychology.

[19]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[20]  Makio Ishihara,et al.  Manipulating Animation Speed of Progress Bars to Shorten Time Perception , 2015, HCI.

[21]  David Reitter,et al.  Impatience Induced by Waiting: An Effect Moderated by the Speed of Countdowns , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[22]  H. Foley,et al.  Sensation and Perception , 2019 .

[23]  Nicholas S. Lockwood,et al.  The Effect of Feedback on Web Site Delay: A Perceptual and Physiological Study , 2011 .

[24]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing The User Interface , 2013 .