Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of volume measurement of knee cartilage segmented from the OAI MR image set using a novel semi-automated segmentation method.

OBJECTIVE We developed a semi-automated method based on a graph-cuts algorithm for segmentation and volumetric measurements of the cartilage from high-resolution knee magnetic resonance (MR) images from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) database and assessed the intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of measurements obtained via this method. DESIGN MR image sets from 20 subjects of varying Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grades (from 0 to IV) on fixed flexion knee radiographs were selected from the baseline double-echo and steady-state (DESS) knee MR images in the OAI database (0.B.1 Imaging Data set). Two trained radiologists independently performed the segmentation of knee cartilage twice using the semi-automated method. The volumes of segmented cartilage were computed and compared. The intra- and inter-observer reproducibility were determined by means of the coefficient of variation (CV%) of repeated cartilage segmented volume measurements. The subjects were also divided into the low- (0, I or II) and high-KL (III or IV) groups. The differences in cartilage volume measurements and CV% within and between the observers were tested with t tests. RESULTS The mean (+/-SD) intra-observer CV% for the 20 cases was 1.29 (+/-1.05)% for observer 1 and 1.67 (+/-1.14)% for observer 2, while the mean (+/-SD) inter-observer CV% was 1.31 (+/-1.26)% for session 1 and 1.79 (+/-1.72)% for session 2. There was no significant difference between the two intra-observer CV%'s (P=0.272) and between the two inter-observer CV%'s (P=0.353). The mean intra-observer CV% of the low-KL group was significantly smaller than that for the high-KL group for observer 1 (0.83 vs 1.86%: P=0.025). The segmentation processing times used by the two observers were significantly different (observer 1 vs 2): (mean 49+/-12 vs 33+/-6min) for session 1 and (49+/-8 vs 32+/-8min) for session 2. CONCLUSION The semi-automated graph-cuts method allowed us to segment and measure cartilage from high-resolution 3T MR images of the knee with high intra- and inter-observer reproducibility in subjects with varying severity of OA.

[1]  F. Cicuttini,et al.  Gender differences in knee cartilage volume as measured by magnetic resonance imaging. , 1999, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[2]  Monica Barbu-McInnis,et al.  Knee cartilage extraction and bone-cartilage interface analysis from 3D MRI data sets , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[3]  Olga Veksler,et al.  Markov random fields with efficient approximations , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Cat. No.98CB36231).

[4]  L D Hall,et al.  Measurement of localized cartilage volume and thickness of human knee joints by computer analysis of three-dimensional magnetic resonance images. , 1998, Investigative radiology.

[5]  Andrew J Wheaton,et al.  Cartilage volume quantification via Live Wire segmentation. , 2004, Academic radiology.

[6]  Jacek Kopec,et al.  Reliability of the knee examination in osteoarthritis: effect of standardization. , 2004, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[7]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  OBJ CUT , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[8]  T. Spector,et al.  Osteoarthritis: New Insights. Part 1: The Disease and Its Risk Factors , 2000, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[9]  Timothy E. McAlindon,et al.  Osteoarthritis: New Insights , 2002 .

[10]  F Eckstein,et al.  Accuracy of cartilage volume and thickness measurements with magnetic resonance imaging. , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  J Duryea,et al.  Novel fast semi-automated software to segment cartilage for knee MR acquisitions. , 2007, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[12]  D G Disler,et al.  Articular cartilage volume in the knee: semiautomated determination from three-dimensional reformations of MR images. , 1996, Radiology.

[13]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  Quantitative MRI of cartilage and bone: degenerative changes in osteoarthritis , 2006, NMR in biomedicine.

[14]  F Eckstein,et al.  Use of novel interactive input devices for segmentation of articular cartilage from magnetic resonance images. , 2005, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[15]  John Andrew Lynch,et al.  Cartilage segmentation of 3D MRI scans of the osteoarthritic knee combining user knowledge and active contours , 2000, Medical Imaging: Image Processing.

[16]  Stephen L. Gandy,et al.  Diurnal variation in the femoral articular cartilage of the knee in young adult humans , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  C J Taylor,et al.  The use of active shape models for making thickness measurements of articular cartilage from MR images , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  S Majumdar,et al.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis. , 2007, European cells & materials.

[19]  Anthony Lewis Brooks,et al.  SoundScapes: non-formal learning potentials from interactive VEs , 2007, SIGGRAPH '07.

[20]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of articular cartilage in knee osteoarthritis (OA): morphological assessment. , 2006, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[21]  Claude Kauffmann,et al.  Computer-aided method for quantification of cartilage thickness and volume changes using MRI: validation study using a synthetic model , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  R. Putz,et al.  Determination of knee joint cartilage thickness using three‐dimensional magnetic resonance chondro‐crassometry (3D MR‐CCM) , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  T Stammberger,et al.  Interobserver reproducibility of quantitative cartilage measurements: comparison of B-spline snakes and manual segmentation. , 1999, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[24]  Gareth Funka-Lea,et al.  Graph Cuts and Efficient N-D Image Segmentation , 2006, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[25]  Vladimir Kolmogorov,et al.  "GrabCut": interactive foreground extraction using iterated graph cuts , 2004, ACM Trans. Graph..

[26]  R Burgkart,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging-based assessment of cartilage loss in severe osteoarthritis: accuracy, precision, and diagnostic value. , 2001, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[27]  C C Glüer,et al.  Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imaging: optimization and validation. , 1994, Radiology.