The changing career trajectories of new parents in STEM

Significance Why are women still underrepresented in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) jobs? Social processes beyond individual preferences may shape the STEM employment trajectories of new mothers and new fathers differently. Using representative US longitudinal survey data, we followed full-time STEM professionals after the birth or adoption of their first child. We found substantial attrition of new parents; nearly one-half of new mothers and nearly one-quarter of new fathers leave full-time STEM employment after having children. Thus, parenthood is an important driver of gender imbalance in STEM employment, and both mothers and fathers appear to encounter difficulties reconciling caregiving with STEM careers. These findings have implications for the vitality of the US science and engineering workforce. The gender imbalance in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields has remained constant for decades and increases the farther up the STEM career pipeline one looks. Why does the underrepresentation of women endure? This study investigated the role of parenthood as a mechanism of gender-differentiated attrition from STEM employment. Using a nationally representative 8-year longitudinal sample of US STEM professionals, we examined the career trajectories of new parents after the birth or adoption of their first child. We found substantial attrition of new mothers: 43% of women leave full-time STEM employment after their first child. New mothers are more likely than new fathers to leave STEM, to switch to part-time work, and to exit the labor force. These gender differences hold irrespective of variation by discipline, race, and other demographic factors. However, parenthood is not just a “mother’s problem”; 23% of new fathers also leave STEM after their first child. Suggesting the difficulty of combining STEM work with caregiving responsibilities generally, new parents are more likely to leave full-time STEM jobs than otherwise similar childless peers and even new parents who remain employed full time are more likely than their childless peers to exit STEM for work elsewhere. These results have implications for policymakers and STEM workforce scholars; whereas parenthood is an important mechanism of women’s attrition, both women and men leave at surprisingly high rates after having children. Given that most people become parents during their working lives, STEM fields must do more to retain professionals with children.

[1]  E. Cech,et al.  Demands and Devotion: Cultural Meanings of Work and Overload Among Women Researchers and Professionals in Science and Technology Industries , 2017 .

[2]  Michelle J. Budig,et al.  Differences in Disadvantage , 2010 .

[3]  D. Johnson,et al.  A difference. , 1990, Advancing clinical care : official journal of NOAADN.

[4]  Lawrence F. Katz,et al.  Dynamics of the Gender Gap for Young Professionals in the Financial and Corporate Sectors , 2010 .

[5]  Kathleen Gerson,et al.  The Unfinished Revolution: How a New Generation is Reshaping Family, Work, and Gender in America , 2009 .

[6]  Nonstandard Work Arrangements among Women and Men Scientists and Engineers , 2009 .

[7]  Autumn Edwards,et al.  Changing Rhythms of American Family Life , 2009 .

[8]  N. Augustine Rising Above The Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future , 2006 .

[9]  A. Taylor Opting out. , 1993, Nursing times.

[10]  T. L. Parcel Competing Devotions: Career and Family among Women Executives , 2006 .

[11]  Mary Frank Fox,et al.  Work and family conflict in academic science: Patterns and predictors among women and men in research universities , 2011, Social studies of science.

[12]  E. Cech,et al.  Consequences of Flexibility Stigma Among Academic Scientists and Engineers , 2014 .

[13]  Patrick E. Shrout,et al.  Should Significance Tests be Banned? Introduction to a Special Section Exploring the Pros and Cons , 1997 .

[14]  M. Linn,et al.  Gender Similarities in Mathematics and Science , 2006, Science.

[15]  S. Ceci,et al.  Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  M. Mason,et al.  Do Babies Matter?: Gender and Family in the Ivory Tower , 2013 .

[17]  Mary Blair-Loy,et al.  Competing Devotions: Career and Family among Women Executives , 2003 .

[18]  Emily Greenman Asian American–White Differences in the Effect of Motherhood on Career Outcomes , 2011, Work and occupations.

[19]  W. Heath The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies , 2008 .

[20]  Adrienne D. Davis Foreword--Symposium: Unbending Gender: Why Work and Family Conflict and What to Do About It , 2000 .

[21]  G. Elder Life course dynamics : trajectories and transitions, 1968-1980 , 1987 .

[22]  Sharon Hays,et al.  The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood , 1996 .

[23]  E. Spelke Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science?: a critical review. , 2005, The American psychologist.

[24]  Shelley J. Correll,et al.  Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?1 , 2007, American Journal of Sociology.

[25]  M. Shanahan,et al.  Pathways to Adulthood in Changing Societies: Variability and Mechanisms in Life Course Perspective , 2000 .

[26]  L. Grant,et al.  Women in Engineering: Gender, Power, and Work Place Culture. , 1993 .

[27]  Jason M. Sheltzer,et al.  Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer women , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Mary Frank Fox,et al.  Women and Men Faculty in Academic Science and Engineering: Social-Organizational Indicators and Implications , 2010 .

[29]  P. Moen,et al.  Women's Two Roles: A Contemporary Dilemma , 1992 .

[30]  Brian Rubineau,et al.  Professional Role Confidence and Gendered Persistence in Engineering , 2011 .

[31]  D. Geary,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST The Science of Sex Differences in Science and Mathematics , 2022 .

[32]  Peter Rooney,et al.  American Competitiveness Initiative , 2006 .

[33]  Shelley J. Correll,et al.  Constraints into Preferences: Gender, Status, and Emerging Career Aspirations , 2004 .

[34]  M. Ferguson,et al.  How gender determines the way we speak about professionals , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  M. Mason,et al.  Do Babies Matter? , 2013 .

[36]  Julie A. Bianchini,et al.  Expanding underrepresented minority participation: America's science and technology talent at the crossroads , 2013 .

[37]  Jeffrey J. Kuenzi Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education: Background, Federal Policy, and Legislative Action , 2008 .

[38]  M. Singer Beyond Bias and Barriers , 2006, Science.

[39]  Irene Padavic,et al.  An Examination of Competing Explanations for the Pay Gap among Scientists and Engineers , 2005 .

[40]  S. Cole,et al.  Women in science. , 1994, Science.

[41]  P. Moen Women's two roles : a contemporary dilemma , 1993 .

[42]  C. Wennerås,et al.  Nepotism and sexism in peer-review , 1997, Nature.

[43]  Anne E. Lincoln,et al.  Failing Families, Failing Science: Work-Family Conflict in Academic Science , 2016 .

[44]  S. Hewlett,et al.  Off-ramps and on-ramps: keeping talented women on the road to success. , 2007, Harvard business review.

[45]  Amanda B. Diekman,et al.  Making STEM “Family Friendly”: The Impact of Perceiving Science Careers as Family-Compatible , 2017 .

[46]  Ernesto Reuben,et al.  How stereotypes impair women’s careers in science , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  Kimberlee A. Shauman,et al.  Gender Differences in the Early Employment Outcomes of STEM Doctorates , 2017 .

[48]  Erin A. Cech,et al.  Ideological Wage Inequalities?: The Technical/Social Dualism and the Gender Wage Gap in Engineering , 2013 .

[49]  S. Page Prologue to The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies , 2007 .

[50]  M. Graham,et al.  Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.