Anticipation, teamwork and cognitive load: chasing efficiency during robot-assisted surgery

Introduction Robot-assisted surgery (RAS) has changed the traditional operating room (OR), occupying more space with equipment and isolating console surgeons away from the patients and their team. We aimed to evaluate how anticipation of surgical steps and familiarity between team members impacted efficiency. Methods We analysed recordings (video and audio) of 12 robot-assisted radical prostatectomies. Any requests between surgeon and the team members were documented and classified by personnel, equipment type, mode of communication, level of inconvenience in fulfilling the request and anticipation. Surgical team members completed questionnaires assessing team familiarity and cognitive load (National Aeronautics and Space Administration – Task Load Index). Predictors of team efficiency were assessed using Pearson correlation and stepwise linear regression. Results 1330 requests were documented, of which 413 (31%) were anticipated. Anticipation correlated negatively with operative time, resulting in overall 8% reduction of OR time. Team familiarity negatively correlated with inconveniences. Anticipation ratio, per cent of requests that were non-verbal and total request duration were significantly correlated with the console surgeons’ cognitive load (r=0.77, p=0.006; r=0.63, p=0.04; and r=0.70, p=0.02, respectively). Conclusions Anticipation and active engagement by the surgical team resulted in shorter operative time, and higher familiarity scores were associated with fewer inconveniences. Less anticipation and non-verbal requests were also associated with lower cognitive load for the console surgeon. Training efforts to increase anticipation and team familiarity can improve team efficiency during RAS.

[1]  C. MacKenzie,et al.  A laboratory study on anticipatory movement in laparoscopic surgery: a behavioral indicator for team collaboration , 2007, Surgical Endoscopy.

[2]  Elliot E. Entin,et al.  Adaptive Team Coordination , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[3]  R. Whyte,et al.  Teamwork and Communication Skills in Cardiothoracic Surgery. , 2017, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[4]  Dimitrios Stefanidis,et al.  Higher Mental Workload is Associated With Poorer Laparoscopic Performance as Measured by the NASA-TLX Tool , 2010, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[5]  J. Bramble,et al.  Team training can improve operating room performance. , 2011, Surgery.

[6]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  An introduction to human factors engineering , 1997 .

[7]  D. Eisenstein,et al.  Quality of Communication in Robotic Surgery and Surgical Outcomes , 2016, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[8]  P. Barach,et al.  A prospective study of paediatric cardiac surgical microsystems: assessing the relationships between non-routine events, teamwork and patient outcomes , 2011, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[9]  C. Morash,et al.  Peri-Operative Morbidity Associated with Radical Cystectomy in a Multicenter Database of Community and Academic Hospitals , 2014, PloS one.

[10]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[11]  Lora Cavuoto,et al.  The Loud Surgeon Behind the Console: Understanding Team Activities During Robot-Assisted Surgery. , 2016, Journal of surgical education.

[12]  Richard I. Cook,et al.  SPECIAL SECTION: Adapting to New Technology in the Operating Room , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[13]  R. Flin,et al.  Non-technical skills for surgeons in the operating room: a review of the literature. , 2006, Surgery.

[14]  Hong Lu,et al.  Job satisfaction among nurses: a literature review. , 2005, International journal of nursing studies.

[15]  W. B. Seales,et al.  Assessing Mental Workload During Laparoscopic Surgery , 2005, Surgical innovation.

[16]  K. Guru,et al.  Evaluation and Impact of Workflow Interruptions During Robot-assisted Surgery. , 2016, Urology.

[17]  R. Reznick,et al.  Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects , 2004, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[18]  Caroline G. L. Cao,et al.  Effects of New Technology on the Operating Room Team , 2004 .

[19]  Catherine Yoon,et al.  Analysis of surgical errors in closed malpractice claims at 4 liability insurers. , 2006, Surgery.

[20]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics: Salvendy/Handbook of Human Factors 4e , 2012 .

[21]  D. Moorman,et al.  Communication failure in the operating room. , 2011, Surgery.

[22]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Surgeon and Type of Anesthesia Predict Variability in Surgical Procedure Times , 2000, Anesthesiology.

[23]  Caroline G. L. Cao,et al.  Lowering Communication Barriers in Operating Room Technology , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[24]  T. Osler,et al.  Complications in surgical patients. , 2002, Archives of surgery.

[25]  M. G. Helander,et al.  Effects of New Technology on the Operating Room Team , 2004 .

[26]  Khurshid A Guru,et al.  Technical mentorship during robot‐assisted surgery: a cognitive analysis , 2016, BJU international.

[27]  S. Lipsitz,et al.  The impact of team familiarity and surgical experience on operative efficiency: a retrospective analysis , 2016, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[28]  A. Macario What does one minute of operating room time cost? , 2010, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[29]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 4th Edition , 2012 .

[30]  Joan Alviar Fraino,et al.  TeamSTEPPS: Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety , 2015 .

[31]  Bernard T. Lee,et al.  Design and impact of an intraoperative pathway: a new operating room model for team-based practice. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[32]  C. Vincent,et al.  Distracting communications in the operating theatre. , 2007, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[33]  F. Montorsi,et al.  Best practices in robot-assisted radical cystectomy and urinary reconstruction: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel. , 2015, European urology.

[34]  J Annett,et al.  A method for measuring team skills , 2000, Ergonomics.

[35]  W. Heinrichs,et al.  Three different types of surgeon-specific stress reactions identified by laparoscopic simulation in a virtual scenario , 2008, Surgical Endoscopy.

[36]  A. Park,et al.  Patients benefit while surgeons suffer: an impending epidemic. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[37]  Nick Sevdalis,et al.  The impact of stress on surgical performance: a systematic review of the literature. , 2010, Surgery.

[38]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics , 2005 .