A Supply Side Story for a Threshold Model: Endogenous Growth of the Free and Open Source Community

The study of social institutions producing and disseminating knowledge has mainly concentrated on two main concepts: Science and Technology. This paper examines a recent institutional form that seems not to resemble either of the other two; that is, knowledge-intensive communities, where individuals freely exchange knowledge through information and communication technology. Using free and open source software as an example, we develop a model where this phenomenon is confronted with Technology with respect to its ability to attract researchers.

[1]  Domenico Siniscalco,et al.  SCIENCE VERSUS PROFIT IN RESEARCH , 2003 .

[2]  W. Edward Steinmueller,et al.  The institutions of open source software: Examining the Debian community , 2008, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[3]  LinYuwei.  Epistemologically multiple actor-centered systems , 2004 .

[4]  Diego Lanzi.  Competition and open source with perfect software compatibility , 2009, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[5]  Nicolas Curien,et al.  Internet and Digital Economics , 2008 .

[6]  Gregorio Robles,et al.  Free/Libre and Open Source Software: Survey and Study - FLOSS FINAL REPORT , 2002 .

[7]  Mikko Mustonen,et al.  Copyleft - the economics of Linux and other open source software , 2003, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[8]  Partha Dasgupta,et al.  Information Disclosure and the Economics of Science and Technology , 1987 .

[9]  Yuwei Lin.  Contextualising knowledge-making in Linux user groups , 2004, First Monday.

[10]  R. Allen,et al.  Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 4 (1983) 1-24. North-Holland COLLECTIVE INVENTION , 1982 .

[11]  J. Tirole,et al.  Some Simple Economics of Open Source , 2002 .

[12]  Andrea Bonaccorsi,et al.  Entry Strategies Under Competing Standards: Hybrid Business Models in the Open Source Software Industry , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[13]  Bert M. Sadowski,et al.  Transition of governance in a mature open software source community: Evidence from the Debian case , 2008, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[14]  Linus Torvalds,et al.  Open Letter on Software Patents from Linux developers , 2003 .

[15]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects , 2007 .

[16]  Linus Dahlander,et al.  Relationships Between Open Source Software Companies and Communities: Observations from Nordic Firms , 2005 .

[17]  Paul A. David,et al.  Community-Based Production of Open Source Software: What Do We Know about the Developers Who Participate? , 2008, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[18]  Jürgen Bitzer,et al.  Bug-fixing and code-writing: The private provision of open source software , 2005, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[19]  James Bessen.  Open Source Software: Free Provision of Complex Public Goods , 2005 .

[20]  Mathieu O’Neil.  Cyberchiefs: Autonomy and Authority in Online Tribes , 2009 .

[21]  Justin P. Johnson,et al.  Economics of Open Source Software , 2001 .

[22]  Yuwei Lin.  Epistemologically multiple actor-centered systems: or, EMACS at work! , 2004, UBIQ.

[23]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  The Emergence of Governance in an Open Source Community , 2007 .

[24]  Andrea Bonaccorsi,et al.  Comparing motivations of individual programmers and firms to take part in the open source movement: From community to business , 2006 .

[25]  Alfonso Gambardella,et al.  Proprietary vs. Public Domain Licensing of Software and Research Products , 2005 .

[26]  Nikolai Bezroukov,et al.  Open Source Software Development as a Special Type of Academic Research (Critique of Vulgar Raymondism) , 1999, First Monday.

[27]  Salvatore Torrisi,et al.  Open Source Software: From Open Science to New Marketing Models , 2002 .

[28]  Linus Dahlander.  Penguin in a new suit: a tale of how de novo entrants emerged to harness free and open source software communities , 2007 .

[29]  Sonali K. Shah,et al.  How Communities Support Innovative Activities: An Exploration of Assistance and Sharing Among End-Users , 2003 .

[30]  Sandra Slaughter,et al.  Understanding the Motivations, Participation, and Performance of Open Source Software Developers: A Longitudinal Study of the Apache Projects , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[31]  Jean-Michel Dalle,et al.  Simulating Code Growth in Libre (Open-Source) Mode , 2005 .

[32]  P. David,et al.  Economic Fundamentals of the Knowledge Society , 2003 .

[33]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[34]  E. Hippel.  Innovation by User Communities: Learning From Open-Source Software , 2001 .

[35]  Jean-Michel Dalle,et al.  The Allocation of Software Development Resources In ‘Open Source’ Production Mode , 2005 .

[36]  Alessandro Nuvolari,et al.  Collective invention during the British , 2004 .

[37]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects , 2003 .

[38]  Robert E. Cole,et al.  From a Firm-Based to a Community-Based Model of Knowledge Creation: The Case of the Linux Kernel Development , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[39]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Threshold Models of Collective Behavior , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[40]  J. Henkel.  Selective revealing in open innovation processes: the case of embedded Linux (gekürzte Version) , 2006 .

[41]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[42]  Lars Frederiksen,et al.  Why Do Users Contribute to Firm-Hosted User Communities? The Case of Computer-Controlled Music Instruments , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[43]  Patrick Cohendet,et al.  Communities of Practice and Epistemic Communities : A Renewed Approach of Organisational Learning within the Firm , .

[44]  A. Arora,et al.  Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy , 2004 .

[45]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  Homesteading the Noosphere , 1998, First Monday.

[46]  Martin W. Wallin,et al.  A man on the inside: Unlocking communities as complementary assets , 2006 .

[47]  Sonali K. Shah.  Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[48]  Utpal M. Dholakia,et al.  Open Source Software User Communities: A Study of Participation in Linux User Groups , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[49]  Andrea Fosfuri,et al.  The Penguin Has Entered the Building: The Commercialization of Open Source Software Products , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[50]  Christopher Podmore.  Information economics and policy: In the United States edited by Michael Rubin Libraries Unlimited, Littleton, CO 1983, 340 pp , 1984 .

[51]  Sam Williams,et al.  Free as in Freedom: Richard Stallman's Crusade for Free Software , 2002 .

[52]  Nicholas Economides,et al.  Two-Sided Competition of Proprietary vs. Open Source Technology Platforms and the Implications for the Software Industry , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[53]  Paul Muller,et al.  Reputation, trust and the dynamics of leadership in communities of practice , 2006 .

[54]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Sources of Innovation , 2016 .

[55]  Justin P. Johnson,et al.  Collaboration, Peer Review and Open Source Software , 2004, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[56]  T. Takalo,et al.  Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy, by Arora, A., Fosfuri, A. and Gambardella, A. Cambridge and London: MIT Press, 2001, xi+338 pp., USD 35.00 (cloth) , 2002 .

[57]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software , 2005 .

[58]  Christopher M. Kelty,et al.  Free Software/Free Science , 2001, First Monday.

[59]  Andrea Bonaccorsi,et al.  Why Open Source Software Can Succeed , 2003 .

[60]  Jesús M. González-Barahona,et al.  Geographic origin of libre software developers , 2008, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[61]  Walt Scacchi,et al.  Free Software: A Case Study of Software Development in a Virtual Organizational Culture , 2003 .

[62]  Nicholas M. Allix.  Book Review: Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 2000 .