Design, installation, and performance evaluation of a custom dye matrix standard for automated capillary electrophoresis

CE equipment detects and deconvolutes mixtures containing up to six fluorescently labeled DNA fragments. This deconvolution is done by the collection software that requires a spectral calibration file. The calibration file is used to adjust for the overlap that occurs between the emission spectra of fluorescence dyes. All commercial genotyping and sequencing kits require the installation of a corresponding matrix standard to generate a calibration file. Due to the differences in emission spectrum overlap between fluorescent dyes, the application of existing commercial matrix standards to the electrophoretic separation of DNA labeled with other fluorescent dyes can yield undesirable results. Currently, the number of fluorescent dyes available for oligonucleotide labeling surpasses the availability of commercial matrix standards. Therefore, in this study we developed and evaluated a customized matrix standard using ATTO 633, ATTO 565, ATTO 550, ATTO Rho6G, and 6‐FAM dyes for which no commercial matrix standard is available. We highlighted the potential genotyping errors of using an incorrect matrix standard by evaluating the relative performance of our custom dye set using six matrix standards. The specific performance of two genotyping kits (UniQTyper™ Y‐10 version 1.0 and PowerPlex® Y23 System) was also evaluated using their specific matrix standards. The procedure we followed for the construction of our custom dye matrix standard can be extended to other fluorescent dyes.

[1]  Peter Dalgaard,et al.  R Development Core Team (2010): R: A language and environment for statistical computing , 2010 .

[2]  B. Karger,et al.  DNA sequencing by CE , 2009, Electrophoresis.

[3]  John M. Butler,et al.  Forensic DNA Typing: Biology, Technology, and Genetics of STR Markers , 2001 .

[4]  B. Budowle,et al.  Developmental validation of short tandem repeat reagent kit for forensic DNA profiling of canine biological material. , 2009, Croatian medical journal.

[5]  R. J. Mitchell,et al.  Forensic trace DNA: a review , 2010, Investigative Genetics.

[6]  Martin G. Ensenberger,et al.  Developmental validation of the PowerPlex(®) 21 System. , 2014, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[7]  C. Gehrig,et al.  Capillary electrophoresis in clinical and forensic analysis: Recent advances and breakthrough to routine applications , 1999, Electrophoresis.

[8]  Dennis Y. Wang,et al.  Developmental validation of the GlobalFiler(®) Express PCR Amplification Kit: A 6-dye multiplex assay for the direct amplification of reference samples. , 2015, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[9]  P. Ristow,et al.  GlobalFiler(®) Express DNA amplification kit in South Africa: Extracting the past from the present. , 2016, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[10]  A. Syvänen.  From gels to chips: “Minisequencing” primer extension for analysis of point mutations and single nucleotide polymorphisms , 1999, Human mutation.

[11]  M. D’Amato,et al.  Forensic performance of Investigator DIPplex indels genotyping kit in native, immigrant, and admixed populations in South Africa , 2015, Electrophoresis.

[12]  W. E. Frank,et al.  A global analysis of Y-chromosomal haplotype diversity for 23 STR loci , 2014, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[13]  V. Bajic,et al.  Design and validation of a highly discriminatory 10-locus Y-chromosome STR multiplex system. , 2011, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[14]  M. Kayser,et al.  A novel multiplex assay for simultaneously analysing 13 rapidly mutating Y-STRs. , 2015, Forensic science international. Genetics.