Quantitative imaging of chromatin decompaction in living cells

Chromatin organization is highly dynamic and regulates transcription. Upon transcriptional activation, chromatin is remodeled and referred to as “open,” but quantitative and dynamic data of this decompaction process are lacking. Here, we have developed a quantitative high resolution–microscopy assay in living yeast cells to visualize and quantify chromatin dynamics using the GAL7-10-1 locus as a model system. Upon transcriptional activation of these three clustered genes, we detect an increase of the mean distance across this locus by >100 nm. This decompaction is linked to active transcription but is not sensitive to the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A or to deletion of the histone acetyl transferase Gcn5. In contrast, the deletion of SNF2 (encoding the ATPase of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex) or the deactivation of the histone chaperone complex FACT lead to a strongly reduced decompaction without significant effects on transcriptional induction in FACT mutants. Our findings are consistent with nucleosome remodeling and eviction activities being major contributors to chromatin reorganization during transcription but also suggest that transcription can occur in the absence of detectable decompaction.

[1]  H. Zachau,et al.  Deoxyribonuclease II as a probe for chromatin structure. I. Location of cleavage sites. , 1980, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  M. Green,et al.  SAGA is an essential in vivo target of the yeast acidic activator Gal4p. , 2001, Genes & development.

[3]  Ben M. Webb,et al.  Putting the Pieces Together: Integrative Modeling Platform Software for Structure Determination of Macromolecular Assemblies , 2012, PLoS biology.

[4]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[5]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Mapping Nucleosome Resolution Chromosome Folding in Yeast by Micro-C , 2015, Cell.

[6]  G van den Engh,et al.  Estimating genomic distance from DNA sequence location in cell nuclei by a random walk model. , 1992, Science.

[7]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  In Vivo HP1 Targeting Causes Large-Scale Chromatin Condensation and Enhanced Histone Lysine Methylation , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[8]  Kevin Struhl,et al.  Asf1 mediates histone eviction and deposition during elongation by RNA polymerase II. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[9]  Christophe Zimmer,et al.  Inferring the physical properties of yeast chromatin through Bayesian analysis of whole nucleus simulations , 2017, Genome Biology.

[10]  M. Pazin,et al.  Histone H4-K16 Acetylation Controls Chromatin Structure and Protein Interactions , 2006, Science.

[11]  Michael Grunstein,et al.  Global histone acetylation and deacetylation in yeast , 2000, Nature.

[12]  Sander K. Govers,et al.  Different Levels of Catabolite Repression Optimize Growth in Stable and Variable Environments , 2014, PLoS biology.

[13]  S. Knapp,et al.  Targeting bromodomains: epigenetic readers of lysine acetylation , 2014, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[14]  D. Bazett-Jones,et al.  Coming to terms with chromatin structure , 2015, Chromosoma.

[15]  Ugljesa Djuric,et al.  Open and closed domains in the mouse genome are configured as 10‐nm chromatin fibres , 2012, EMBO reports.

[16]  M. Ptashne,et al.  Independent recruitment in vivo by Gal4 of two complexes required for transcription. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[17]  T. Hothorn,et al.  Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models , 2008, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[18]  M. Buck,et al.  Chromatin accessibility: a window into the genome , 2014, Epigenetics & Chromatin.

[19]  Frank Alber,et al.  Global reorganization of budding yeast chromosome conformation in different physiological conditions , 2016, The Journal of cell biology.

[20]  A. Traven,et al.  Yeast Gal4: a transcriptional paradigm revisited , 2006, EMBO reports.

[21]  J. Boeke,et al.  Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: A useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR‐mediated gene disruption and other applications , 1998, Yeast.

[22]  W. E. Moerner,et al.  Correlations of three-dimensional motion of chromosomal loci in yeast revealed by the double-helix point spread function microscope , 2014, Molecular biology of the cell.

[23]  T. Lenstra,et al.  Single-Molecule Imaging Reveals a Switch between Spurious and Functional ncRNA Transcription. , 2015, Molecular cell.

[24]  M. Rosbash,et al.  3′‐end formation signals modulate the association of genes with the nuclear periphery as well as mRNP dot formation , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[25]  K. Weis,et al.  A negative feedback loop at the nuclear periphery regulates GAL gene expression , 2012, Molecular biology of the cell.

[26]  L. Gaudreau,et al.  Targeting of Swi/Snf to the yeast GAL1 UASG requires the Mediator, TAFIIs, and RNA polymerase II , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[27]  W. Bickmore,et al.  H4K16 acetylation marks active genes and enhancers of embryonic stem cells, but does not alter chromatin compaction , 2013, Genome research.

[28]  J. Workman,et al.  Histone exchange, chromatin structure and the regulation of transcription , 2015, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[29]  Angus I. Lamond,et al.  Quantitative analysis of chromatin compaction in living cells using FLIM–FRET , 2009, The Journal of cell biology.

[30]  J. Lieb,et al.  Evidence for nucleosome depletion at active regulatory regions genome-wide , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[31]  Baohui Chen,et al.  Imaging genomic elements in living cells using CRISPR/Cas9. , 2014, Methods in enzymology.

[32]  Wendy A Bickmore,et al.  Nuclear reorganisation and chromatin decondensation are conserved, but distinct, mechanisms linked to Hox gene activation , 2007, Development.

[33]  Antoine M. van Oijen,et al.  Diatrack particle tracking software: Review of applications and performance evaluation , 2017, Traffic.

[34]  K. Struhl,et al.  The Swi/Snf Complex Is Important for Histone Eviction during Transcriptional Activation and RNA Polymerase II Elongation In Vivo , 2007, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[35]  Kevin Struhl,et al.  Evidence for Eviction and Rapid Deposition of Histones upon Transcriptional Elongation by RNA Polymerase II , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[36]  R Ohba,et al.  Yeast Gcn5 functions in two multisubunit complexes to acetylate nucleosomal histones: characterization of an Ada complex and the SAGA (Spt/Ada) complex. , 1997, Genes & development.

[37]  Michael Grunstein,et al.  Requirement of Hos2 Histone Deacetylase for Gene Activity in Yeast , 2002, Science.

[38]  A. Pombo,et al.  Three-dimensional genome architecture: players and mechanisms , 2015, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[39]  F. Winston,et al.  The S. cerevisiae SAGA complex functions in vivo as a coactivator for transcriptional activation by Gal4. , 2001, Genes & development.

[40]  G. Sudlow,et al.  Large-Scale Chromatin Unfolding and Remodeling Induced by VP16 Acidic Activation Domain , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[41]  J. Workman,et al.  Gal80 Confers Specificity on HAT Complex Interactions with Activators* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[42]  D. Picard,et al.  Fusion of GAL4-VP16 to a steroid-binding domain provides a tool for gratuitous induction of galactose-responsive genes in yeast. , 1993, Gene.

[43]  Sébastien Phan,et al.  ChromEMT: Visualizing 3D chromatin structure and compaction in interphase and mitotic cells , 2017, Science.

[44]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[45]  D. Stillman,et al.  yFACT induces global accessibility of nucleosomal DNA without H2A-H2B displacement. , 2009, Molecular cell.

[46]  P. Vallotton,et al.  ATPase activity of the DEAD-box protein Dhh1 controls processing body formation , 2016, eLife.

[47]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. , 1999, Science.

[48]  Gabriele Müller,et al.  Trichostatin A-induced histone acetylation causes decondensation of interphase chromatin , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[49]  A. Belmont,et al.  Large-scale chromatin structure of inducible genes: transcription on a condensed, linear template , 2009, The Journal of cell biology.

[50]  Bing Li,et al.  The Role of Chromatin during Transcription , 2007, Cell.

[51]  Shaojie Zhang,et al.  Multiplexed labeling of genomic loci with dCas9 and engineered sgRNAs using CRISPRainbow , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.

[52]  P. Philippsen,et al.  Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR‐based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1998, Yeast.

[53]  Wendy A Bickmore,et al.  Nuclear re-organisation of the Hoxb complex during mouse embryonic development , 2005, Development.

[54]  W. Bickmore,et al.  Histone acetylation and the maintenance of chromatin compaction by Polycomb repressive complexes. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[55]  Andrej J. Savol,et al.  Mutation of a nucleosome compaction region disrupts Polycomb-mediated axial patterning , 2017, Science.

[56]  Huimin Zhao,et al.  CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-in of an optimized TetO repeat for live cell imaging of endogenous loci , 2017, bioRxiv.

[57]  R. Morse,et al.  GCN5 Dependence of Chromatin Remodeling and Transcriptional Activation by the GAL4 and VP16 Activation Domains in Budding Yeast , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[58]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Gcn5 promotes acetylation, eviction, and methylation of nucleosomes in transcribed coding regions. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[59]  W. Bickmore,et al.  Chromatin decondensation and nuclear reorganization of the HoxB locus upon induction of transcription. , 2004, Genes & development.

[60]  O. Ozier-Kalogeropoulos,et al.  A simple and efficient method for direct gene deletion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1993, Nucleic acids research.

[61]  Frederick S. Vizeacoumar,et al.  Systematic exploration of essential yeast gene function with temperature-sensitive mutants , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[62]  Uttam Surana,et al.  Budding yeast chromatin is dispersed in a crowded nucleoplasm in vivo , 2016, bioRxiv.

[63]  Andrew W. Murray,et al.  GFP tagging of budding yeast chromosomes reveals that protein–protein interactions can mediate sister chromatid cohesion , 1996, Current Biology.

[64]  A. Belmont,et al.  Differential large-scale chromatin compaction and intranuclear positioning of transcribed versus non-transcribed transgene arrays containing β-globin regulatory sequences , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[65]  F. Alber,et al.  Physical tethering and volume exclusion determine higher-order genome organization in budding yeast , 2012, Genome research.

[66]  C. Peterson,et al.  Dominant Role for Signal Transduction in the Transcriptional Memory of Yeast GAL Genes , 2010, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[67]  Giacomo Cavalli,et al.  Organization and function of the 3D genome , 2016, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[68]  X. Wang,et al.  Activator Control of Nucleosome Occupancy in Activation and Repression of Transcription , 2008, PLoS biology.

[69]  Petar N Petrov,et al.  Observation of live chromatin dynamics in cells via 3D localization microscopy using Tetrapod point spread functions. , 2017, Biomedical optics express.

[70]  Robert S Illingworth,et al.  Spatial genome organization: contrasting views from chromosome conformation capture and fluorescence in situ hybridization , 2014, Genes & development.