Contrast effects on stop consonant identification.

Changes in the identification of speech sounds following selective adaptation are usually attributed to a reduction in sensitivity of auditory feature detectors. An alternative explanation of these effects is based on the notion of response contrast. In several experiments, subjects identified the initial segment of synthetic consonant-vowel syllables as either the voiced stop [b] or the voiceless stop [ph]. Each test syllable had a value of voice onset time (VOT) that placed it near the English voiced-voiceless boundary. When the test syllables were preceded by a single clear [b] (VOT = -100 msec), subjects tended to identify them as [ph], whereas when they were preceded by an unambiguous [ph] (VOT = 100 msec), the syllables were predominantly labeled [b]. This contrast effect occurred even when the contextual stimuli were velar and the test stimuli were bilabial, which suggests a featural rather than a phonemic basis for the effect. To discount the possibility that these might be instances of single-trial sensory adaptation, we conducted a similar experiment in which the contextual stimuli followed the test items. Reliable contrast effects were still obtained. In view of these results, it appears likely that response contrast accounts for at least some component of the adaptation effects reported in the literature.

[1]  J. L. Miller Properties of feature detectors for VOT: the voiceless channel of analysis. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Sheila E. Blumstein,et al.  A “labial” feature analyzer in speech perception , 1974 .

[3]  J H Abbs,et al.  Neurophysiological feature detectors and speech perception: a discussion of theoretical implications. , 1971, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[4]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  chapter 6 – Speech Perception in Early Infancy1 , 1975 .

[5]  William E. Cooper,et al.  Contingent feature analysis in speech perception , 1974 .

[6]  Randy L. Diehl,et al.  Feature analyzers for the phonetic dimensionstop vs. continuant , 1976 .

[7]  Randy L. Diehl,et al.  The effect of selective adaptation on the identification of speech sounds , 1975 .

[8]  W. Ganong Amplitude contingent selective adaptation to speech , 1976 .

[9]  Category Boundaries for Speech and Nonspeech Sounds , 1974 .

[10]  W. Cooper,et al.  Adaptation of phonetic feature analyzers for place of articulation. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  G. A. Miller The Perception of Speech. , 1951 .

[12]  R. Cole,et al.  Perception of voicing in English affricates and fricatives. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  M. P. Friedman,et al.  HANDBOOK OF PERCEPTION , 1977 .

[14]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  The Relation between Identification and Discrimination along Speech and Non-Speech Continua , 1963 .

[15]  Ronald A. Cole,et al.  Perceptual Analysis of Stop Consonants and Glides. , 1976 .

[16]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors , 1973 .

[17]  H. Helson,et al.  Adaptation-level theory , 1964 .

[18]  Peter D. Eimas,et al.  Effects of Selective Adaptation on the Perception of Speech and Visual Patterns: Evidence for Feature Detectors , 1978 .