Best Linear Unbiased Prediction of Genomic Breeding Values Using a Trait-Specific Marker-Derived Relationship Matrix

Background With the availability of high density whole-genome single nucleotide polymorphism chips, genomic selection has become a promising method to estimate genetic merit with potentially high accuracy for animal, plant and aquaculture species of economic importance. With markers covering the entire genome, genetic merit of genotyped individuals can be predicted directly within the framework of mixed model equations, by using a matrix of relationships among individuals that is derived from the markers. Here we extend that approach by deriving a marker-based relationship matrix specifically for the trait of interest. Methodology/Principal Findings In the framework of mixed model equations, a new best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) method including a trait-specific relationship matrix (TA) was presented and termed TABLUP. The TA matrix was constructed on the basis of marker genotypes and their weights in relation to the trait of interest. A simulation study with 1,000 individuals as the training population and five successive generations as candidate population was carried out to validate the proposed method. The proposed TABLUP method outperformed the ridge regression BLUP (RRBLUP) and BLUP with realized relationship matrix (GBLUP). It performed slightly worse than BayesB with an accuracy of 0.79 in the standard scenario. Conclusions/Significance The proposed TABLUP method is an improvement of the RRBLUP and GBLUP method. It might be equivalent to the BayesB method but it has additional benefits like the calculation of accuracies for individual breeding values. The results also showed that the TA-matrix performs better in predicting ability than the classical numerator relationship matrix and the realized relationship matrix which are derived solely from pedigree or markers without regard to the trait. This is because the TA-matrix not only accounts for the Mendelian sampling term, but also puts the greater emphasis on those markers that explain more of the genetic variance in the trait.

[1]  T. H. E. Meuwissen,et al.  Marker based estimates of between and within population kinships for the conservation of genetic diversity , 2001 .

[2]  T. Meuwissen,et al.  Testing strategies for genomic selection in aquaculture breeding programs , 2009, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[3]  P. Lichtner,et al.  The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle , 2010, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[4]  M P L Calus,et al.  Genomic breeding value prediction: methods and procedures. , 2010, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[5]  H. Grüneberg,et al.  Introduction to quantitative genetics , 1960 .

[6]  I Misztal,et al.  A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  D. Garrick,et al.  Technical note: Derivation of equivalent computing algorithms for genomic predictions and reliabilities of animal merit. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[8]  J. Woolliams,et al.  Inbreeding in genome-wide selection. , 2007, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[9]  P. Visscher,et al.  Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. , 2009, Genetics research.

[10]  M. Goddard.  Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response , 2009, Genetica.

[11]  M. Goddard,et al.  Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  Ben J Hayes,et al.  Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations , 2009, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[13]  J. Woolliams,et al.  Reducing dimensionality for prediction of genome-wide breeding values , 2009, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[14]  Sang Hong Lee,et al.  Predicting Unobserved Phenotypes for Complex Traits from Whole-Genome SNP Data , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[15]  B. J. Hayes,et al.  Genomic selection: Genomic selection , 2007 .

[16]  J. Woolliams,et al.  The Accuracy of Genomic Selection in Norwegian Red Cattle Assessed by Cross-Validation , 2009, Genetics.

[17]  M. Goddard,et al.  Genomic selection. , 2007, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[18]  M. Goddard,et al.  The distribution of the effects of genes affecting quantitative traits in livestock , 2001, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[19]  Shizhong Xu.  Estimating polygenic effects using markers of the entire genome. , 2003, Genetics.

[20]  Jean-Luc Jannink,et al.  Genomic selection in plant breeding: from theory to practice. , 2010, Briefings in functional genomics.

[21]  M. Goddard,et al.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. , 2001, Genetics.

[22]  John A Woolliams,et al.  A fast algorithm for BayesB type of prediction of genome-wide estimates of genetic value , 2009, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[23]  J. Woolliams,et al.  Genomic selection using different marker types and densities. , 2008, Journal of animal science.

[24]  W. Muir,et al.  Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters. , 2007, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[25]  Manuel A. R. Ferreira,et al.  Assumption-Free Estimation of Heritability from Genome-Wide Identity-by-Descent Sharing between Full Siblings , 2006, PLoS genetics.

[26]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[27]  K. Weigel,et al.  Machine learning classification procedure for selecting SNPs in genomic selection: application to early mortality in broilers. , 2007, Developments in biologicals.

[28]  S. Jain,et al.  GENETIC STRUCTURE OF POPULATIONS. , 1975, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  M P L Calus,et al.  Accuracy of breeding values when using and ignoring the polygenic effect in genomic breeding value estimation with a marker density of one SNP per cM. , 2007, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[30]  L R Schaeffer,et al.  Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle. , 2006, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[31]  A. Nejati-Javaremi,et al.  Effect of total allelic relationship on accuracy of evaluation and response to selection. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[32]  R. Fernando,et al.  The Impact of Genetic Relationship Information on Genome-Assisted Breeding Values , 2007, Genetics.

[33]  T. Meuwissen,et al.  Accuracy of breeding values of 'unrelated' individuals predicted by dense SNP genotyping , 2009, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[34]  M. Lund,et al.  Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped , 2010, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[35]  T. Meuwissen,et al.  Comparison of accuracy of genome-wide and BLUP breeding value estimates in sib based aquaculture breeding schemes. , 2009 .

[36]  C. R. Henderson.  Rapid Method for Computing the Inverse of a Relationship Matrix , 1975 .

[37]  J. Crow,et al.  THE NUMBER OF ALLELES THAT CAN BE MAINTAINED IN A FINITE POPULATION. , 1964, Genetics.

[38]  M. Goddard,et al.  Technical note: prediction of breeding values using marker-derived relationship matrices. , 2008, Journal of animal science.

[39]  J. Woolliams,et al.  The Impact of Genetic Architecture on Genome-Wide Evaluation Methods , 2010, Genetics.

[40]  Jean-Luc Jannink,et al.  Factors Affecting Accuracy From Genomic Selection in Populations Derived From Multiple Inbred Lines: A Barley Case Study , 2009, Genetics.

[41]  M. Goddard,et al.  Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[42]  J C Whittaker,et al.  Marker-assisted selection using ridge regression. , 2000, Genetical research.