Carbon balance in the life cycle of wood: targeting a timber check dam

Focusing on a timber check dam, this study evaluated the carbon balance in the life cycle of wood, taking into account both carbon emissions and reductions associated with fossil fuel use and carbon stocks in wood and forests. A significant difference can occur because the net carbon balance may be either on the emission side or on the reduction side, depending on the implementation of reforestation after harvesting, the use of forest-residue- and sawmill-residue-based energy, and the difference in the evaluation period. Thus, it is necessary to examine which framework should be used to conduct an evaluation. Post-harvesting reforestation is essential to achieve net carbon emission reduction effects by substituting the concrete check dam with the timber check dam. Then, with the energy use of forest and sawmill residues, the net carbon emission reduction effects per dam can be expected after an evaluation period of 35 years, and 28 t-C/dam of those can be obtained during an evaluation period of 100 years. From mid- to long-term perspectives, carbon emission will be reduced more if the carbon balance of wood and forests is taken into account rather than focusing only on fossil fuel consumption.

[1]  Bjart Holtsmark Quantifying the global warming potential of CO2 emissions from wood fuels , 2015 .

[2]  K. Hanaki,et al.  Effect of Change of Forest Carbon Storage on Net Carbon Dioxide Balance of Wood Use for Energy in Japan , 2011 .

[3]  S. Hashimoto,et al.  Reductions in greenhouse gas emissions by using wood to protect against soil liquefaction , 2011, Journal of Wood Science.

[4]  Nobuaki Hattori,et al.  Case Study of Life Cycle Assessment of Domestic Logs , 2013 .

[5]  B. Solberg,et al.  Environmental and economic impacts of substitution between wood products and alternative materials: a review of micro-level analyses from Norway and Sweden , 2005 .

[6]  Yoshiharu Ishikawa,et al.  Evaluating method of durability of small wooden crib dams with considering the deterioration rate , 2007 .

[7]  Annie Levasseur,et al.  Key issues and options in accounting for carbon sequestration and temporary storage in life cycle assessment and carbon footprinting , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[8]  Laurence R. Costello,et al.  DETECTION OF WOOD DECAY IN BLUE GUM AND ELM: AN EVALUATION OF THE RESISTOGRAPH® AND THE PORTABLE DRILL , 1999 .

[9]  Chihiro Kayo,et al.  Evaluation of CO2 emissions reductions by timber check dams and their economic effectiveness , 2014, Journal of Wood Science.

[10]  Joost G. Vogtländer,et al.  Carbon sequestration in LCA, a proposal for a new approach based on the global carbon cycle; cases on wood and on bamboo , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[11]  Xavier Gabarrell,et al.  Assessing the global warming potential of wooden products from the furniture sector to improve their ecodesign. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[12]  Kiyoshi Dowaki,et al.  A Life Cycle Analysis on a Bio-DME production system considering the species of biomass feedstock in Japan and Papua New Guinea , 2010 .

[13]  Yuichi Moriguchi,et al.  Paper and Paperboard Demand and Associated Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Asia Through 2050 , 2012 .

[14]  Linda S. Heath,et al.  The greenhouse gas and energy impacts of using wood instead of alternatives in residential construction in the United States , 2008 .

[15]  C. Hennig,et al.  Bioenergy production and use: Comparative analysis of the economic and environmental effects , 2012 .

[16]  Richard J. Murphy,et al.  Energy and greenhouse gas balance of the use of forest residues for bioenergy production in the UK. , 2011 .

[17]  Tim Grant,et al.  Quantifying the greenhouse benefits of the use of wood products in two popular house designs in Sydney, Australia , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.