“Compliant Supporters,” “Anxious Skeptics,” and “Defiant Deniers”: A Latent Profile Analysis of People’s Responses to COVID-19 Communications

This study investigates whether people's responses to official communications about COVID-19 could be "profiled" with respect to socio-economic-demographic and behavioral characteristics. Such profiles could enhance the effectiveness of future crisis management through the use of profile-adapted communications that maximize message comprehension. A representative web panel survey (742 respondents) was conducted across Switzerland in February 2022 to assess the population's reaction to COVID-19 communications during the pandemic. Latent profile analysis was conducted to explore if distinct profiles of reactions to the communications would emerge, and how each of them relate to conspiracy mentality and SED measures. The analyses revealed three latent profiles: "Compliant supporters" (54%), "defiant deniers" (23.6%), and "anxious skeptics" (22.4%). Respondents with high conspiracy mentality were more likely to belong to "defiant deniers" or "anxious skeptics." Each profile was characterized by distinct SED and behavioral features (discussed in the paper). The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated that one communication does not work for all people. Our study evidenced three different types of respondent profiles that require profile-adapted communications for more effective crisis control. Our study is the first to profile people's responses to COVID-19 communications in a systematic, person-centered way. The results can be used for more effective future crisis management that delivers to each profile's communicative needs.

[1]  Michael Y. Ni,et al.  Mental disorders following COVID-19 and other epidemics: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2022, Translational Psychiatry.

[2]  Robert P. Lennon,et al.  ‘Us-Versus-Them’: Othering in COVID-19 public health behavior compliance , 2022, PloS one.

[3]  L. Miceli,et al.  Uncertainty in Health Emergencies: Communicating Risks During COVID-19 Response , 2022, Frontiers in Communication.

[4]  Abdulhadi A. Alamodi,et al.  The current global perspective of the knowledge-attitude-behavior of the general public towards the corona virus disease -19 pandemic: Systematic review and meta-analysis on 67,143 participants , 2021, PloS one.

[5]  Wenjing Pian,et al.  The causes, impacts and countermeasures of COVID-19 “Infodemic”: A systematic review using narrative synthesis , 2021, Information Processing & Management.

[6]  J. Lazarus,et al.  COVID-SCORE: A global survey to assess public perceptions of government responses to COVID-19 (COVID-SCORE-10) , 2020, PloS one.

[7]  Mo Wang,et al.  Latent profile analysis: A review and “how to” guide of its application within vocational behavior research , 2020, Journal of Vocational Behavior.

[8]  N. Salari,et al.  Prevalence of stress, anxiety, depression among the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2020, Globalization and Health.

[9]  S. Naeem,et al.  The Covid‐19 ‘infodemic’: a new front for information professionals , 2020, Health information and libraries journal.

[10]  S. Katikireddi,et al.  Mitigating the wider health effects of covid-19 pandemic response , 2020, BMJ.

[11]  N. Meshkati,et al.  COVID-19: An Urgent Call for Coordinated, Trusted Sources to Tell Everyone What They Need to Know and Do. , 2020, NAM perspectives.

[12]  J. Halberstadt,et al.  The Conspiracy Mentality Scale , 2019, Social Psychology.

[13]  Joshua M. Rosenberg,et al.  tidyLPA: An R Package to Easily Carry Out Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) Using Open-Source or Commercial Software , 2018, J. Open Source Softw..

[14]  A. Hannawa “SACCIA Safe Communication”: Five core competencies for safe and high-quality care , 2018, Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management.

[15]  Katherine E. Masyn,et al.  Latent Class Analysis and Finite Mixture Modeling , 2013 .

[16]  Laura K. Guerrero,et al.  Perceptions of Conflict Behavior and Relational Satisfaction in Adult Parent–Child Relationships , 2012, Commun. Res..

[17]  B. Muthén,et al.  Deciding on the Number of Classes in Latent Class Analysis and Growth Mixture Modeling: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study , 2007 .

[18]  P. Fearon,et al.  Antisocial Beliefs and Attitudes in Pre-adolescent and Adolescent Youth: the Development of the Antisocial Beliefs and Attitudes Scales (ABAS) , 2007 .

[19]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  A Short Scale for Measuring Loneliness in Large Surveys , 2004, Research on aging.

[20]  R. Snaith,et al.  The Hospital Anxiety And Depression Scale , 2003, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[21]  Brian H. Spitzberg,et al.  Coping With Obsessive Relational Intrusion and Stalking: The Role of Social Support and Coping Strategies , 2012, Violence and Victims.