Engineering Education for Generation Z.

Generation Z is gaining popularity as the name used to refer to those born beginning in the mid to late 1990s. This is the generation that follows the Millennials, and they are just starting to arrive on college campuses. Much attention has been paid to Millennials and their impact on society, and because of this Generation Z members are often lumped together with this older cohort. But Generation Z students are unique, and universities and colleges must prepare to meet the challenges of instructing this new generation. Engineering educators in particular are being challenged to adapt to the speed of technological change. Faculty must consider how to adjust to this new environment, including the changing needs and expectations of Generation Z students. This paper explores these topics. The first section will explore the concept of a generation and describe some of the attributes associated with Generation Z. The second section will review the development of engineering education in the United States and some of the major reforms that have occurred in the past 100 years. The last section will discuss potential changes in the classroom to try and address some of the characteristics of Generation Z students.

[1]  M. Prensky.  Do They Really Think Differently , 2001 .

[2]  Meghan Grace,et al.  Generation Z Goes to College , 2015 .

[3]  D. Rentner,et al.  Ten Big Effects of the No Child Left behind Act on Public Schools , 2006 .

[4]  C. Evans.  Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education , 2013 .

[5]  Richard M. Felder,et al.  Creativity in Engineering Education. , 1988 .

[6]  L.J. Leifer,et al.  Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[7]  Thomas D. Snyder,et al.  Digest of Education Statistics , 1994 .

[8]  T. S. Reynolds.  The Education of Engineers in America before the Morrill Act of 1862 , 1992, History of Education Quarterly.

[9]  Glenn W. Ellis,et al.  Using Concept Maps to Enhance Understanding in Engineering Education , 2004 .

[10]  Michelle K. Smith,et al.  Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  P. Zimbardo,et al.  Transformational Teaching: Theoretical Underpinnings, Basic Principles, and Core Methods , 2012, Educational Psychology Review.

[12]  Marvin Lazerson,et al.  Vocationalism in Higher Education: The Triumph of the Education Gospel , 2005 .

[13]  Kristina Edström,et al.  PBL and CDIO: complementary models for engineering education development , 2014 .

[14]  Penny Thompson,et al.  The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[15]  Heng Ngee Mok.  Teaching Tip: The Flipped Classroom , 2014, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[16]  Kristina Edström,et al.  Rethinking engineering education - The CDIO approach, 2nd ed , 2014 .

[17]  Lynne C. Lancaster,et al.  When generations collide : who they are, why they clash, how to solve the generational puzzle at work , 2002 .

[18]  Sarah Spence Adams,et al.  The Olin curriculum: thinking toward the future , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[19]  Daniel L. Thomas,et al.  Linking Freshmen and Senior Engineering Design Teams: Engaging Early Academic Career Students in Engineering Design , 2014 .

[20]  Donald R. Woods,et al.  An Evidence‐Based Strategy for Problem Solving , 2000 .

[21]  J. Hattie,et al.  The Power of Feedback , 2007 .

[22]  B. Turner,et al.  Outline of a Theory of Generations , 1998 .

[23]  W. K. Campbell,et al.  Generational Differences Are Real and Useful , 2015, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[24]  B. Seely,et al.  Striving for Balance: A Hundred Years of the American Society for Engineering Education , 1993 .

[25]  Jeffrey E. Froyd,et al.  Five Major Shifts in 100 Years of Engineering Education , 2012, Proceedings of the IEEE.