A generative joint model for spike trains and saccades during perceptual decision-making

Theory development in both psychology and neuroscience can benefit by consideration of both behavioral and neural data sets. However, the development of appropriate methods for linking these data sets is a difficult statistical and conceptual problem. Over the past decades, different linking approaches have been employed in the study of perceptual decision-making, beginning with rudimentary linking of the data sets at a qualitative, structural level, culminating in sophisticated statistical approaches with quantitative links. We outline a new approach, in which a single model is developed that jointly addresses neural and behavioral data. This approach allows for specification and testing of quantitative links between neural and behavioral aspects of the model. Estimating the model in a Bayesian framework allows both data sets to equally inform the estimation of all model parameters. The use of a hierarchical model architecture allows for a model, which accounts for and measures the variability between neurons. We demonstrate the approach by re-analysis of a classic data set containing behavioral recordings of decision-making with accompanying single-cell neural recordings. The joint model is able to capture most aspects of both data sets, and also supports the analysis of interesting questions about prediction, including predicting the times at which responses are made, and the corresponding neural firing rates.

[1]  R. Stein A THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF NEURONAL VARIABILITY. , 1965, Biophysical journal.

[2]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Striatum and pre-SMA facilitate decision-making under time pressure , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  Cortico-striatal connections predict control over speed and accuracy in perceptual decision making , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Timothy D. Hanks,et al.  Elapsed Decision Time Affects the Weighting of Prior Probability in a Perceptual Decision Task , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  G. Logan,et al.  Inhibitory control in mind and brain 2.0: blocked-input models of saccadic countermanding. , 2015, Psychological review.

[6]  Richard P. Heitz,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff , 2012, Neuron.

[7]  David J. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Bayesian graphical modelling: a case‐study in monitoring health outcomes , 2002 .

[8]  W. Newsome,et al.  Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  The simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  Jeffrey D. Schall,et al.  Neural basis of deciding, choosing and acting , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[11]  G. J. Tomko,et al.  Neuronal variability: non-stationary responses to identical visual stimuli. , 1974, Brain research.

[12]  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers,et al.  A diffusion model decomposition of the effects of alcohol on perceptual decision making , 2011, Psychopharmacology.

[13]  J. Gold,et al.  The neural basis of decision making. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[14]  Michael Weisberg Who is a Modeler? , 2007, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[15]  J. Movshon,et al.  The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Fractional Bayes factors for model comparison , 1995 .

[17]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[18]  J. Schall,et al.  Neural Control of Voluntary Movement Initiation , 1996, Science.

[19]  Peter Godfrey-Smith,et al.  Models and fictions in science , 2009 .

[20]  T. Zandt,et al.  A comparison of two response time models applied to perceptual matching , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  Elizabeth Irvine,et al.  Model-Based Theorizing in Cognitive Neuroscience , 2016, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[22]  P. Glimcher The neurobiology of visual-saccadic decision making. , 2003, Annual review of neuroscience.

[23]  Braden A. Purcell,et al.  From Salience to Saccades: Multiple-Alternative Gated Stochastic Accumulator Model of Visual Search , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  Domain General Mechanisms of Perceptual Decision Making in Human Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Wasserman,et al.  Bayesian Model Selection and Model Averaging. , 2000, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[26]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  Discriminating evidence accumulation from urgency signals in speeded decision making. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. , 2001, Psychological review.

[28]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Decision Making as a Window on Cognition , 2013, Neuron.

[29]  Kelvin E. Jones,et al.  Neuronal variability: noise or part of the signal? , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[30]  Sumio Watanabe,et al.  Asymptotic Equivalence of Bayes Cross Validation and Widely Applicable Information Criterion in Singular Learning Theory , 2010, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[31]  M. Shadlen,et al.  The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[32]  Brandon M. Turner,et al.  A method for efficiently sampling from distributions with correlated dimensions. , 2013, Psychological methods.

[33]  Jonathan Weinberg,et al.  Bayesian Forecasting of an Inhomogeneous Poisson Process With Applications to Call Center Data , 2007 .

[34]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Response of Neurons in the Lateral Intraparietal Area during a Combined Visual Discrimination Reaction Time Task , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  Richard P. Heitz,et al.  Neurally constrained modeling of perceptual decision making. , 2010, Psychological review.

[36]  Anthony M. Norcia,et al.  Why more is better: Simultaneous modeling of EEG, fMRI, and behavioral data , 2016, NeuroImage.

[37]  A. Alexandrova The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science , 1965, Nature.

[38]  G. Logan,et al.  Inhibitory control in mind and brain: an interactive race model of countermanding saccades. , 2007, Psychological review.

[39]  Colm G. Connolly,et al.  Functional connectivity of negative emotional processing in adolescent depression. , 2014, Journal of affective disorders.

[40]  Andrew Heathcote,et al.  Brain and Behavior in Decision-Making , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[41]  Richard P. Heitz,et al.  Neural chronometry and coherency across speed–accuracy demands reveal lack of homomorphism between computational and neural mechanisms of evidence accumulation , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Neural correlates of a decision in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of the macaque , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[43]  Birte U. Forstmann,et al.  A Bayesian framework for simultaneously modeling neural and behavioral data , 2013, NeuroImage.

[44]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions , 1998 .

[45]  J. Schall Neural correlates of decision processes: neural and mental chronometry , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[46]  B. Forstmann,et al.  Perceptual decision neurosciences – A model-based review , 2014, Neuroscience.

[47]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Diffusion model for one-choice reaction-time tasks and the cognitive effects of sleep deprivation , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.