Contribution of local site-effect on the seismic response of suspension bridges to spatially varying ground motions

In this paper, it is aimed to determine the stochastic response of a suspension bridge subjected to spatially varying ground motions considering the geometric nonlinearity. Bosphorus Suspension Bridge built in Turkey and connects Europe to Asia in Istanbul is selected as a numerical example. The spatial variability of the ground motion is considered with the incoherence, wave-passage and site-response effects. The importance of site-response effect which arises from the difference in the local soil conditions at different support points of the structure is also investigated. At the end of the study, mean of the maximum and variance response values obtained from the spatially varying ground motions are compared with those of the specialised cases of the ground motion model. It is seen that each component of the spatially varying ground motion model has important effects on the dynamic behaviour of the bridge. The response values obtained from the general excitation case, which also includes the site-response effect causes larger response values than those of the homogeneous soil condition cases. The variance values calculated for the general excitation case are dominated by dynamic component at the deck and Asian side tower. The response values obtained for the site-response effect alone are larger than the response values obtained for the incoherence and wave-passage effects, separately. It can be concluded that suspension bridges are sensitive to the spatial variability of ground motion. Therefore, the incoherence, the wave-passage and especially the site-response effects should be considered in the stochastic analysis of this type of engineering structures.

[1]  Yuan-Feng Duan,et al.  Seismic damage of long span steel tower suspension bridge considering strong aftershocks , 2012 .

[2]  Hong Hao,et al.  Effectiveness of using rubber bumper and restrainer on mitigating pounding and unseating damage of bridge structures subjected to spatially varying ground motions , 2014 .

[3]  Frederic Ward Williams,et al.  Random vibration analysis of long-span structures subjected to spatially varying ground motions , 2009 .

[4]  Sevket Ates,et al.  Effects of soil-structure interaction on construction stage analysis of highway bridges , 2013 .

[5]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Operational modal analysis of a long-span suspension bridge under different earthquake events , 2015 .

[6]  A. A. Dumanoglu,et al.  The effect of spatially varying earthquake ground motions on the stochastic response of bridges isolated with friction pendulum systems , 2006 .

[7]  Ahmed Ghobarah,et al.  Site effects on the seismic response of a suspension bridge , 1996 .

[8]  Kurtuluş Soyluk,et al.  Soil–structure interaction analysis of cable-stayed bridges for spatially varying ground motion components , 2012 .

[9]  Hongyu Wang,et al.  Thermally induced soil structure interaction in the existing integral bridge , 2016 .

[10]  Hong Hao,et al.  Numerical simulation of pounding damage to bridge structures under spatially varying ground motions , 2013 .

[11]  Hong Hao,et al.  Seismic Response Analysis of Multiple-Frame Bridges with Unseating Restrainers considering Ground Motion Spatial Variation and SSI , 2015 .

[12]  Frederic Ward Williams,et al.  Seismic spatial effects for long-span bridges, using the pseudo excitation method , 2004 .

[13]  Agathoklis Giaralis,et al.  Derivation of response spectrum compatible non-stationary stochastic processes relying on Monte Carlo-based peak factor estimation , 2012 .

[14]  Ronald S. Harichandran,et al.  RESPONSE OF LONG-SPAN BRIDGES TO SPATIALLY VARYING GROUND MOTION , 1996 .

[15]  Bo Li,et al.  Experimental investigation of inelastic bridge response under spatially varying excitations with pounding , 2014 .

[16]  E. Vanmarcke,et al.  Stochastic Variation of Earthquake Ground Motion in Space and Time , 1986 .

[17]  Saptarshi Sasmal,et al.  Investigations on seismic response of two span cable-stayed bridges , 2011 .

[18]  Giulia M.B. Viggiani,et al.  Soil–structure interaction for the seismic design of the Messina Strait Bridge , 2013 .

[19]  Mohammed M. Ettouney,et al.  FREQUENCY-DOMAIN ANALYSIS OF LONG-SPAN BRIDGES SUBJECTED TO NONUNIFORM SEISMIC MOTIONS , 2001 .

[20]  A. Kiureghian A COHERENCY MODEL FOR SPATIALLY VARYING GROUND MOTIONS , 1996 .

[21]  Xiuli Du,et al.  Pounding analysis of RC bridge considering spatial variability of ground motion , 2015 .

[22]  Ahmed M. Abdel-Ghaffar,et al.  Suspension Bridge Response to Multiple-Support Excitations , 1982 .

[23]  James M. W. Brownjohn,et al.  Observations on non‐linear dynamic characteristics of suspension bridges , 1994 .