A framework to reduce product environmental impact through design optimization for additive manufacturing

Abstract Additive Manufacturing (AM) also known as 3D printing technology has drawn increasing attention from the industrial world. It provides the capability of freeform fabrication to achieve high complexity as well as significant reduction of a supply chain which further enhances the profit margin for manufacturers. However, while claiming on the advantage on the environmental aspect, there is very limited research on the environmental impact of AM technologies. Most of existing environmental assessment models for AM processes are developed based on a general Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) framework. Due to the limited scope and boundary of these models, design results are usually taken as the input. These existing models may work well for traditional manufacturing processes. However, when it comes to AM process, these methods are no longer valid, since the design freedoms which may have a great impact on sustainability are always neglected. To deal with this issue, a general framework which can integrate a design stage in LCA for minimizing the product environmental impact of AM process in particular for binder-jetting process is proposed. The detailed description of each major stage of the proposed framework is presented. This framework has been applied to evaluate the environmental impact of fabricating an engine bracket by binder-jetting process. In this case study, a comparison of environmental impact between CNC and binder-jetting fabrication process is made. The result shows that binder-jetting consumes significantly less energy and produce less CO 2 to produce a topologically optimized part than CNC milling for the same product. This case study demonstrates a key role of design optimization in the proposed framework. This proposed framework can be further modified for other typical AM process in the future.

[1]  Pascal Mognol,et al.  Sustainable manufacturing: evaluation and modeling of environmental impacts in additive manufacturing , 2013, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[2]  Sung-Hoon Ahn,et al.  A comparison of energy consumption in bulk forming, subtractive, and additive processes: Review and case study , 2014 .

[3]  Wim Dewulf,et al.  Methodology for systematic analysis and improvement of manufacturing unit process life cycle inventory (UPLCI) Part 1: Methodology Description , 2011 .

[4]  David L. Bourell,et al.  Sustainability issues in laser-based additive manufacturing , 2010 .

[5]  D W Pennington,et al.  Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications , 2004 .

[6]  Yaoyao Fiona Zhao,et al.  A survey of the design methods for additive manufacturing to improve functional performance , 2016 .

[7]  Mahesh Mani,et al.  Sustainability Characterization for Additive Manufacturing , 2014, Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

[8]  Tzu Liang Tseng,et al.  Characterization of closed-loop measurement accuracy in precision CNC milling , 2006 .

[9]  Nicolas Perry,et al.  Energy consumption model of Binder-jetting additive manufacturing processes , 2015 .

[10]  Liang Hou,et al.  Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: a literature review , 2013 .

[11]  Ratnadeep Paul,et al.  Process energy analysis and optimization in selective laser sintering , 2012 .

[12]  Jeremy Faludi,et al.  Comparing Environmental Impacts of Additive Manufacturing vs. Traditional Machining via Life-Cycle Assessment , 2015 .

[13]  Yaoyao Fiona Zhao,et al.  Energy and Material Flow Analysis of Binder-jetting Additive Manufacturing Processes , 2014 .

[14]  Yaoyao Fiona Zhao,et al.  Design Method for Lattice-Skin Structure Fabricated by Additive Manufacturing , 2014 .

[15]  David Cebon,et al.  Materials Selection in Mechanical Design , 1992 .

[16]  Richard J. Mayer,et al.  Information Integration for Concurrent Engineering (IICE) Compendium of Methods Report , 1995 .

[17]  R. Crawford,et al.  Solid Freeform Fabrication: A New Direction in Manufacturing , 1997 .

[18]  C. Slama,et al.  Aging of the Inconel 718 alloy between 500 and 750 °C , 1997 .

[19]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Methodology for systematic analysis and improvement of manufacturing unit process life-cycle inventory (UPLCI)—CO2PE! initiative (cooperative effort on process emissions in manufacturing). Part 1: Methodology description , 2011, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[20]  David L. Bourell,et al.  Sustainability of additive manufacturing: measuring the energy consumption of the laser sintering process , 2011 .

[21]  Steven J. Skerlos,et al.  Environmental aspects of laser-based and conventional tool and die manufacturing , 2007 .