Task complexity and linguistic and discourse features of narrative writing performance

The research presented in this paper aimed to investigate the linguistic and discourse characteristics of narratives produced by upper-intermediate foreign language learners in a bilingual secondary school. In our analyses we used a variety of linguistic and discourse variables and a recently developed computer tool (Coh-Metrix 2.0: McNamara, Louwerse, & Graesser, 2002) to describe the characteristics of narrative texts.As a background for comparison, we also collected data from a small group of L1 writers in order to gain an insight into features of written task performance that is not hindered by difficulties in accessing linguistic knowledge required to execute a task. The variable whether students had to narrate a story with a given content or whether they were free to plan the plot of the story exerted a major impact only on one measure of lexical sophistication and had a minor effect on the overt expression of temporal cohesion. The study showed that the major difference between L1 and foreign language writers could be found with relation to lexical variety, sophistication and range.

[1]  Folkert Kuiken,et al.  Cognitive Task Complexity and Written Output in Italian and French as a Foreign Language. , 2008 .

[2]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Situation models in language comprehension and memory. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[4]  Noriko Iwashita,et al.  Can We Predict Task Difficulty in an Oral Proficiency Test? Exploring the Potential of an Information‐Processing Approach to Task Design , 2001 .

[5]  Averil Coxhead.  A New Academic Word List , 2000 .

[6]  B. Bourdin,et al.  Mode effects in a sentence production span task , 1996 .

[7]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[8]  Jennifer Yusun Kang,et al.  Written Narratives as an Index of L2 Competence in Korean EFL Learners. , 2005 .

[9]  Marilyn Newhoff,et al.  Measures of lexical diversity in aphasia , 2003 .

[10]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[11]  Peter Robinson,et al.  Cognition and Second Language Instruction: COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION , 2001 .

[12]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Predicting lexical proficiency in language learner texts using computational indices , 2011 .

[13]  Andrea Révész,et al.  TASK COMPLEXITY, FOCUS ON FORM, AND SECOND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT , 2009, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[14]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .

[15]  Christiane Fellbaum,et al.  Book Reviews: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database , 1999, CL.

[16]  Paul Meara,et al.  P-Lex: A Simple and Effective Way of Describing the lexical Characteristics of Short L2 Tests. , 2001 .

[17]  Rob Schoonen,et al.  Generalizability of writing scores: an application of structural equation modeling , 2005 .

[18]  T. Landauer,et al.  Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis , 1990 .

[19]  William Frawley,et al.  Conjunctive cohesion in four English genres , 1983 .

[20]  Max Coltheart,et al.  The MRC Psycholinguistic Database , 1981 .

[21]  Marie Tapper,et al.  Connectives in advanced Swedish EFL learners' written English - preliminary results , 2005 .

[22]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Computational assessment of lexical differences in L1 and L2 writing , 2009 .

[23]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[24]  David Malvern,et al.  Lexical Diversity and Language Development: Quantification and Assessment , 2004 .

[25]  Peter Skehan,et al.  Cognition and Second Language Instruction: Cognition and tasks , 2001 .

[26]  Peter Robinson,et al.  Cognitive Complexity and Task Sequencing: Studies in a Componential Framework for Second Language Task Design , 2005 .

[27]  Virginia Samuda,et al.  Tasks in Second Language Learning , 2007 .

[28]  Hu Zhuang-lin,et al.  Some Linguistic Differences in the Written English of Chinese and Australian Students. , 1982 .

[29]  R. T. Kellogg.  Attentional overload and writing performance: effects of rough draft and outline strategies , 1988 .

[30]  Tomohito Ishikawa,et al.  Chapter 7. The Effect of Manipulating Task Complexity Along the (± Here-and-Now) Dimension on L2 Written Narrative Discourse , 2006 .

[31]  C. Cameron,et al.  Text cohesion in children's narrative writing , 1995, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[32]  J. Norris,et al.  Towards an Organic Approach to Investigating CAF in Instructed SLA: The Case of Complexity , 2009 .

[33]  Lawrence Jun Zhang,et al.  Effects of Task Complexity on the Fluency and Lexical Complexity in EFL Students' Argumentative Writing. , 2010 .

[34]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  The psychology of written composition , 1987 .

[35]  Paul Meara,et al.  The rediscovery of vocabulary , 2002 .

[36]  Eli Hinkel,et al.  Second Language Writers' Text: Linguistic and Rhetorical Features , 2002 .

[37]  D. McCutchen.  A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition , 1996 .

[38]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Register, Genre, and Style , 2019 .

[39]  R. T. Kellogg.  Effectiveness of prewritting strategies as a function of task demands , 1990 .

[40]  G. Pallotti.  CAF: Defining, Refining and Differentiating Constructs , 2009 .

[41]  Roger Gilabert Guerrero.  Task Complexity and L2 Narrative Oral Production , 2005 .

[42]  R. T. Kellogg.  A model of working memory in writing. , 1996 .

[43]  Linda Flower,et al.  The Dynamics of Composing : Making Plans and Juggling Constraints , 1980 .

[44]  C. Michael Levy,et al.  The Science of Writing : Theories, Methods, Individual Differences and Applications , 1996 .

[45]  A. Purves,et al.  Writing Across Languages and Cultures: Issues in Contrastive Rhetoric , 1988 .

[46]  P. Robinson.  Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: exploring interactions in a componential framework , 2001 .

[47]  Scott Jarvis,et al.  Exploring multiple profiles of highly rated learner compositions , 2003 .

[48]  Tony Silva.  Toward an Understanding of the Distinct Nature of L2 Writing: The ESL Research and Its Implications , 1993 .

[49]  L. Justice,et al.  The development of expressive elaboration in fictional narratives. , 2005, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[50]  Leo G. M. Noordman,et al.  Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations , 1992 .

[51]  M. Louwerse.  An analytic and cognitve parameterization of coherence relations , 2002 .

[52]  Rosa M. Manchón.  Writing in foreign language contexts : learning, teaching, and research , 2009 .

[53]  Liz Hamp-Lyons,et al.  EXAMINING EXPERT JUDGMENTS OF TASK DIFFICULTY ON ESSAY TESTS , 1994 .

[54]  Pauline Foster,et al.  Native Speakers and Task Performance: Comparing Effects on Complexity, Fluency, and Lexical Diversity. , 2009 .

[55]  Joy Reid,et al.  A computer text analysis of four cohesion devices in english discourse by native and nonnative writers , 1992 .

[56]  Michael Halliday,et al.  Cohesion in English , 1976 .

[57]  Brian North,et al.  Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: learning, teaching, assessment , 2009 .

[58]  U. Connor.  A study of cohesion and coherence in English as a second language students’ writing , 1984 .

[59]  Scott Jarvis,et al.  vocd: A theoretical and empirical evaluation , 2007 .

[60]  Philip M. McCarthy,et al.  MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[61]  María del Pilar,et al.  Investigating tasks in formal language learning , 2007 .

[62]  Peter Skehan,et al.  Modelling Second Language Performance: Integrating Complexity, Accuracy, Fluency, and Lexis , 2009 .

[63]  R. Ellis,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF PLANNING ON FLUENCY, COMPLEXITY, AND ACCURACY IN SECOND LANGUAGE NARRATIVE WRITING , 2004, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[64]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[65]  Michael Stevenson,et al.  Towards a blueprint of the foreign language writer: the linguistic and cognitive demands of foreign language writing , 2009 .

[66]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[67]  R. T. Kellogg,et al.  Competition for working memory among writing processes. , 2001, The American journal of psychology.

[68]  Liz Murphy,et al.  Chapter 4. The Temporal Dimension and Problem-solving Nature of Foreign Language Composing Processes. Implications for Theory , 2009 .

[69]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Component processes in text comprehension and some of their interactions , 1985 .