Learning from deep learning: better cosmological parameter inference from weak lensing maps

Dark matter cannot be observed directly, but its weak gravitational lensing slightly distorts the apparent shapes of background galaxies, making weak lensing one of the most promising probes of cosmology. Several observational studies have measured the effect, and there are currently running1,2 and planned efforts3,4 to provide even larger and higher-resolution weak lensing maps. Owing to nonlinearities on small scales, the traditional analysis with two-point statistics does not fully capture all of the underlying information5. Multiple inference methods have been proposed to extract more details based on higher-order statistics6,7, peak statistics8–13, Minkowski functionals14–16 and recently convolutional neural networks17,18. Here we present an improved convolutional neural network that gives significantly better estimates of the Ωm and σ8 cosmological parameters from simulated weak lensing convergence maps than state-of-art methods and that is also free of systematic bias. We show that the network exploits information in the gradients around peaks, and with this insight we have constructed an easy-to-understand and robust peak-counting algorithm based on the steepness of peaks, instead of their heights. The proposed scheme is even more accurate than the neural network on high-resolution noiseless maps. With shape noise and lower resolution, its relative advantage deteriorates, but it remains more accurate than peak counting.A convolutional neural network estimates cosmological parameters from simulated weak lensing convergence maps in an unbiased way. The network analysis motivates a new and robust convergence peak-counting algorithm based on the steepness of peak heights.

[1]  Tony Lindeberg,et al.  Scale-Space for Discrete Signals , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[2]  Morgan May,et al.  Sample variance in weak lensing: How many simulations are required? , 2016, 1601.06792.

[3]  P. Schneider,et al.  The cosmological information of shear peaks: beyond the abundance , 2013, 1301.5001.

[4]  G. Meylan,et al.  Weak lensing mass map and peak statistics in Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Stripe 82 survey , 2013, 1311.1319.

[5]  M. May,et al.  Cosmology constraints from the weak lensing peak counts and the power spectrum in CFHTLenS data , 2014, 1412.0757.

[6]  M. White,et al.  Simulating Weak Lensing by Large-Scale Structure , 2003, astro-ph/0303555.

[7]  Joan Bruna,et al.  Intriguing properties of neural networks , 2013, ICLR.

[8]  Masahiro Takada,et al.  Three-point correlations in weak lensing surveys: Model predictions and applications , 2003, astro-ph/0304034.

[9]  Martin Kilbinger,et al.  Cosmology with cosmic shear observations: a review , 2014, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[10]  P. Schneider,et al.  KiDS-450: cosmological parameter constraints from tomographic weak gravitational lensing , 2016, 1606.05338.

[11]  H. Hoekstra,et al.  CFHTLenS: cosmological constraints from a combination of cosmic shear two-point and three-point correlations , 2014, 1404.5469.

[12]  C. B. D'Andrea,et al.  Cosmology constraints from shear peak statistics in Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data , 2016, 1603.05040.

[13]  Morgan May,et al.  Cosmology with Minkowski functionals and moments of the weak lensing convergence field , 2013, 1309.4460.

[14]  Daniel J. Hsu,et al.  Non-Gaussian information from weak lensing data via deep learning , 2018, ArXiv.

[15]  University of Cambridge,et al.  Probing Cosmology with Weak Lensing Minkowski Functionals , 2011, 1109.6334.

[16]  Naoki Yoshida,et al.  STATISTICAL AND SYSTEMATIC ERRORS IN THE MEASUREMENT OF WEAK-LENSING MINKOWSKI FUNCTIONALS: APPLICATION TO THE CANADA–FRANCE–HAWAII LENSING SURVEY , 2013, 1312.5032.

[17]  J. P. Dietrich,et al.  Cosmology with the shear-peak statistics , 2009, 0906.3512.

[18]  Daniel J. Hsu,et al.  Do dark matter halos explain lensing peaks , 2016, 1609.03973.

[19]  Lawrence G. Roberts,et al.  Machine Perception of Three-Dimensional Solids , 1963, Outstanding Dissertations in the Computer Sciences.

[20]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[21]  S. Bridle,et al.  Cosmic Discordance: Are Planck CMB and CFHTLenS weak lensing measurements out of tune? , 2014, 1408.4742.

[22]  S. Krughoff,et al.  The effective number density of galaxies for weak lensing measurements in the LSST project , 2013, 1305.0793.

[23]  Rob Fergus,et al.  Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networks , 2013, ECCV.

[24]  Morgan May,et al.  Probing cosmology with weak lensing peak counts , 2009, 0907.0486.

[25]  B. Yanny,et al.  Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing , 2017, Physical Review D.

[26]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition , 2014, ICLR.