Identifying Sources of Heterogeneity for Empirically Deriving Strategic Types: A Constrained Finite-Mixture Structural-Equation Methodology

The resource-based view (RBV) of the firm suggests that strategic deployment of capabilities allows strategic business units (SBUs) to exploit distinctive competencies and create sustainable competitive advantage. Following the RBV, we propose a new predictive methodology for deriving typologies of SBUs that accommodates heterogeneity among SBUs with respect to their strategic capabilities, how effectively they are employed, and performance. Statistically, we devise a constrained finite-mixture structural-equation procedure that simultaneously accounts for firm capabilities, performance outcomes, and the relationships between them. The procedure allows for a comprehensive modeling and grouping of entities, and simultaneously provides a diagnosis of the sources of heterogeneity via the flexibility of estimating a series of nested models. Managerially, our proposed methodology is grounded in the strategic type and RBV literature and can capture the effects of environmental and industry-specific factors. Using data obtained from 216 SBUs in the United States for illustration, the results show that our derived four mixed-type solution dominates the four-group, Prospectors-Analyzers-Defenders-Reactors classification as well as a number of other nested model solutions in terms of objective statistical fit criteria for this data set, suggesting a more contingency-driven strategic stance adopted by these SBUs. We conclude with a discussion of the theoretical and managerial benefits of an improved methodology for empirically deriving strategic typologies.

[1]  J. Barney Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy , 1986 .

[2]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[3]  G. Day The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations , 1994 .

[4]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[5]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[6]  S. Hunt,et al.  The Comparative Advantage Theory of Competition , 1995 .

[7]  W. DeSarbo,et al.  Revisiting the Miles and Snow Strategic Framework: Uncovering Interrelationships between Strategic Types, Capabilities, Environmental Uncertainty, and Firm Performance , 2005 .

[8]  Sundar G. Bharadwaj,et al.  Information Technology Effects on Firm Performance as Measured by Tobin's q , 1999 .

[9]  Orville C. Walker,et al.  Marketing Strategy - Planning and Implementation , 1995 .

[10]  J. Hauser,et al.  Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of the literature , 1996 .

[11]  D. Dillman Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method , 1979 .

[12]  Margaret A. Peteraf The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[13]  Igor H.Ansoff Strategic Management , 1979 .

[14]  James W. Kolari,et al.  Marketing Strategy Implications of the Miles and Snow Strategic Typology , 1987 .

[15]  S. Shortell,et al.  Perceptual and archival measures of Miles and Snow's strategic types: a comprehensive assessment of reliability and validity. , 1990, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[16]  George S. Day,et al.  Assessing Advantage: A Framework for Diagnosing Competitive Superiority , 1988 .

[17]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[18]  George S. Day,et al.  Market Driven Strategy: Processes for Creating Value , 1990 .

[19]  D. Hambrick Some tests of the effectiveness and functional attributes of Miles and Snow's strategic types. , 1983, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[20]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[21]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[22]  Gilbert A. Churchill A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[23]  Donald C. Hambrick,et al.  Taxonomic Approaches to Studying Strategy: Some Conceptual and Methodological Issues , 1984 .

[24]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[25]  M. Wedel,et al.  Market Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations , 1997 .

[26]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[27]  W. DeSarbo,et al.  Finite-Mixture Structural Equation Models for Response-Based Segmentation and Unobserved Heterogeneity , 1997 .

[28]  Hamparsum Bozdogan,et al.  Mixture-Model Cluster Analysis Using Model Selection Criteria and a New Informational Measure of Complexity , 1994 .

[29]  Christian Hennig,et al.  Identifiablity of Models for Clusterwise Linear Regression , 2000, J. Classif..

[30]  S. Dibb Market Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations (2nd edition) , 2000 .

[31]  D. Hambrick On the staying power of defenders, analyzers, and prospectors , 2003 .

[32]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences , 1993 .

[33]  Rick L. Andrews,et al.  Retention of latent segments in regression-based marketing models , 2003 .

[34]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[35]  J. Barney,et al.  Competitive Organizational Behavior: Toward an Organizationally‐Based Theory of Competitive Advantage , 1994 .

[36]  P. Varadarajan,et al.  Strategic types, distinctive marketing competencies and organizational performance: A multiple measures‐based study , 1990 .

[37]  M. Hitt,et al.  Corporate distinctive competence, strategy, industry and performance , 1985 .