Understanding Perceived Barriers to Colposcopy Follow-Up Among Underserved Women at an Urban Teaching Hospital: A Qualitative Study

Inadequate knowledge was the most commonly identified barrier to colposcopy follow-up during qualitative interviews of 18 women despite positive perceptions of physician communication and education. Objective Loss to follow-up after abnormal cervical cancer screening disproportionately impacts underserved populations. Our objective was to identify perceived barriers to follow-up after abnormal Pap smear among underserved women. Methods Women with abnormal Pap smear presenting for colposcopy at an urban teaching hospital were asked to participate in qualitative interviews. A topic guide was developed to assess knowledge about cervical cancer screening and perceived barriers to follow-up. A demographic survey was completed and interviews were recorded and transcribed. Responses were coded and placed into a framework: intrapersonal, interpersonal, and community barriers. Major themes and subthemes were identified. Demographic data were reported descriptively. Results Of 24 women enrolled, 18 (75%) completed full interviews. Median age was 38 years (range = 21–64). Participants were racially diverse: 10 (56%) Hispanic, 7 (39%) non-Hispanic White, 1 (5.5%) non-Hispanic Black, and 1 (5.5%) Asian, and all had public insurance. Seven (39%) presented for their 1st colposcopy visit and 11 (61%) had previous visits. Seventeen (94%) had a positive human papillomavirus test and 7 (39%) had atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. The most common themes identified were related to knowledge gaps, including lack of understanding of Pap smears/human papillomavirus and cervical cancer risk factors. Most participants were satisfied with provider communication but dissatisfied with communication with the office, like scheduling appointments. Conclusions Despite positive patient perception of physician communication, knowledge was most commonly identified as a barrier to colposcopy follow-up. Implementing a web-based intervention addressing knowledge gaps may improve abnormal cervical cancer screening follow-up among this population.

[1]  J. Farley,et al.  Disparities in pap smear screening follow up: A catalyst for collective action vs. collective despair. , 2021, Gynecologic oncology.

[2]  R. Leach,et al.  Differences in cervical cancer screening and follow-up for black and white women in the United States. , 2020, Gynecologic oncology.

[3]  G. Zimet,et al.  Persistent Disparities in Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake: Knowledge and Sociodemographic Determinants of Papanicolaou and Human Papillomavirus Testing Among Women in the United States , 2020, Public health reports.

[4]  M. Safford,et al.  Evaluation of the Patient Activated Learning System (PALS) to improve knowledge acquisition, retention, and medication decision making among hypertensive adults: Results of a pilot randomized controlled trial. , 2019, Patient education and counseling.

[5]  Erin D. Snyder,et al.  Continuity of Care in Resident Outpatient Clinics: A Scoping Review of the Literature. , 2018, Journal of graduate medical education.

[6]  Kavishwar B. Wagholikar,et al.  Impact of Patient Reminders on Papanicolaou Test Completion for High-Risk Patients Identified by a Clinical Decision Support System , 2018, Journal of women's health.

[7]  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 729: Importance of Social Determinants of Health and Cultural Awareness in the Delivery of Reproductive Health Care. , 2018, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  Deborah E. White,et al.  Thematic Analysis , 2017 .

[9]  Matthew L. Anderson,et al.  Avoidable tragedies: Disparities in healthcare access among medically underserved women diagnosed with cervical cancer. , 2015, Gynecologic oncology.

[10]  K. Freund,et al.  Impact of patient and navigator race and language concordance on care after cancer screening abnormalities , 2015, Cancer.

[11]  M. Murray,et al.  Qualitative Research in Clinical and Health Psychology , 2014 .

[12]  E. Chapman-Davis,et al.  Gynecologic cancer disparities: a report from the Health Disparities Taskforce of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology. , 2014, Gynecologic oncology.

[13]  P. Moorman,et al.  Factors Associated With Adherence to Follow-up Colposcopy , 2013, American journal of health education.

[14]  E. Calhoun,et al.  Patient barriers to follow-up care for breast and cervical cancer abnormalities. , 2013, Journal of women's health.

[15]  A. Clarke,et al.  Cervical Cancer Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment Interventions for Racial and Ethnic Minorities: A Systematic Review , 2012, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[16]  Johanna L. Goderre,et al.  Correlating Knowledge of Cervical Cancer Prevention and Human Papillomavirus With Compliance After Colposcopy Referral , 2012, Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease.

[17]  M. Wolf,et al.  What Did the Doctor Say? Health Literacy and Recall of Medical Instructions , 2012, Medical care.

[18]  Kevin Fiscella,et al.  National Cancer Institute Patient Navigation Research Program , 2008, Cancer.

[19]  A. Coker,et al.  Understanding barriers for adherence to follow-up care for abnormal pap tests. , 2007, Journal of women's health.

[20]  M. Follen,et al.  Knowledge of cervical dysplasia and human papillomavirus among women seen in a colposcopy clinic. , 2005, Gynecologic oncology.

[21]  H. Ngan,et al.  Could precolposcopy information and counseling reduce women's anxiety and improve knowledge and compliance to follow-up? , 2004, Gynecologic oncology.

[22]  Patricia Garcia,et al.  The association of health literacy with cervical cancer prevention knowledge and health behaviors in a multiethnic cohort of women. , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[23]  Simu K. Thomas,et al.  Association of Knowledge, Anxiety, and Fear with Adherence to Follow Up for Colposcopy , 2002, Journal of lower genital tract disease.

[24]  C. Dunton,et al.  Knowledge Base as a Predictor of Follow‐Up Compliance After Colposcopy , 1997, Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease.

[25]  National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: cervical cancer, April 1-3, 1996. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel. , 1996, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[26]  R. Andersen Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? , 1995, Journal of health and social behavior.

[27]  R. Andersen,et al.  A framework for the study of access to medical care. , 1974, Health services research.