Improved Performance of Ballasted Rail Tracks Using Plastics and Rubber Inclusions

Abstract Current railroads require significant upgrading to meet the challenges of heavier loads at higher speeds. Due to excessive track degradation, the Australian rail industry spends large amounts on frequent track repair and maintenance, as well as ground improvement prior to track construction where soft and saturated subgrade soils pose considerable difficulties in design and construction. Moreover, the degradation of ballast particles under impact loading seriously hampers the safety and efficiency of rail tracks, which leads to speed restrictions and more frequent track upgrading. Hence, there is a need for innovative design solutions that can extend the service life of tracks to cater for faster and heavier train traffic. The use of planar geosynthetics and recycled rubber mats placed at the interface of ballast and subballast layer has proven an effective approach to mitigate ballast degradation and improve track longevity. This paper presents the current state-of-the-art knowledge of rail track geomechanics conducted at the University of Wollongong (UOW) including topics relating to laboratory testing and computational modeling approaches. The load-deformation responses of rubber mat/geogrid-stabilised ballast are studied in the laboratory using a large-scale drop weight impact testing facility, and Track Process Simulation Apparatus (TPSA). Numerical modelling using discrete element methods (DEM) are used to model geogrid-reinforced ballasted tracks, capturing both the discrete nature of ballast subject to various types of loading and boundary conditions. These results provide promising approaches to incorporate into the existing track design routines catering for future high speed and heavy haul trains.

[1]  Buddhima Indraratna,et al.  Simulation Ballasted Track Behavior: Numerical Treatment and Field Application , 2017 .

[2]  P. Cundall,et al.  A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies , 1979 .

[3]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  Dynamic crack propagations in prestressed concrete sleepers in railway track systems subjected to severe impact loads , 2010 .

[4]  Erol Tutumluer,et al.  Discrete Element Modeling for fouled railroad ballast , 2011 .

[5]  C. O. Frederick,et al.  Vertical track loading , 1985 .

[6]  Buddhima Indraratna,et al.  DEM simulation of the behaviour of geogrid stabilised ballast fouled with coal , 2014 .

[7]  Buddhima Indraratna,et al.  Behavior of geogrid-reinforced ballast under various levels of fouling , 2011 .

[8]  Buddhima Indraratna,et al.  Stabilization of track substructure with geo-inclusions—experimental evidence and DEM simulation , 2017 .

[9]  Rui Calçada,et al.  Ballast mats for the reduction of railway traffic vibrations. Numerical study , 2012 .

[10]  Ennio M. Palmeira,et al.  Assessing the Influence of Some Soil–Reinforcement Interaction Parameters on the Performance of a Low Fill on Compressible Subgrade. Part I: Fill Performance and Relevance of Interaction Parameters , 2016 .

[11]  Erol Tutumluer,et al.  Geogrid-Aggregate Interlock Mechanism Investigated through Aggregate Imaging-Based Discrete Element Modeling Approach , 2012 .

[12]  Sanjay Nimbalkar,et al.  Improved Performance of Railway Ballast under Impact Loads Using Shock Mats , 2012 .

[13]  Buddhima Indraratna,et al.  Deformation of Coal Fouled Ballast Stabilized with Geogrid under Cyclic Load , 2013 .

[14]  Malcolm D. Bolton,et al.  On the micromechanics of crushable aggregates , 1998 .

[15]  Buddhima Indraratna,et al.  Improved Performance of Rail Track Substructure Using Synthetic Inclusions: Experimental and Numerical Investigations , 2016 .

[16]  Sanjay Nimbalkar,et al.  The role of ballast fouling characteristics on the drainage capacity of rail substructure , 2012 .

[17]  Paul Weston,et al.  The behaviour of railway level crossings: Insights through field monitoring , 2014 .

[18]  Catherine O'Sullivan,et al.  DISCRETE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF THE RESPONSE OF GRANULAR MATERIALS DURING CYCLIC LOADING , 2008 .

[19]  Buddhima Indraratna,et al.  Modelling of geocell-reinforced subballast subjected to cyclic loading , 2016 .

[20]  Richard J. Bathurst,et al.  GEOGRID REINFORCEMENT OF BALLASTED TRACK , 1987 .

[21]  Stefano Bruni,et al.  Numerical and Experimental Assessment of Advanced Concepts to Reduce Noise and Vibration on Urban Railway Turnouts , 2009 .

[22]  Fei Wang,et al.  DEM Analysis of Stresses and Deformations of Geogrid-Reinforced Embankments over Piles , 2012 .

[23]  S. F. Brown,et al.  Discrete element modelling of geogrid-reinforced aggregates , 2006 .

[24]  D Lyon,et al.  THE EFFECT OF TRACK AND VEHICLE PARAMETERS ON WHEEL/RAIL VERTICAL DYNAMIC FORCES , 1974 .

[25]  Sanjay Nimbalkar,et al.  Improved Performance of Ballasted Rail Track Using Geosynthetics and Rubber Shockmat , 2016 .

[26]  Ernest T. Selig,et al.  Track Geotechnology and Substructure Management , 1995 .

[27]  B. Indraratna,et al.  Advanced Rail Geotechnology – Ballasted Track , 2011 .

[28]  Buddhima Indraratna,et al.  Behavior of fresh and fouled railway ballast subjected to direct shear testing: discrete element simulation , 2014 .

[29]  Yu Qian,et al.  Experimental Study on Triaxial Geogrid-Reinforced Bases over Weak Subgrade under Cyclic Loading , 2010 .

[30]  Buddhima Indraratna,et al.  A LABORATORY STUDY OF RAILWAY BALLAST BEHAVIOUR UNDER VARIOUS FOULING DEGREE , 2012 .