Radiation Dose Reduction With Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction Technique for Abdominal Computed Tomography

Purpose The objective of this study was to assess the effect of Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction (SAFIRE) and filtered back-projection (FBP) techniques on abdominal computed tomography (CT) performed with 50% and 75% radiation dose reductions. Methods Twenty-four patients (mean age, 64 ± 14 years; male-female ratio, 10:14) gave informed consent for an institutional review board–approved prospective study involving acquisition of additional research images through the abdomen on 128-slice multi–detector-row CT (SOMATOM Definition Flash) at quality reference mAs of 100 (50% lower dose) and 50 (75% lower dose) over a scan length of 10 cm using combined modulation (CARE Dose 4D). Standard-of-care abdominal CT was performed at 200 quality reference mAs, with remaining parameters held constant. The 50- and 100-mAs data sets were reconstructed with FBP and at 4 SAFIRE settings (S1, S2, S3, S4). Higher number of SAFIRE settings denotes increased strength of the algorithm resulting in lower image noise. Two abdominal radiologists independently compared the FBP and SAFIRE images for lesion number, location, size and conspicuity, and visibility of small structures, image noise, and diagnostic confidence. Objective noise and Hounsfield units (HU) were measured in the liver and the descending aorta. Results All 43 lesions were detected on both FBP and SAFIRE images. Minor blocky, pixelated appearance of 50% and 75% reduced dose images was noted at S3 and S4 SAFIRE but not at S1 and S2 settings. Subjective noise was suboptimal in both 50% and 75% lower-dose FBP images but was deemed acceptable on all SAFIRE settings. Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction images were deemed acceptable in all patients at 50% lower dose and in 22 of 24 patients at 75% lower dose. As compared with 75% reduced dose FBP, objective noise was lower by 22.8% (22.9/29.7), 35% (19.3/29.7), 44.3% (16.7/29.3), and 54.8% (13.4/29.7) on S1 to S4 settings, respectively (P < 0.001). Conclusions Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction–enabled reconstruction provides abdominal CT images without loss in diagnostic value at 50% reduced dose and in some patients also at 75% reduced dose.

[1]  C Ghetti,et al.  CT iterative reconstruction in image space: a phantom study. , 2012, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[2]  Xiao-Ming Zhang,et al.  CT and MR imaging patterns for pancreatic carcinoma invading the extrapancreatic neural plexus (Part II): Imaging of pancreatic carcinoma nerve invasion. , 2012, World journal of radiology.

[3]  Radiation dose reduction with application of non-linear adaptive filters for abdominal CT. , 2012, World journal of radiology.

[4]  R. Raupach,et al.  Iterative reconstruction algorithm for abdominal multidetector CT at different tube voltages: assessment of diagnostic accuracy, image quality, and radiation dose in a phantom study. , 2011, Radiology.

[5]  Jiang Hsieh,et al.  Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a pilot study. , 2011, Radiology.

[6]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Iterative reconstruction in image space (IRIS) in cardiac computed tomography: initial experience , 2011, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[7]  Jiang Hsieh,et al.  Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. , 2010, Radiology.

[8]  E. Samei,et al.  Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm--initial clinical experience. , 2010, Radiology.

[9]  Thomas L Toth,et al.  Low-dose CT of the abdomen: evaluation of image improvement with use of noise reduction filters pilot study. , 2003, Radiology.

[10]  Thomas L Toth,et al.  Can noise reduction filters improve low-radiation-dose chest CT images? Pilot study. , 2003, Radiology.

[11]  J. Valentin,et al.  Abstract: Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures, ICRP Publication 85 , 2000 .

[12]  Managing patient dose in computed tomography. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. , 2000, Annals of the ICRP.

[13]  K. Lange,et al.  EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[14]  Robert Stanton,et al.  Radiological Imaging: The Theory of Image Formation, Detection, and Processing , 1983 .

[15]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.