Frictional Behavior of Large Displacement Experimental Faults

The coefficient of friction and velocity dependence of friction of initially bare surfaces and 1-mm-thick simulated fault gouges ( 400 mm at 25°C and 25 MPa normal stress. Steady state negative friction velocity dependence and a steady state fault zone microstructure are achieved after ∼18 mm displacement, and an approximately constant strength is reached after a few tens of millimeters of sliding on initially bare surfaces. Simulated fault gouges show a large but systematic variation of friction, velocity dependence of friction, dilatancy, and degree of localization with displacement. At short displacement (<10 mm), simulated gouge is strong, velocity strengthening and changes in sliding velocity are accompanied by relatively large changes in dilatancy rate. With continued displacement, simulated gouges become progressively weaker and less velocity strengthening, the velocity dependence of dilatancy rate decreases, and deformation becomes localized into a narrow basal shear which at its most localized is observed to be velocity weakening. With subsequent displacement, the fault restrengthens, returns to velocity strengthening, or to velocity neutral, the velocity dependence of dilatancy rate becomes larger, and deformation becomes distributed. Correlation of friction, velocity dependence of friction and of dilatancy rate, and degree of localization at all displacements in simulated gouge suggest that all quantities are interrelated. The observations do not distinguish the independent variables but suggest that the degree of localization is controlled by the fault strength, not by the friction velocity dependence. The friction velocity dependence and velocity dependence of dilatancy rate can be used as qualitative measures of the degree of localization in simulated gouge, in agreement with previous studies. Theory equating the friction velocity dependence of simulated gouge to the sum of the friction velocity dependence of bare surfaces and the velocity dependence of dilatancy rate of simulated gouge fails to quantitatively account for the experimental observations.

[1]  M. F. Linker,et al.  Effects of variable normal stress on rock friction: Observations and constitutive equations , 1992 .

[2]  C. Sammis,et al.  The apparent friction of granular fault gouge in sheared layers , 1994 .

[3]  B. Hobbs,et al.  Coulomb constitutive laws for friction: Contrasts in frictional behavior for distributed and localized shear , 1992 .

[4]  James H. Dieterich,et al.  The frictional properties of a simulated gouge having a fractal particle distribution , 1989 .

[5]  G. Mandl,et al.  Shear zones in granular material , 1977 .

[6]  N. Beeler,et al.  Implications of Coulomb plasticity for the velocity dependence of experimental faults , 1995 .

[7]  W. Brace,et al.  Stick-Slip as a Mechanism for Earthquakes , 1966, Science.

[8]  J. Dieterich.  Modeling of rock friction: 1. Experimental results and constitutive equations , 1979 .

[9]  J. Weeks,et al.  Roughness and wear during brittle faulting , 1988 .

[10]  T. Madden,et al.  The effect of pressure on the electrical resistivity of water‐saturated crystalline rocks , 1965 .

[11]  A. Ruina.  Slip instability and state variable friction laws , 1983 .

[12]  Arvid M. Johnson,et al.  Development of faults as zones of deformation bands and as slip surfaces in sandstone , 1978 .

[13]  A. Ruina,et al.  Stability of Steady Frictional Slipping , 1983 .

[14]  J. Weeks,et al.  Constitutive behavior and stability of frictional sliding of granite , 1986 .

[15]  Chris Marone,et al.  Frictional behavior and constitutive modeling of simulated fault gouge , 1990 .

[16]  Chris Marone,et al.  The depth of seismic faulting and the upper transition from stable to unstable slip regimes , 1988 .

[17]  C. Scholz,et al.  Correction to “On the mechanics of earthquake afterslip” by Chris J. Marone, C.H. Scholz, and Roger Bilham , 1991 .

[18]  A. Ruina,et al.  Slip motion and stability of a single degree of freedom elastic system with rate and state dependent friction , 1984 .

[19]  D. Lockner,et al.  How geometrical constraints contribute to the weakness of mature faults , 1993, Nature.

[20]  J. Byerlee,et al.  Experimental studies of compaction and dilatancy during frictional sliding on faults containing gouge , 1989 .

[21]  M. Paterson,et al.  Volume changes during the deformation of rocks at high pressures , 1972 .

[22]  D. Lockner,et al.  Effects of temperature and sliding rate on frictional strength of granite , 1986 .

[23]  A. Aydin.  Small faults formed as deformation bands in sandstone , 1978 .

[24]  A note on the rate sensitivity of frictional sliding of westerly granite , 1984 .

[25]  T. Tullis.  Rock friction constitutive behavior from laboratory experiments and its implications for an earthquake prediction field monitoring program , 1988 .

[26]  J. Dieterich.  Time-dependent friction and the mechanics of stick-slip , 1978 .

[27]  J. Byerlee,et al.  A note on the effect of fault gouge thickness on fault stability , 1976 .

[28]  James D. Byerlee,et al.  Frictional slip of granite at hydrothermal conditions , 1995 .

[29]  N. Yoshioka,et al.  Micromechanics of Rock Friction 1.Effects of Surface Roughness on Initial Friction and Slip Hardening in Westerly Granite , 1992 .

[30]  J. C. Savage,et al.  Coulomb plasticity within the fault zone , 1992 .

[31]  Brian Kilgore,et al.  Scaling of the critical slip distance for seismic faulting with shear strain in fault zones , 1993, Nature.